Dynamic relationship among immediate release fentanyl use and cancer incidence: A multivariate time-series analysis using vector autoregressive models

Diana González-Bermejo, Belén Castillo-Cano, Alfonso Rodríguez-Pascual, Pilar Rayón-Iglesias, Dolores Montero-Corominas, Consuelo Huerta-Álvarez
{"title":"Dynamic relationship among immediate release fentanyl use and cancer incidence: A multivariate time-series analysis using vector autoregressive models","authors":"Diana González-Bermejo, Belén Castillo-Cano, Alfonso Rodríguez-Pascual, Pilar Rayón-Iglesias, Dolores Montero-Corominas, Consuelo Huerta-Álvarez","doi":"10.1177/26320843231206357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A substantial increase in the incidence of immediate release fentanyl (IRF) use was reported in Spain from 2012 to 2017. Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the relationship dynamically with cancer incidence in order to provide empirical evidence of inappropriate use of IRF with respect to the pathology. Research design: A vector autoregresive (VAR) model was constructed using data from a nationwide electronic healthcare record database in primary care in Spain (BIFAP) according to the following step procedure: (1) split data into training data for modelling and test for validation (2) assessing for time series stationarity; (3) selecting lag-length; (4) building the VAR model; (5) assessing residual autocorrelation; (6) checking stability of the VAR system; (7) evaluating Granger causality; (8) impulse response analysis and forecast error variance decomposition (9) prediction performance with validation data. Results: The analysis showed a strong and linear correlation between IRF and cancer (Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.594 (95% CI: 0.420–0.726). Two VAR models, VAR (2) and VAR (11) were selected and compared. All tests performed for both models satisfied assumptions for stability, predictability and accuracy. Granger causality revealed cancer incidence is a good predictor for IRF use. VAR (2) seemed to be slightly more accurate, according to the RMSE of the test data. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that using a robust and structured VAR modelling approach, is able to estimate dynamics associations, involving IRF use and cancer incidence.","PeriodicalId":74683,"journal":{"name":"Research methods in medicine & health sciences","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research methods in medicine & health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26320843231206357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A substantial increase in the incidence of immediate release fentanyl (IRF) use was reported in Spain from 2012 to 2017. Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the relationship dynamically with cancer incidence in order to provide empirical evidence of inappropriate use of IRF with respect to the pathology. Research design: A vector autoregresive (VAR) model was constructed using data from a nationwide electronic healthcare record database in primary care in Spain (BIFAP) according to the following step procedure: (1) split data into training data for modelling and test for validation (2) assessing for time series stationarity; (3) selecting lag-length; (4) building the VAR model; (5) assessing residual autocorrelation; (6) checking stability of the VAR system; (7) evaluating Granger causality; (8) impulse response analysis and forecast error variance decomposition (9) prediction performance with validation data. Results: The analysis showed a strong and linear correlation between IRF and cancer (Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.594 (95% CI: 0.420–0.726). Two VAR models, VAR (2) and VAR (11) were selected and compared. All tests performed for both models satisfied assumptions for stability, predictability and accuracy. Granger causality revealed cancer incidence is a good predictor for IRF use. VAR (2) seemed to be slightly more accurate, according to the RMSE of the test data. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that using a robust and structured VAR modelling approach, is able to estimate dynamics associations, involving IRF use and cancer incidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
即时释放芬太尼使用与癌症发病率的动态关系:使用向量自回归模型的多变量时间序列分析
背景:据报道,从2012年到2017年,西班牙立即释放芬太尼(IRF)的使用发生率大幅增加。目的:本研究旨在动态探讨IRF与肿瘤发病率的关系,为IRF在病理上的不当使用提供经验证据。研究设计:使用西班牙全国初级保健电子医疗记录数据库(BIFAP)的数据,按照以下步骤构建向量自回归(VAR)模型:(1)将数据分成训练数据进行建模和验证检验;(2)评估时间序列平稳性;(3)选择滞后长度;(4)建立VAR模型;(5)残差自相关评估;(6)检查VAR系统的稳定性;(7)格兰杰因果关系评价;(8)脉冲响应分析与预测误差方差分解(9)利用验证数据预测性能。结果:分析显示IRF与癌症之间有很强的线性相关性(Pearson相关系数:0.594 (95% CI: 0.420-0.726)。选取VAR(2)和VAR(11)两个VAR模型进行比较。对两种模型进行的所有测试都满足稳定性、可预测性和准确性的假设。格兰杰因果关系显示,癌症发病率是IRF使用的良好预测因子。根据测试数据的RMSE, VAR(2)似乎更准确一些。结论:本研究表明,使用稳健和结构化的VAR建模方法,能够估计涉及IRF使用和癌症发病率的动态关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Choice of Link Functions for Generalized Linear Mixed Models in Meta-Analyses of Proportions. Disclosure of suicidal ideation in non-psychiatric clinical research: Experience using a novel suicide risk management algorithm in a multi-center smoking cessation trial Dynamic relationship among immediate release fentanyl use and cancer incidence: A multivariate time-series analysis using vector autoregressive models Monitoring metrics over time: Why clinical trialists need to systematically collect site performance metrics. Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1