The impact of the Digital Content Directive on online platforms’ Terms of Service

Katarzyna Wiśniewska, Przemysław Pałka
{"title":"The impact of the Digital Content Directive on online platforms’ Terms of Service","authors":"Katarzyna Wiśniewska, Przemysław Pałka","doi":"10.1093/yel/yead004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Digital Content Directive 2019/770 (the DCD), aiming to foster the Digital Single Market and improve consumer protection, became applicable on 1 January 2022. This article presents the results of the study of 100 Terms of Service (ToS) of online platforms, conducted to evaluate the Directive’s impact. By combining black letter analysis with qualitative and quantitative empirical research, the contribution sheds new light on the Directive’s assumptions, critically assesses its logic, and makes regulatory suggestions for European lawmakers. Our central finding is that a significant number of the studied contracts (28 per cent) do not contain descriptions of the digital content offered. Many of those that do, keep the descriptions extremely vague. Hence, the central institution of the Directive—conformity with the contract—might be less valuable than the lawmakers have assumed. Even though the DCD introduces the concept of ‘objective’ conformity, we show how, in the digital environment, it might lower legal certainty, defeating one of the purposes of the Directive. Moreover, we also demonstrate how the analysed ToS often fail to meet other requirements, such as the right to retrieve one’s content or the protection from unilateral content deletion. This begs the question about the regulatory approach, the efficacy of the chosen enforcement scheme and, more generally, the enforcement schemes used throughout the EU’s private law. To remedy these problems, we suggest engaging in more empirical research when designing future measures to protect consumers online and considering supplementing the existing enforcement schemes with administrative oversight like the one in the Digital Services Act.","PeriodicalId":41752,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yead004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The Digital Content Directive 2019/770 (the DCD), aiming to foster the Digital Single Market and improve consumer protection, became applicable on 1 January 2022. This article presents the results of the study of 100 Terms of Service (ToS) of online platforms, conducted to evaluate the Directive’s impact. By combining black letter analysis with qualitative and quantitative empirical research, the contribution sheds new light on the Directive’s assumptions, critically assesses its logic, and makes regulatory suggestions for European lawmakers. Our central finding is that a significant number of the studied contracts (28 per cent) do not contain descriptions of the digital content offered. Many of those that do, keep the descriptions extremely vague. Hence, the central institution of the Directive—conformity with the contract—might be less valuable than the lawmakers have assumed. Even though the DCD introduces the concept of ‘objective’ conformity, we show how, in the digital environment, it might lower legal certainty, defeating one of the purposes of the Directive. Moreover, we also demonstrate how the analysed ToS often fail to meet other requirements, such as the right to retrieve one’s content or the protection from unilateral content deletion. This begs the question about the regulatory approach, the efficacy of the chosen enforcement scheme and, more generally, the enforcement schemes used throughout the EU’s private law. To remedy these problems, we suggest engaging in more empirical research when designing future measures to protect consumers online and considering supplementing the existing enforcement schemes with administrative oversight like the one in the Digital Services Act.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字内容指令对在线平台服务条款的影响
旨在促进数字单一市场和改善消费者保护的数字内容指令2019/770 (DCD)于2022年1月1日生效。本文介绍了对100个在线平台服务条款(ToS)的研究结果,旨在评估该指令的影响。通过将黑字分析与定性和定量实证研究相结合,该贡献揭示了指令的假设,批判性地评估了其逻辑,并为欧洲立法者提出了监管建议。我们的主要发现是,大量被研究的合同(28%)不包含对所提供数字内容的描述。许多这样做的公司,其描述都非常模糊。因此,指令的中心制度——与合同的一致性——可能没有立法者假设的那么有价值。尽管DCD引入了“客观”符合性的概念,但我们表明,在数字环境中,它可能会降低法律确定性,违背指令的目的之一。此外,我们还展示了所分析的ToS如何经常无法满足其他要求,例如检索内容的权利或防止单方面删除内容的保护。这就引出了有关监管方法、所选择的执法方案的效力,以及更普遍地说,整个欧盟私法中使用的执法方案的问题。为了解决这些问题,我们建议在设计未来保护在线消费者的措施时进行更多的实证研究,并考虑用《数字服务法》(Digital Services Act)等行政监督来补充现有的执法方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
The unified patent court Corporate tax reform in the European Union: are the stars finally aligned? Rescuing transparency in the digital economy: in search of a common notion in EU consumer and data protection law The impact of the Digital Content Directive on online platforms’ Terms of Service The European Union’s Preferential Trade Agreements: between convergence and differentiation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1