Solving the Oneida Question: Anglo-American relations during a public outcry

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY MARINERS MIRROR Pub Date : 2023-10-02 DOI:10.1080/00253359.2023.2260250
Matthew McLin
{"title":"Solving the <i>Oneida</i> Question: Anglo-American relations during a public outcry","authors":"Matthew McLin","doi":"10.1080/00253359.2023.2260250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractOn 24 January 1870 USS Oneida sank when, sailing out of Tokyo Bay, it collided with the British ship Bombay, which failed to stop and render aid, leading to the deaths of 115 American sailors. This article compares the public reaction of the Anglo-American press with the internal conversations in both nations’ governments. It will demonstrate how, despite intense public condemnation of the British captain, both countries were keen to put the issue to rest in as quiet and amicable a manner as possible. The goal of presenting a united front to the new Meiji government was essential during a new era of imperial co-operation.Key words: Anglo-American relationsMeiji JapanUSS OneidaBombayCharles DeLongLord Harry ParkesshipwreckUnited States Navy Notes1 The author is grateful for the input of the anonymous referees whose comments helped to improve this article.2 The Times, 7 April 1870.3 United States Navy Department, Loss of the United States Oneida, 84.4 Ibid., 79; New York Herald, 10 March 1870.5 Jenkins, Britain and the war for the Union, 1–2.6 Ibid., 305; 385–8.7 Foreman, A World on Fire, 191–6.8 Darwin, The Empire Project, 68–9.9 Jensen, The Making of Modern Japan, 270, 274.10 Ibid., 369.11 Ibid., 315.12 Darwin, The Empire Project, 27-8.13 Ibid., 35-6.14 Cain and Hopkins, British Imperialism, 362-6.15 Gordon, A Modern History of Japan, 73.16 Ibid., 74.17 United States Navy Department, Loss of the United States Oneida, 21.18 Ibid., 18.19 Ibid., 12.20 Ibid., 56.21 Ibid., 45.22 Ibid. 26.23 Ibid., 22.24 Ibid., 48.25 Ibid., 62.26 Ibid., 11.27 Ibid., 84.28 Boston Daily Advertiser, 10 March, 1870.29 United States Navy Department, Loss of the United States Oneida, 11.30 Ibid., 43, 69.31 Ibid., 46.32 Ibid., 69.33 Columbian Register, 19 Mar. 1870.34 United States Navy Department, Loss of the United States Oneida, 16, 74.35 Philadelphia Enquirer, 11 Mar. 1870; Columbian Register, 2 Apr. 1870.36 United States Navy Department, Loss of the United States Oneida, 79.37 Ibid., 18, 23.38 Ibid., 40-1.39 Ibid. 25.40 Ibid., 67-8.41 Ibid., 25.42 The report was widely circulated in the London and provincial press, e.g., Gore’s Liverpool General Advertiser, 10 Mar. 1870; and The Graphic, 12 Mar. 1870. Newspapers accessed via www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk.43 The Star, 12 Mar. 187044 For example, Fifeshire Journal, 10 Mar. 1870.45 The Times, 8 Mar. 1870.46 Flakes Weekly Galveston Bulletin, 12 Mar. 1870.47 Boston Daily Advertiser, 14 Mar. 1870.48 The National Archives, Kew (hereafter TNA): MT 9/51/M4114/70, Report on the collision between the ‘Oneida’ and ‘Bombay’, 1870.49 United States Navy Department, Loss of the United States Oneida.50 TNA: MT 9/51/M4114/70, Report on the collision between the ‘Oneida’ and ‘Bombay’, 1870.51 Hansard, 5 Jul. 1870.52 United States Navy Department, Loss of the United States Oneida, 2, 6.53 The official notes and evidence in the proceedings of the naval court of inquiry as to the collision between the U.S. Corvette Oneida and the P.