Demotivating Online Formative Assessment Strategies at an Open Distance Learning University

Antonia Makina
{"title":"Demotivating Online Formative Assessment Strategies at an Open Distance Learning University","authors":"Antonia Makina","doi":"10.25159/2663-5895/13117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online formative assessment strategies are an important element in the level of engagement needed for motivating students learning online in open distance learning (ODL) because they are key in offering large-scale interactive participation. While many studies have looked at the advantages of online formative assessment strategies, they have neglected demotivating online formative assessment strategies that students struggle with. To ensure the quality of the online assessment, it is also important to understand the nature of assessment practices that demotivate students from persisting with their studies. This is because the type of online assessment that students struggle with should guide the choice and design of the online formative assessment strategies. Therefore, this article identifies online formative assessment strategies that demotivate students from participating persistently in online formative assessment in ODL in order to improve the design and development of online learning. This study used a developmental research approach to carry out a descriptive quantitative case study survey involving 112 purposefully sampled students, of which 58 responded, who were registered for a master’s in education in ODL course at an ODL university in South Africa. A thematic coding process was adopted during the analysis of students’ responses to an online Google form. Though students differed in their choices of the online formative assessment strategies that demotivated them in their studies, there was consensus on seven significant themes. The socio-technological perspective and the self-determination theory were used as the theoretical frameworks to drive the investigation since they encompassed all relevant aspects of the design of online learning and motivation to learn online. Information regarding demotivating online formative assessment strategies provide insight to course leaders and instructional designers attempting to build successful online learning strategies that motivate students to participate persistently in online learning environments.","PeriodicalId":476034,"journal":{"name":"Progressio","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progressio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-5895/13117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online formative assessment strategies are an important element in the level of engagement needed for motivating students learning online in open distance learning (ODL) because they are key in offering large-scale interactive participation. While many studies have looked at the advantages of online formative assessment strategies, they have neglected demotivating online formative assessment strategies that students struggle with. To ensure the quality of the online assessment, it is also important to understand the nature of assessment practices that demotivate students from persisting with their studies. This is because the type of online assessment that students struggle with should guide the choice and design of the online formative assessment strategies. Therefore, this article identifies online formative assessment strategies that demotivate students from participating persistently in online formative assessment in ODL in order to improve the design and development of online learning. This study used a developmental research approach to carry out a descriptive quantitative case study survey involving 112 purposefully sampled students, of which 58 responded, who were registered for a master’s in education in ODL course at an ODL university in South Africa. A thematic coding process was adopted during the analysis of students’ responses to an online Google form. Though students differed in their choices of the online formative assessment strategies that demotivated them in their studies, there was consensus on seven significant themes. The socio-technological perspective and the self-determination theory were used as the theoretical frameworks to drive the investigation since they encompassed all relevant aspects of the design of online learning and motivation to learn online. Information regarding demotivating online formative assessment strategies provide insight to course leaders and instructional designers attempting to build successful online learning strategies that motivate students to participate persistently in online learning environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一所开放远程学习大学的在线形成性评估策略
在线形成性评估策略是激励学生在开放远程学习(ODL)中在线学习所需的参与水平的一个重要因素,因为它们是提供大规模互动参与的关键。虽然许多研究都关注了在线形成性评估策略的优势,但他们忽视了学生们所挣扎的在线形成性评估策略的消极影响。为了确保在线评估的质量,了解使学生失去坚持学习动力的评估实践的性质也很重要。这是因为学生所纠结的在线评估类型应该指导在线形成性评估策略的选择和设计。因此,本文确定了在线形成性评估策略,这些策略可以降低学生在ODL中持续参与在线形成性评估的积极性,从而改进在线学习的设计和开发。本研究采用发展研究方法,对112名有目的地抽样的学生进行了描述性定量案例研究调查,其中58名回应,他们在南非一所ODL大学注册了ODL课程的硕士教育课程。在分析学生对在线谷歌表单的反应时,采用了主题编码过程。尽管学生们对在线形成性评估策略的选择有所不同,但他们在七个重要主题上达成了共识。社会技术视角和自我决定理论被用作推动调查的理论框架,因为它们涵盖了在线学习设计和在线学习动机的所有相关方面。关于削弱在线形成性评估策略的信息为课程领导者和教学设计师提供了洞察力,他们试图建立成功的在线学习策略,激励学生持续参与在线学习环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emerging Trends in South African Higher Education: A Critical Analysis of Distance Learning Modalities in Music Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions of the Use of Online Examinations in an Open and Distance Learning Environment Demotivating Online Formative Assessment Strategies at an Open Distance Learning University A Design Thinking Approach to Disentangle the Wicked Problem of Re-Curriculation during a Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1