The Weimar/Russia Comparison Revisited

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Russian Politics Pub Date : 2023-10-18 DOI:10.30965/24518921-00803007
Stephen E. Hanson, Jeffrey S Kopstein
{"title":"The Weimar/Russia Comparison Revisited","authors":"Stephen E. Hanson, Jeffrey S Kopstein","doi":"10.30965/24518921-00803007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Just over a quarter-century ago, the authors published a widely read essay comparing Weimar Germany and Post-Soviet Russia in historical perspective. After Russia’s unprovoked assault on Ukraine, comparisons of Vladimir Putin’s regime with Nazi Germany are once again tragically relevant. Reexamining our arguments from 1997 shows the continuing relevance of the variables we emphasized in that essay: the burdensome legacies of the past imperial regime, intense international pressure to marketize post-Soviet Russia’s statist economy, and Russia’s weak party system. Three main issues in our earlier article, in retrospect, required greater development: pinpointing the time span needed to assess regime change, distinguishing mobilizational and patrimonial forms of ‘anti-liberal statism,’ and exploring more fully the foreign policy options for would-be defenders of the liberal global order facing powerful revanchist challenges. We conclude that this sort of ‘replication’ of earlier research should be encouraged more often among political scientists adopting the comparative-historical approach.","PeriodicalId":37176,"journal":{"name":"Russian Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/24518921-00803007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Just over a quarter-century ago, the authors published a widely read essay comparing Weimar Germany and Post-Soviet Russia in historical perspective. After Russia’s unprovoked assault on Ukraine, comparisons of Vladimir Putin’s regime with Nazi Germany are once again tragically relevant. Reexamining our arguments from 1997 shows the continuing relevance of the variables we emphasized in that essay: the burdensome legacies of the past imperial regime, intense international pressure to marketize post-Soviet Russia’s statist economy, and Russia’s weak party system. Three main issues in our earlier article, in retrospect, required greater development: pinpointing the time span needed to assess regime change, distinguishing mobilizational and patrimonial forms of ‘anti-liberal statism,’ and exploring more fully the foreign policy options for would-be defenders of the liberal global order facing powerful revanchist challenges. We conclude that this sort of ‘replication’ of earlier research should be encouraged more often among political scientists adopting the comparative-historical approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
魏玛与俄罗斯的比较再看
就在25年前,作者发表了一篇广为流传的文章,从历史的角度比较了魏玛德国和后苏联时期的俄罗斯。在俄罗斯无端攻击乌克兰之后,弗拉基米尔•普京(Vladimir Putin)政权与纳粹德国的对比再一次具有悲剧性。重新审视我们从1997年开始的论点,会发现我们在那篇文章中强调的变量仍然具有相关性:过去帝国政权的繁重遗产,后苏联时代俄罗斯中央集权经济市场化的巨大国际压力,以及俄罗斯薄弱的政党制度。回顾过去,我们之前文章中的三个主要问题需要更大的发展:确定评估政权更迭所需的时间跨度,区分“反自由主义国家主义”的动员形式和世袭形式,以及更全面地探索面对强大复仇主义挑战的自由主义全球秩序的潜在捍卫者的外交政策选择。我们的结论是,采用比较历史方法的政治科学家应该更经常地鼓励这种对早期研究的“复制”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Russian Politics
Russian Politics Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Non-execution of Strasbourg Judgments against Russia: the Case for a Trust Fund Resisting Strasbourg to Reassure Moscow: the Recent Story of the Russian Constitutional Court Pushback or Backlash against the European Court of Human Rights? Authoritarian Sovereignization: Russia’s Way out of the Council of Europe Conservative Jurisprudence and Russia’s Response to ECtHR Judgements on Cases of Domestic Violence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1