&O. Str. Bombay (Yokohama, 1870)54 Black, Young Japan; Scidmore, Jinrikisha days in Japan.55 Johnson, Far China station; McCreery, ‘Neighbourly Relations’.56 Nakada, ‘Maizō bunkazai’.57 McCreery, ‘Neighbourly Relations’, 200.58 Gordon, A Modern History of Japan.59 Darwin, The Empire Project, 35-6.Additional informationNotes on contributorsMatthew McLinMatthew McLin is an assistant professor of history at Trine University in Indiana in the United States. After receiving his PhD from Florida State University in 2021, he taught in various locations in the United States before moving to the Midwest. His research interests include technology in history, the interaction of business and government, and questions of class and gender as they relate to the British military. His current project examines the relationship between Britain and Japan in the Meiji Period, especially regarding how matters of gender and race in Japan were presented to the wider world by the local anglophone press.","PeriodicalId":44123,"journal":{"name":"MARINERS MIRROR","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MARINERS MIRROR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00253359.2023.2260250","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractOn 24 January 1870 USS Oneida sank when, sailing out of Tokyo Bay, it collided with the British ship Bombay, which failed to stop and render aid, leading to the deaths of 115 American sailors. This article compares the public reaction of the Anglo-American press with the internal conversations in both nations’ governments. It will demonstrate how, despite intense public condemnation of the British captain, both countries were keen to put the issue to rest in as quiet and amicable a manner as possible. The goal of presenting a united front to the new Meiji government was essential during a new era of imperial co-operation.Key words: Anglo-American relationsMeiji JapanUSS OneidaBombayCharles DeLongLord Harry ParkesshipwreckUnited States Navy Notes1 The author is grateful for the input of the anonymous referees whose comments helped to improve this article.2 The Times, 7 April 1870.3 United States Navy Department, Loss of the United States Oneida, 84.4 Ibid., 79; New York Herald, 10 March 1870.5 Jenkins, Britain and the war for the Union, 1–2.6 Ibid., 305; 385–8.7 Foreman, A World on Fire, 191–6.8 Darwin, The Empire Project, 68–9.9 Jensen, The Making of Modern Japan, 270, 274.10 Ibid., 369.11 Ibid., 315.12 Darwin, The Empire Project, 27-8.13 Ibid., 35-6.14 Cain and Hopkins, British Imperialism, 362-6.15 Gordon, A Modern History of Japan, 73.16 Ibid., 74.17 United States Navy Department, Loss of the United States Oneida, 21.18 Ibid., 18.19 Ibid., 12.20 Ibid., 56.21 Ibid., 45.22 Ibid. 26.23 Ibid., 22.24 Ibid., 48.25 Ibid., 62.26 Ibid., 11.27 Ibid., 84.28 Boston Daily Advertiser, 10 March, 1870.29 United States Navy Department, Loss of the United States Oneida, 11.30 Ibid., 43, 69.31 Ibid., 46.32 Ibid., 69.33 Columbian Register, 19 Mar. 1870.34 United States Navy Department, Loss of the United States Oneida, 16, 74.35 Philadelphia Enquirer, 11 Mar. 1870; Columbian Register, 2 Apr. 1870.36 United States Navy Department, Loss of the United States Oneida, 79.37 Ibid., 18, 23.38 Ibid., 40-1.39 Ibid. 25.40 Ibid., 67-8.41 Ibid., 25.42 The report was widely circulated in the London and provincial press, e.g., Gore’s Liverpool General Advertiser, 10 Mar. 1870; and The Graphic, 12 Mar. 1870. Newspapers accessed via www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk.43 The Star, 12 Mar. 187044 For example, Fifeshire Journal, 10 Mar. 1870.45 The Times, 8 Mar. 1870.46 Flakes Weekly Galveston Bulletin, 12 Mar. 1870.47 Boston Daily Advertiser, 14 Mar. 1870.48 The National Archives, Kew (hereafter TNA): MT 9/51/M4114/70, Report on the collision between the ‘Oneida’ and ‘Bombay’, 1870.49 United States Navy Department, Loss of the United States Oneida.50 TNA: MT 9/51/M4114/70, Report on the collision between the ‘Oneida’ and ‘Bombay’, 1870.51 Hansard, 5 Jul. 1870.52 United States Navy Department, Loss of the United States Oneida, 2, 6.53 The official notes and evidence in the proceedings of the naval court of inquiry as to the collision between the U.S. Corvette Oneida and the P.