FairCaipi: A Combination of Explanatory Interactive and Fair Machine Learning for Human and Machine Bias Reduction

IF 4 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Machine learning and knowledge extraction Pub Date : 2023-10-18 DOI:10.3390/make5040076
Louisa Heidrich, Emanuel Slany, Stephan Scheele, Ute Schmid
{"title":"FairCaipi: A Combination of Explanatory Interactive and Fair Machine Learning for Human and Machine Bias Reduction","authors":"Louisa Heidrich, Emanuel Slany, Stephan Scheele, Ute Schmid","doi":"10.3390/make5040076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of machine-learning applications in domains with critical end-user impact has led to a growing concern about the fairness of learned models, with the goal of avoiding biases that negatively impact specific demographic groups. Most existing bias-mitigation strategies adapt the importance of data instances during pre-processing. Since fairness is a contextual concept, we advocate for an interactive machine-learning approach that enables users to provide iterative feedback for model adaptation. Specifically, we propose to adapt the explanatory interactive machine-learning approach Caipi for fair machine learning. FairCaipi incorporates human feedback in the loop on predictions and explanations to improve the fairness of the model. Experimental results demonstrate that FairCaipi outperforms a state-of-the-art pre-processing bias mitigation strategy in terms of the fairness and the predictive performance of the resulting machine-learning model. We show that FairCaipi can both uncover and reduce bias in machine-learning models and allows us to detect human bias.","PeriodicalId":93033,"journal":{"name":"Machine learning and knowledge extraction","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine learning and knowledge extraction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/make5040076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rise of machine-learning applications in domains with critical end-user impact has led to a growing concern about the fairness of learned models, with the goal of avoiding biases that negatively impact specific demographic groups. Most existing bias-mitigation strategies adapt the importance of data instances during pre-processing. Since fairness is a contextual concept, we advocate for an interactive machine-learning approach that enables users to provide iterative feedback for model adaptation. Specifically, we propose to adapt the explanatory interactive machine-learning approach Caipi for fair machine learning. FairCaipi incorporates human feedback in the loop on predictions and explanations to improve the fairness of the model. Experimental results demonstrate that FairCaipi outperforms a state-of-the-art pre-processing bias mitigation strategy in terms of the fairness and the predictive performance of the resulting machine-learning model. We show that FairCaipi can both uncover and reduce bias in machine-learning models and allows us to detect human bias.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公平caipi:解释性互动与公平机器学习的结合,以减少人类与机器的偏见
机器学习应用在具有关键最终用户影响的领域的兴起,导致人们越来越关注学习模型的公平性,其目标是避免对特定人口群体产生负面影响的偏见。大多数现有的偏差缓解策略在预处理过程中调整数据实例的重要性。由于公平是一个上下文概念,我们提倡一种交互式机器学习方法,使用户能够为模型适应提供迭代反馈。具体来说,我们建议将解释性交互式机器学习方法Caipi用于公平的机器学习。FairCaipi在预测和解释的循环中加入了人类的反馈,以提高模型的公平性。实验结果表明,FairCaipi在公平性和结果机器学习模型的预测性能方面优于最先进的预处理偏见缓解策略。我们证明FairCaipi可以发现和减少机器学习模型中的偏见,并允许我们检测人类偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Knowledge Graph Extraction of Business Interactions from News Text for Business Networking Analysis Machine Learning for an Enhanced Credit Risk Analysis: A Comparative Study of Loan Approval Prediction Models Integrating Mental Health Data A Data Mining Approach for Health Transport Demand Predicting Wind Comfort in an Urban Area: A Comparison of a Regression- with a Classification-CNN for General Wind Rose Statistics An Evaluative Baseline for Sentence-Level Semantic Division
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1