Heidegger's fundamental ontology and the human good in Aristotelian ethics

IF 0.8 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY SOUTHERN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1111/sjp.12545
John Hacker‐Wright
{"title":"Heidegger's fundamental ontology and the human good in Aristotelian ethics","authors":"John Hacker‐Wright","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Neo‐Aristotelian ethical naturalists take the concept “human” to be central to practical philosophy. According to this view, practical philosophy aims at a distinctive human good that defines its subject matter. Hence, practical philosophy can survive neither the elimination of the concept nor its subsumption under a more general concept, such as that of the rational agent. The challenge central to properly formulating Aristotelian naturalism is: How can the concept of the human be specified in a way that captures the distinctive role that it is supposed to play in practical philosophy? For the view to be sustained, the concept “human” as it figures in practical philosophy must not designate rationality plus a set of facts that we learn empirically about ourselves and then consider from a detached standpoint of reason. Heidegger's existential analytic offers an approach to addressing the challenge to neo‐Aristotelian naturalism and, therefore, a way of capturing the sui generis human good. I aim to show that concepts of the existential analytic in Being and Time have their origin or parallels in readings of Aristotle and that they capture the distinctive character of the being that we are, exclusively, completely, and as a unity. I argue that fundamental ontology offers a way to grasp the integral unity and irreplaceability of the human that lies at the heart of the neo‐Aristotelian project.","PeriodicalId":46350,"journal":{"name":"SOUTHERN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY","volume":"11 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOUTHERN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12545","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Neo‐Aristotelian ethical naturalists take the concept “human” to be central to practical philosophy. According to this view, practical philosophy aims at a distinctive human good that defines its subject matter. Hence, practical philosophy can survive neither the elimination of the concept nor its subsumption under a more general concept, such as that of the rational agent. The challenge central to properly formulating Aristotelian naturalism is: How can the concept of the human be specified in a way that captures the distinctive role that it is supposed to play in practical philosophy? For the view to be sustained, the concept “human” as it figures in practical philosophy must not designate rationality plus a set of facts that we learn empirically about ourselves and then consider from a detached standpoint of reason. Heidegger's existential analytic offers an approach to addressing the challenge to neo‐Aristotelian naturalism and, therefore, a way of capturing the sui generis human good. I aim to show that concepts of the existential analytic in Being and Time have their origin or parallels in readings of Aristotle and that they capture the distinctive character of the being that we are, exclusively, completely, and as a unity. I argue that fundamental ontology offers a way to grasp the integral unity and irreplaceability of the human that lies at the heart of the neo‐Aristotelian project.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海德格尔的基本本体论与亚里士多德伦理学中的人的善
新亚里士多德伦理自然主义者将“人”的概念作为实践哲学的核心。根据这种观点,实践哲学的目标是定义其主题的独特的人类善。因此,实践哲学既不能消除概念,也不能将其纳入更一般的概念,如理性主体的概念。正确表述亚里士多德自然主义的核心挑战是:人类的概念如何以一种能够捕捉到它在实践哲学中应该扮演的独特角色的方式被指定?为了使这一观点站得住脚,实践哲学中的“人”这个概念不能把理性加上一系列我们从经验中了解到的关于我们自己的事实,然后从理性的超然立场来考虑。海德格尔的存在分析提供了一种方法来解决对新亚里士多德自然主义的挑战,因此,一种捕捉自属的人类善的方法。我的目的是要说明,在《存在与时间》中,存在分析的概念在亚里士多德的解读中有其起源或相似之处,它们捕捉到了我们存在的独特特征,即我们是唯一的、完整的、作为一个整体的存在。我认为,基本本体论提供了一种方法来把握人类的整体统一性和不可替代性,这是新亚里士多德计划的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Southern Journal of Philosophy has long provided a forum for the expression of philosophical ideas and welcome articles written from all philosophical perspectives, including both the analytic and continental traditions, as well as the history of philosophy. This commitment to philosophical pluralism is reflected in the long list of notable figures whose work has appeared in the journal, including Hans-Georg Gadamer, Hubert Dreyfus, George Santayana, Wilfrid Sellars, and Richard Sorabji.
期刊最新文献
Why inconsistent intentional states underlie our grasp of objects On neutral value and fitting indifference Jorge Portilla on philosophy and agential liberation The wrong of refugee containment Heidegger's fundamental ontology and the human good in Aristotelian ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1