Conceptualization of budgeting in the paradigm of institutionalism

Tetiana ZHYBER, Olena TYMCHENKO
{"title":"Conceptualization of budgeting in the paradigm of institutionalism","authors":"Tetiana ZHYBER, Olena TYMCHENKO","doi":"10.33763/finukr2023.08.113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The development of a theoretical and methodological concept of budgeting in public finance is necessary and important for Ukraine, which does not have its own long tradition of the budgeting technologies developing on the democratic principles. Considering the fact that budgeting takes place in an institutional environment, it is reasonable to substantiate the conceptual foundations of budgeting in the paradigm of institutionalism. Problem Statement. A systematized presentation of the conceptual foundations of budgeting as a macro-level financial and management technology with the specification of elements, conditions and principles remains an unresolved task. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the conceptual foundations of modern budgeting as a financial and management technology aimed at ensuring public welfare, to identify the components of budgeting, to expand and deepen their characteristics compared to the previous developments, to substantiate the principles of budgeting. Methods. The authors base their research on the methodology of institutionalism. They use evolutionistic approach to argue for the institutional nature of budgeting; systemic approach and theoretical generalizations - for conceptualizing budgeting; graphic interpretation - for a visualization of the components of budgeting as a financial and management technology. Results. The authors reveal the evolutionary changes in the development of budgeting technologies, give the definition of budgeting in public finance, identify the elements of budgeting, determine the sequence of budgeting stages as a process aimed at ensuring sustainable development and growth of the welfare of society, and substantiate the principles of budgeting. Conclusions. Budgeting in public finance is a management technology, the content of which is revealed in two aspects: 1) as a set of techniques, tools and methods; 2) as a process consisting of successive stages: from setting the goals and tasks of socio-economic development to evaluating effectiveness and efficiency. With the evolution of the state, approaches changed and different budgeting technologies were formed. The main task of financial and management engineering is the correct choice and combination of various budgeting technologies or their components to achieve the desirable result.","PeriodicalId":209191,"journal":{"name":"Fìnansi Ukraïni","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fìnansi Ukraïni","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2023.08.113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The development of a theoretical and methodological concept of budgeting in public finance is necessary and important for Ukraine, which does not have its own long tradition of the budgeting technologies developing on the democratic principles. Considering the fact that budgeting takes place in an institutional environment, it is reasonable to substantiate the conceptual foundations of budgeting in the paradigm of institutionalism. Problem Statement. A systematized presentation of the conceptual foundations of budgeting as a macro-level financial and management technology with the specification of elements, conditions and principles remains an unresolved task. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the conceptual foundations of modern budgeting as a financial and management technology aimed at ensuring public welfare, to identify the components of budgeting, to expand and deepen their characteristics compared to the previous developments, to substantiate the principles of budgeting. Methods. The authors base their research on the methodology of institutionalism. They use evolutionistic approach to argue for the institutional nature of budgeting; systemic approach and theoretical generalizations - for conceptualizing budgeting; graphic interpretation - for a visualization of the components of budgeting as a financial and management technology. Results. The authors reveal the evolutionary changes in the development of budgeting technologies, give the definition of budgeting in public finance, identify the elements of budgeting, determine the sequence of budgeting stages as a process aimed at ensuring sustainable development and growth of the welfare of society, and substantiate the principles of budgeting. Conclusions. Budgeting in public finance is a management technology, the content of which is revealed in two aspects: 1) as a set of techniques, tools and methods; 2) as a process consisting of successive stages: from setting the goals and tasks of socio-economic development to evaluating effectiveness and efficiency. With the evolution of the state, approaches changed and different budgeting technologies were formed. The main task of financial and management engineering is the correct choice and combination of various budgeting technologies or their components to achieve the desirable result.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制度主义范式下预算的概念化
介绍。发展公共财政预算的理论和方法概念对乌克兰来说是必要和重要的,因为乌克兰没有自己在民主原则基础上发展预算技术的悠久传统。考虑到预算是在制度环境中进行的,在制度主义范式中确证预算的概念基础是合理的。问题陈述。将预算编制的概念基础系统地作为宏观一级的财务和管理技术加以说明,并具体说明要素、条件和原则,仍然是一项未解决的任务。本文的目的是充实现代预算作为一种以确保公共福利为目的的财务和管理技术的概念基础,确定预算的组成部分,与以往的发展相比,扩大和深化它们的特点,充实预算的原则。方法。作者的研究基于制度主义的方法论。他们用进化论的方法来论证预算的制度本质;系统方法和理论概括-预算概念化;图形解释-作为财务和管理技术的预算组成部分的可视化。结果。揭示了预算技术发展的演化变化,给出了公共财政预算的定义,明确了预算的要素,确定了预算的阶段顺序,以确保社会福利的可持续发展和增长,并充实了预算的原则。结论。公共财政预算是一种管理技术,其内容表现在两个方面:1)预算是一套技术、工具和方法;2)作为一个由连续阶段组成的过程:从设定社会经济发展的目标和任务到评价效果和效率。随着国家的发展,方法发生了变化,形成了不同的预算技术。财务与管理工程的主要任务是正确选择和组合各种预算技术或其组成部分,以达到理想的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Financial support for the recovery of Ukraine’s economy Market conditions and the role of the state in post-war economic recovery of Ukraine Metodological and software support for the implementation of electronic document circulation at the level of local budgets using the “ISC Local budget” software Highlighting the problems of terrorism and its financing in the process of training specialists in financial monitoring Public expenditures in crisis periods: empirical testing of developed countries and Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1