Machine Learning for an Enhanced Credit Risk Analysis: A Comparative Study of Loan Approval Prediction Models Integrating Mental Health Data

IF 4 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Machine learning and knowledge extraction Pub Date : 2024-01-04 DOI:10.3390/make6010004
Adnan Alagic, Natasa Zivic, E. Kadusic, Dženan Hamzić, Narcisa Hadzajlic, Mejra Dizdarević, Elmedin Selmanovic
{"title":"Machine Learning for an Enhanced Credit Risk Analysis: A Comparative Study of Loan Approval Prediction Models Integrating Mental Health Data","authors":"Adnan Alagic, Natasa Zivic, E. Kadusic, Dženan Hamzić, Narcisa Hadzajlic, Mejra Dizdarević, Elmedin Selmanovic","doi":"10.3390/make6010004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number of loan requests is rapidly growing worldwide representing a multi-billion-dollar business in the credit approval industry. Large data volumes extracted from the banking transactions that represent customers’ behavior are available, but processing loan applications is a complex and time-consuming task for banking institutions. In 2022, over 20 million Americans had open loans, totaling USD 178 billion in debt, although over 20% of loan applications were rejected. Numerous statistical methods have been deployed to estimate loan risks opening the field to estimate whether machine learning techniques can better predict the potential risks. To study the machine learning paradigm in this sector, the mental health dataset and loan approval dataset presenting survey results from 1991 individuals are used as inputs to experiment with the credit risk prediction ability of the chosen machine learning algorithms. Giving a comprehensive comparative analysis, this paper shows how the chosen machine learning algorithms can distinguish between normal and risky loan customers who might never pay their debts back. The results from the tested algorithms show that XGBoost achieves the highest accuracy of 84% in the first dataset, surpassing gradient boost (83%) and KNN (83%). In the second dataset, random forest achieved the highest accuracy of 85%, followed by decision tree and KNN with 83%. Alongside accuracy, the precision, recall, and overall performance of the algorithms were tested and a confusion matrix analysis was performed producing numerical results that emphasized the superior performance of XGBoost and random forest in the classification tasks in the first dataset, and XGBoost and decision tree in the second dataset. Researchers and practitioners can rely on these findings to form their model selection process and enhance the accuracy and precision of their classification models.","PeriodicalId":93033,"journal":{"name":"Machine learning and knowledge extraction","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine learning and knowledge extraction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/make6010004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The number of loan requests is rapidly growing worldwide representing a multi-billion-dollar business in the credit approval industry. Large data volumes extracted from the banking transactions that represent customers’ behavior are available, but processing loan applications is a complex and time-consuming task for banking institutions. In 2022, over 20 million Americans had open loans, totaling USD 178 billion in debt, although over 20% of loan applications were rejected. Numerous statistical methods have been deployed to estimate loan risks opening the field to estimate whether machine learning techniques can better predict the potential risks. To study the machine learning paradigm in this sector, the mental health dataset and loan approval dataset presenting survey results from 1991 individuals are used as inputs to experiment with the credit risk prediction ability of the chosen machine learning algorithms. Giving a comprehensive comparative analysis, this paper shows how the chosen machine learning algorithms can distinguish between normal and risky loan customers who might never pay their debts back. The results from the tested algorithms show that XGBoost achieves the highest accuracy of 84% in the first dataset, surpassing gradient boost (83%) and KNN (83%). In the second dataset, random forest achieved the highest accuracy of 85%, followed by decision tree and KNN with 83%. Alongside accuracy, the precision, recall, and overall performance of the algorithms were tested and a confusion matrix analysis was performed producing numerical results that emphasized the superior performance of XGBoost and random forest in the classification tasks in the first dataset, and XGBoost and decision tree in the second dataset. Researchers and practitioners can rely on these findings to form their model selection process and enhance the accuracy and precision of their classification models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增强信用风险分析的机器学习:整合心理健康数据的贷款审批预测模型比较研究
贷款申请数量在全球范围内迅速增长,在信贷审批行业中代表着数十亿美元的业务。从银行交易中提取的大量数据代表了客户的行为,但对银行机构来说,处理贷款申请是一项复杂而耗时的任务。2022 年,超过 2,000 万美国人有未结贷款,债务总额达 1,780 亿美元,但超过 20% 的贷款申请被拒。为估算贷款风险,人们采用了大量统计方法,以估算机器学习技术能否更好地预测潜在风险。为了研究该领域的机器学习范例,我们使用了心理健康数据集和贷款审批数据集,这两个数据集展示了 1991 年的个人调查结果,并以此为输入,对所选机器学习算法的信贷风险预测能力进行了实验。通过综合比较分析,本文展示了所选机器学习算法如何区分正常贷款客户和可能永远无法偿还债务的高风险贷款客户。测试结果表明,在第一个数据集中,XGBoost 的准确率最高,达到 84%,超过了梯度提升(83%)和 KNN(83%)。在第二个数据集中,随机森林的准确率最高,达到 85%,其次是决策树和 KNN,均为 83%。除了准确率,还测试了算法的精确度、召回率和整体性能,并进行了混淆矩阵分析,得出的数值结果表明,在第一个数据集中,XGBoost 和随机森林在分类任务中表现出色,在第二个数据集中,XGBoost 和决策树表现出色。研究人员和从业人员可以利用这些发现来制定模型选择流程,并提高分类模型的准确性和精确度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Knowledge Graph Extraction of Business Interactions from News Text for Business Networking Analysis Machine Learning for an Enhanced Credit Risk Analysis: A Comparative Study of Loan Approval Prediction Models Integrating Mental Health Data A Data Mining Approach for Health Transport Demand Predicting Wind Comfort in an Urban Area: A Comparison of a Regression- with a Classification-CNN for General Wind Rose Statistics An Evaluative Baseline for Sentence-Level Semantic Division
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1