{"title":"How does managerial consultation backfire pertaining to employee voice pressure?","authors":"Xiaotian Wang, Jingming Guo, Yujie Cai, Yue Zhu, Jinyun Duan","doi":"10.1080/09585192.2023.2263347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn response to managerial consultation, employees are likely to be pressured yes-persons. In this paper, we propose the concept of voice pressure and explore its antecedent of managerial consultation and differential voice consequences (i.e. challenging vs. supportive voice). Using a time-lagged survey of 346 employees and their direct leaders in mainland China, we found that managerial consultation could lead to employee voice pressure. We also found that after controlling for the social exchange mechanism (i.e. leader-member exchange) and enabling mechanism (i.e. voice efficacy), the ‘managerial consultation-voice pressure-challenging voice’ relationship is negative, while the ‘managerial consultation-voice pressure-supportive voice’ relationship is positive. Furthermore, these indirect relationships are pronounced when employee power distance orientation is higher (vs. lower). We provide a new perspective for the interpretation of managerial consultation; it puts voice pressure on employees and makes them more likely to be managers’ yes-persons. Therefore, managers who expect constructive challenging ideas should conduct consultation selectively and discreetly according to employees’ attitudes towards power inequalities (i.e. power distance orientation).Keywords: Managerial consultationvoice pressurechallenging voicesupportive voiceemployee power distance orientation Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data used for this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.Additional informationFundingThis study was financially supported by the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC - 72072058 & 71732007).","PeriodicalId":14185,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human Resource Management","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Human Resource Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2023.2263347","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractIn response to managerial consultation, employees are likely to be pressured yes-persons. In this paper, we propose the concept of voice pressure and explore its antecedent of managerial consultation and differential voice consequences (i.e. challenging vs. supportive voice). Using a time-lagged survey of 346 employees and their direct leaders in mainland China, we found that managerial consultation could lead to employee voice pressure. We also found that after controlling for the social exchange mechanism (i.e. leader-member exchange) and enabling mechanism (i.e. voice efficacy), the ‘managerial consultation-voice pressure-challenging voice’ relationship is negative, while the ‘managerial consultation-voice pressure-supportive voice’ relationship is positive. Furthermore, these indirect relationships are pronounced when employee power distance orientation is higher (vs. lower). We provide a new perspective for the interpretation of managerial consultation; it puts voice pressure on employees and makes them more likely to be managers’ yes-persons. Therefore, managers who expect constructive challenging ideas should conduct consultation selectively and discreetly according to employees’ attitudes towards power inequalities (i.e. power distance orientation).Keywords: Managerial consultationvoice pressurechallenging voicesupportive voiceemployee power distance orientation Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data used for this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.Additional informationFundingThis study was financially supported by the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC - 72072058 & 71732007).
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Human Resource Management is the forum for HRM scholars and professionals worldwide. Concerned with the expanding role of strategic human resource management in a fast-changing global environment, the journal focuses on future trends in human resource management, drawing on empirical research in the areas of strategic management, international business, organizational behaviour, personnel management and industrial relations that arise from: -internationalization- technological change- market integration- new concepts of line management- increased competition- changing corporate climates Now publishing twenty-two issues per year, The International Journal of Human Resource Management encourages strategically focused articles on a wide range of issues including employee participation, human resource flow, reward systems and high commitment work systems. It is an essential publication in an exciting field, examining all management decisions that affect the relationship between an organization and its employees. Features include; -comparative contributions from both developed and developing countries- special issues based on conferences and current issues- international bibliographies- international data sets- reviews