&O. Str. Bombay (Yokohama, 1870)54 Black, Young Japan; Scidmore, Jinrikisha days in Japan.55 Johnson, Far China station; McCreery, ‘Neighbourly Relations’.56 Nakada, ‘Maizō bunkazai’.57 McCreery, ‘Neighbourly Relations’, 200.58 Gordon, A Modern History of Japan.59 Darwin, The Empire Project, 35-6.Additional informationNotes on contributorsMatthew McLinMatthew McLin is an assistant professor of history at Trine University in Indiana in the United States. After receiving his PhD from Florida State University in 2021, he taught in various locations in the United States before moving to the Midwest. His research interests include technology in history, the interaction of business and government, and questions of class and gender as they relate to the British military. His current project examines the relationship between Britain and Japan in the Meiji Period, especially regarding how matters of gender and race in Japan were presented to the wider world by the local anglophone press.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决奥奈达问题:公众抗议中的英美关系
1870年1月24日,美国海军“奥奈达”号在驶出东京湾时与英国“孟买”号相撞沉没,“孟买”号未能及时停下来提供援助,导致115名美国水兵死亡。这篇文章比较了英美媒体的公众反应和两国政府的内部对话。这将表明,尽管公众强烈谴责英国船长,但两国都希望以尽可能安静和友好的方式解决这个问题。在帝国合作的新时代,向明治政府展示统一战线的目标至关重要。关键词:英美关系明治日本第一轰炸机查尔斯·德隆勋爵哈里·帕克斯沉船美国海军注释作者感谢匿名审稿人的意见,他们的意见有助于本文的完善《泰晤士报》,1870.3年4月7日美国海军部,美国奥奈达的损失,84.4,同上,79;《纽约先驱报》,1875年3月10日。詹金斯,英国和联邦战争,1-2.6,同上,305;385-8.7福尔曼,一个燃烧的世界,191-6.8达尔文,帝国计划,68-9.9詹森,现代日本的形成,270,274.10同上,369.11同上,315.12达尔文,帝国计划,27-8.13同上,35-6.14凯恩和霍普金斯,英国帝国主义,362-6.15戈登,日本现代史,73.16同上,74.17美国海军部,美国奥奈达的损失,21.18同上,18.19同上,12.20同上,56.21同上,45.22同上,26.23同上,22.24同上,48.25同上,62.26同上,11.27同上,84.28《波士顿日报广告人》,1870.29美国海军部,美国奥奈达的损失,11.30同上,43,69.31同上,46.32同上,69.33《哥伦比亚纪事报》,1870.34美国海军部,美国奥奈达的损失,16,74.35《费城问询报》,1870年3月11日;美国海军部,美国奥奈达的损失,79.37同上,18,23.38同上,40-1.39同上,25.40同上,67-8.41同上,25.42该报告在伦敦和省级报刊上广为流传,例如,戈尔的利物浦综合广告人,1870年3月10日;1870年3月12日《图形报》。通过www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk.43访问的报纸:《星报》,187044年3月12日,例如:《费郡日报》,1870.45年3月10日,《泰晤士报》,1870.46年3月8日,《雪片周刊加尔维斯顿公报》,1870.47年3月12日,《波士顿每日广告人》,1870.48年3月14日,英国国家档案馆(以下简称TNA): MT 9/51/M4114/70,关于“奥尼达”号与“孟买”号相撞的报告,1870.49年,美国海军部,美国奥尼达号的损失。MT 9/51/M4114/70,关于“奥奈达”号与“孟买”号相撞的报告,1870.51,1870.52年7月5日美国海军部,“美国奥奈达”号的损失,1870.52年6月2日,海军调查法庭关于美国“奥奈达”号轻巡洋舰与“P & o”号相撞事件的官方记录和证据。孟买街(横滨,1870年)54黑人,年轻的日本;西德莫尔,金丽琪沙天在日本。约翰逊,远中国站;麦克里,《睦邻关系》,第56页中田,《maizhi bunkazai》,第57页麦克里,《睦邻关系》,200.58戈登,《日本近代史》。59达尔文,《帝国计划》,35-6页。作者简介马修·麦克林(matthew McLin)是美国印第安纳州三一大学历史学助理教授。在2021年从佛罗里达州立大学获得博士学位后,他在美国各地任教,后来搬到中西部。他的研究兴趣包括历史上的技术,商业和政府的互动,以及与英国军队有关的阶级和性别问题。他目前的项目是研究明治时期英国和日本之间的关系,特别是关于日本的性别和种族问题如何通过当地的英语媒体呈现给更广阔的世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
MARINERS MIRROR
MARINERS MIRROR HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: The Society’s quarterly journal, The Mariner"s Mirror, is internationally recognised as the pre-eminent English-language journal on naval and maritime history, nautical archaeology and all aspects of seafaring and lore of the sea. It covers a wide range of history, from Bronze Age ships to nuclear submarines, and nautical matters such as hydography, navigation and naval logistics. The Mariner’s Mirror has an extensive book review section. Its notes and queries sections and correspondence pages provide a channel for a lively exchange between members.
期刊最新文献
The Petrol Navy: British, American and other motor boats at war 1914–1920 The Petrol Navy: British, American and other motor boats at war 1914–1920 , by S. R. Dunn, Seaforth Publishing, 2023, £25 (hb), 320 pages, illustrations, ISBN 9781399062855 The Myth of HMS Minden and ‘The Star-Spangled Banner’: Where did it originate? A Jacobean Draught of an 18-gun Ship in the Danish National Archives Drawn by Phineas Pett Under Five Flags: Miguirditch Gumuchdjian, an Armenian shipowner of Constantinople and London 1900–1932 Documents Relating to the Official Dutch Naval Visit to Cherbourg, 8–10 September 1786
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1