Minority faith and environmental justice

IF 1.4 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics & Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1111/polp.12564
Sumaia A. Al‐Kohlani, Heather E. Campbell, Stephen Omar El‐Khatib
{"title":"Minority faith and environmental justice","authors":"Sumaia A. Al‐Kohlani, Heather E. Campbell, Stephen Omar El‐Khatib","doi":"10.1111/polp.12564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Decades of research indicate that most Census‐measured U.S. racial and ethnic minorities are disproportionately impacted by environmental disamenities, all else equal; the study of this is referred to as Environmental Justice (EJ) research. Yet both U.S. and world history show that another minoritized group is religious minorities. If so, this has health consequences and policy implications. Houses of worship (HOWs) are visible and physical symbols of religion. We use tax records to locate Jewish, Muslim, and Buddhist or Hindu HOWs within census tracts for the entire contiguous United States. We combine these data with EJSCREEN data to analyze whether air pollution risks are greater in their presence. We find that, even holding constant race, ethnicity, and poverty, two non‐census‐measured religious minorities' HOWs are disproportionately impacted by air pollution in the United States: Jews and Muslims. This new knowledge has consequences for EJ policy and social justice‐motivated environmental research. Related Articles Ash, John. 2010. “New Nuclear Energy, Risk, and Justice: Regulatory Strategies for an Era of Limited Trust.” Politics & Policy 38(2): 255–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2010.00237.x . Fowler, Luke. 2022. “Searching for Green Elephants and Other Mythical Creatures during the Trump Years: Partisanship and Congressional Voting on Environmental Legislation.” Politics & Policy 50(5): 913–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12499 . Tubadji, Annie. 2023. “You'll Never Walk Alone: Loneliness, Religion, and Politico‐economic Transformation.” Politics & Policy 51(4): 661–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12538 .","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"79 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Decades of research indicate that most Census‐measured U.S. racial and ethnic minorities are disproportionately impacted by environmental disamenities, all else equal; the study of this is referred to as Environmental Justice (EJ) research. Yet both U.S. and world history show that another minoritized group is religious minorities. If so, this has health consequences and policy implications. Houses of worship (HOWs) are visible and physical symbols of religion. We use tax records to locate Jewish, Muslim, and Buddhist or Hindu HOWs within census tracts for the entire contiguous United States. We combine these data with EJSCREEN data to analyze whether air pollution risks are greater in their presence. We find that, even holding constant race, ethnicity, and poverty, two non‐census‐measured religious minorities' HOWs are disproportionately impacted by air pollution in the United States: Jews and Muslims. This new knowledge has consequences for EJ policy and social justice‐motivated environmental research. Related Articles Ash, John. 2010. “New Nuclear Energy, Risk, and Justice: Regulatory Strategies for an Era of Limited Trust.” Politics & Policy 38(2): 255–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2010.00237.x . Fowler, Luke. 2022. “Searching for Green Elephants and Other Mythical Creatures during the Trump Years: Partisanship and Congressional Voting on Environmental Legislation.” Politics & Policy 50(5): 913–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12499 . Tubadji, Annie. 2023. “You'll Never Walk Alone: Loneliness, Religion, and Politico‐economic Transformation.” Politics & Policy 51(4): 661–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12538 .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
少数派信仰和环境正义
几十年的研究表明,在其他条件相同的情况下,大多数人口普查测量的美国种族和少数民族受到环境不利因素的不成比例的影响;这方面的研究被称为环境正义(EJ)研究。然而,美国和世界历史都表明,另一个少数群体是宗教少数群体。如果是这样,这将产生健康后果和政策影响。礼拜堂(HOWs)是宗教的有形象征。我们使用税务记录在整个美国连续的人口普查区内定位犹太教徒、穆斯林教徒、佛教徒或印度教教徒。我们将这些数据与EJSCREEN数据结合起来,分析它们存在时空气污染风险是否更大。我们发现,即使保持种族、民族和贫困不变,两种非人口普查测量的宗教少数群体受到美国空气污染的影响不成比例:犹太人和穆斯林。这一新知识对环境政策和社会正义驱动的环境研究产生了影响。约翰。阿什。2010。新核能、风险与正义:有限信任时代的监管策略。政治,政策38(2):255-84。https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747 1346.2010.00237.x。卢克·福勒,2022。“在特朗普时代寻找绿象和其他神话生物:党派关系和国会对环境立法的投票。”政治,政策50(5):913-41。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12499。安妮·图巴吉,2023年。《你永远不会独行:孤独、宗教与政治经济转型》政治,政策51(4):661-95。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12538。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Politics & Policy
Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
61
期刊最新文献
Issue Information “Where you stand depends on where you sit”: The politics of petroleum pricing in Ghana's election cycle Note from the Editor and Acknowledgment of Reviewers 2023–2024 A paradox of public engagement: The discursive politics of environmental justice in Canada's Chemical Valley Democratic interventionists versus pragmatic realists: Employing the advocacy coalition framework to explain Obama's shift in multilateralism with European allies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1