Title Pending 3022

IF 2 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Journal of Political Ecology Pub Date : 2023-09-24 DOI:10.2458/jpe.3022
Vijay Krishnan Kolinjivadi, Jean-François Bissonnette, Laura Valencia, Daniel Leguizamon Alejo, Gert Van Hecken
{"title":"Title Pending 3022","authors":"Vijay Krishnan Kolinjivadi, Jean-François Bissonnette, Laura Valencia, Daniel Leguizamon Alejo, Gert Van Hecken","doi":"10.2458/jpe.3022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The green economy is proposed as a solution to address growing and potentially irreversible ecological crises. But what happens when environmental solutions are premised on the same logics of brutal simplification and dehumanization that sustain and reinforce systems of oppression and ecological breakdown? In this article, we describe the transformation of the biophysical landscape of the planet into replicable blueprints of the plantation plot. The plantation as a colonial-era organizational template is an ongoing ecological process premised on disciplining bodies and landscapes into efficient, predictable, calculable, and controllable plots to optimize commodity production and is dependent on racialized and gendered processes of dehumanization. The visible cultural, physical, aesthetic, and political singularity of the plot, under the guise of objectivity and neutrality, permits a tangible depiction of the way ecological breakdown takes place. We interrogate the notion of \"greening\" as a strategy to combat the unintended impacts of colonial plantation ecology, arguing that such tactics further reinforce the template of plantation ecology rather than dismantle it. We first conceptualize the historical plantation and its biophysical, cognitive, and corporeal organizational principles. We then offer examples of \"greening\" as new, more inclusive (but equally detrimental) forms of plantation logics, and crucially identify how these extensions of plantation logic get co-opted by resistance agents, from social movements to disease and pestilence. We consider sustainability certifications of palm oil through the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) in Colombia and compensatory afforestation programs designed to offset forest destruction through monoculture plantations in India. We conclude by highlighting how abolition ecologies can serve as an antidote to plantation logic and highlight necessary relationships of self-reflexivity, repair and collective solidarity required to disinvest in plantation ecology.","PeriodicalId":46814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.3022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The green economy is proposed as a solution to address growing and potentially irreversible ecological crises. But what happens when environmental solutions are premised on the same logics of brutal simplification and dehumanization that sustain and reinforce systems of oppression and ecological breakdown? In this article, we describe the transformation of the biophysical landscape of the planet into replicable blueprints of the plantation plot. The plantation as a colonial-era organizational template is an ongoing ecological process premised on disciplining bodies and landscapes into efficient, predictable, calculable, and controllable plots to optimize commodity production and is dependent on racialized and gendered processes of dehumanization. The visible cultural, physical, aesthetic, and political singularity of the plot, under the guise of objectivity and neutrality, permits a tangible depiction of the way ecological breakdown takes place. We interrogate the notion of "greening" as a strategy to combat the unintended impacts of colonial plantation ecology, arguing that such tactics further reinforce the template of plantation ecology rather than dismantle it. We first conceptualize the historical plantation and its biophysical, cognitive, and corporeal organizational principles. We then offer examples of "greening" as new, more inclusive (but equally detrimental) forms of plantation logics, and crucially identify how these extensions of plantation logic get co-opted by resistance agents, from social movements to disease and pestilence. We consider sustainability certifications of palm oil through the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) in Colombia and compensatory afforestation programs designed to offset forest destruction through monoculture plantations in India. We conclude by highlighting how abolition ecologies can serve as an antidote to plantation logic and highlight necessary relationships of self-reflexivity, repair and collective solidarity required to disinvest in plantation ecology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
待定所有权3022
绿色经济被认为是解决日益严重和潜在的不可逆转的生态危机的一种解决方案。但是,如果环境解决方案的前提是维持和加强压迫和生态崩溃的系统的野蛮简化和非人性化的逻辑,会发生什么?在这篇文章中,我们描述了地球的生物物理景观转化为可复制的种植园地块蓝图。作为殖民时代组织模板的种植园是一个持续的生态过程,其前提是将身体和景观规范为高效、可预测、可计算和可控的地块,以优化商品生产,并依赖于非人性化的种族化和性别化过程。在客观和中立的伪装下,情节中可见的文化、物理、美学和政治独特性,允许对生态崩溃发生的方式进行切实的描述。我们质疑“绿化”作为一种对抗殖民种植园生态意外影响的策略的概念,认为这种策略进一步强化了种植园生态的模板,而不是拆除它。我们首先将历史种植园及其生物物理、认知和物质组织原则概念化。然后,我们提供了“绿化”作为新的、更具包容性(但同样有害)的种植园逻辑形式的例子,并关键地确定了这些种植园逻辑的延伸是如何被抵抗因子所利用的,从社会运动到疾病和瘟疫。我们考虑通过哥伦比亚可持续棕榈油圆桌会议(RSPO)的棕榈油可持续性认证,以及印度旨在抵消单一种植种植园对森林破坏的补偿性造林项目。最后,我们强调了废除生态学如何作为种植园逻辑的解毒剂,并强调了自我反思、修复和集体团结之间的必要关系,这是对种植园生态进行撤资所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Political Ecology
Journal of Political Ecology ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
17.40%
发文量
47
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Political Ecology is a peer reviewed journal (ISSN: 1073-0451), one of the longest standing, Gold Open Access journals in the social sciences. It began in 1994 and welcomes submissions in English, French and Spanish. We encourage research into the linkages between political economy and human environmental impacts across different locations and academic disciplines. The approach used in the journal is political ecology, not other fields, and authors should state clearly how their work contributes to, or extends, this approach. See, for example, the POLLEN network, or the ENTITLE blog.
期刊最新文献
The political ecologies of "green" extractivism(s): An introduction  Indigenous onto-epistemology and the Niyamgiri Movement in India Justice in fishing territories: Human rights violations in artisanal fisheries analyzed by the Colombian Constitutional Court Hydropolitical potentialities in a post-'Day Zero' Cape Town: "Sensemaking" and the Cape Flats Aquifer Review of Benally, Klee. 2023. No spiritual surrender: Indigenous anarchy in defense of the sacred
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1