Adat Law-Making Process

Sartika Intaning Pradhani
{"title":"Adat Law-Making Process","authors":"Sartika Intaning Pradhani","doi":"10.1163/15718115-bja10128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study aims to analyse the emerging need to change customary law ( adat law in Indonesia) and identify the role of adat functionaries. The experience of the Mollo adat law community (indigenous people) from the south-eastern part of Indonesia, Timor Island, shows that the sudden and massive collection of haukonof ( Usnea barbata ), a non-timber forest product, has caused forest destruction. How do the adat functionaries respond to the situation? Is adat law sufficient to respond to the sudden change of their livelihood? If it is not, then what to do? Furthermore, what are the impacts on the functionaries? What are their difficulties, and how do they solve them? This article is based on an in-depth ethnographic study held in July—September 2021. Data are collected through interviews and observation. The adat functionaries want to restrict the people from picking and collecting haukonof , but there is no adat law specifically ruling on it. Only the adat functionaries should protect the environment. The pickers and the collectors of haukonof are the members of the communities. The kinship relation between the functionaries and the members complicates legal enforcement. The adat functionaries’ authority and the sustainability of the livelihoods are in danger. The immediate solution is borrowing state law which obliges a person who utilises non-timber forest products in the Protection Forest to hold a valid permit. It effectively reduces the number of haukonof picking and collection by the community members. Adat’s law-making process does not work in isolation. It is an interactive process that needs continuous foresight observation from the adat functionaries to find the appropriate solution to protect the environment and the people.","PeriodicalId":44103,"journal":{"name":"International Journal on Minority and Group Rights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal on Minority and Group Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-bja10128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to analyse the emerging need to change customary law ( adat law in Indonesia) and identify the role of adat functionaries. The experience of the Mollo adat law community (indigenous people) from the south-eastern part of Indonesia, Timor Island, shows that the sudden and massive collection of haukonof ( Usnea barbata ), a non-timber forest product, has caused forest destruction. How do the adat functionaries respond to the situation? Is adat law sufficient to respond to the sudden change of their livelihood? If it is not, then what to do? Furthermore, what are the impacts on the functionaries? What are their difficulties, and how do they solve them? This article is based on an in-depth ethnographic study held in July—September 2021. Data are collected through interviews and observation. The adat functionaries want to restrict the people from picking and collecting haukonof , but there is no adat law specifically ruling on it. Only the adat functionaries should protect the environment. The pickers and the collectors of haukonof are the members of the communities. The kinship relation between the functionaries and the members complicates legal enforcement. The adat functionaries’ authority and the sustainability of the livelihoods are in danger. The immediate solution is borrowing state law which obliges a person who utilises non-timber forest products in the Protection Forest to hold a valid permit. It effectively reduces the number of haukonof picking and collection by the community members. Adat’s law-making process does not work in isolation. It is an interactive process that needs continuous foresight observation from the adat functionaries to find the appropriate solution to protect the environment and the people.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立法过程
摘要本研究旨在分析改变习惯法(印度尼西亚的习惯法)的新兴需求,并确定习惯法官员的作用。来自印度尼西亚东南部帝汶岛的Mollo adat law社区(土著人民)的经验表明,突然大量采集一种非木材林产品haukonof (Usnea barbata)造成了森林的破坏。adat官员如何应对这种情况?法律是否足以应对他们生计的突然变化?如果不是,那该怎么办?此外,对工作人员的影响是什么?他们的困难是什么,他们是如何解决的?本文基于2021年7月至9月进行的一项深入的民族志研究。通过访谈和观察收集数据。地方官员想要限制人们采摘和收集松果,但没有专门的法律对此作出规定。只有政府官员才应该保护环境。haukonof的采摘者和收集者是社区的成员。公务员与党员之间的亲属关系使执法复杂化。adat官员的权威和生计的可持续性都处于危险之中。直接的解决办法是借用州法律,规定在保护林使用非木材林产品的人必须持有有效的许可证。它有效地减少了社区成员捡捡垃圾的次数。Adat的立法过程并不是孤立的。这是一个互动的过程,需要行政官员不断的前瞻性观察,才能找到保护环境和人民的适当解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
The Middle Belt Factor in the Nigeria-Biafra War, 1967–1975 The Othering of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community The Universal Periodic Review and West Papua: Beyond Invisibility? Representation of Indian Christians and their ‘othering’ in Mainstream Indian Cinema, a Critical Evaluation National Minorities in the Odesa Oblast – Applying the European Model to Ensure Peaceful Coexistence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1