Influence factors on the quality of regulatory impact analysis in Brazil

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1080/14615517.2023.2268996
Flavio Saab, Suylan de Almeida Midlej e Silva
{"title":"Influence factors on the quality of regulatory impact analysis in Brazil","authors":"Flavio Saab, Suylan de Almeida Midlej e Silva","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2023.2268996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTRegulatory impact analysis – RIA – emerged as one of the tools that can provide the regulator with greater capacity to understand the impacts of his/her decisions. Its use promotes increased rigor to the process of creating rules, by collecting empirical data, evidence, and information that help decision making. However, studies carried out around the world show relevant inconsistencies in using RIA, including in Brazil. Therefore, this study sought to investigate the factors that influence RIA quality in the country. After conducting document search and interviews with managers of Brazilian regulatory agencies, we identified that RIA’s low quality can be explained by factors linked to the bureaucratic context, the political process, the influence of actors, the procedures adopted, and the level of knowledge of civil servants.KEYWORDS: Regulatory impact analysisRIAregulationquality Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":47528,"journal":{"name":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","volume":"5 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2023.2268996","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTRegulatory impact analysis – RIA – emerged as one of the tools that can provide the regulator with greater capacity to understand the impacts of his/her decisions. Its use promotes increased rigor to the process of creating rules, by collecting empirical data, evidence, and information that help decision making. However, studies carried out around the world show relevant inconsistencies in using RIA, including in Brazil. Therefore, this study sought to investigate the factors that influence RIA quality in the country. After conducting document search and interviews with managers of Brazilian regulatory agencies, we identified that RIA’s low quality can be explained by factors linked to the bureaucratic context, the political process, the influence of actors, the procedures adopted, and the level of knowledge of civil servants.KEYWORDS: Regulatory impact analysisRIAregulationquality Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响巴西监管影响分析质量的因素
监管影响分析(RIA)作为一种工具出现,可以为监管机构提供更大的能力来理解他/她的决策的影响。它的使用通过收集有助于决策的经验数据、证据和信息,提高了创建规则过程的严谨性。然而,在世界各地进行的研究表明,在使用RIA方面存在相关的不一致,包括在巴西。因此,本研究试图探讨影响我国RIA质量的因素。在对巴西监管机构的管理人员进行文件检索和访谈后,我们发现RIA的低质量可以通过与官僚环境、政治过程、行为者的影响、所采用的程序和公务员的知识水平相关的因素来解释。关键词:监管影响分析监管质量披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
22.70%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: This is the international, peer-reviewed journal of the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA). It covers environmental, social, health and other impact assessments, cost-benefit analysis, technology assessment, and other approaches to anticipating and managing impacts. It has readers in universities, government and public agencies, consultancies, NGOs and elsewhere in over 100 countries. It has editorials, main articles, book reviews, and a professional practice section.
期刊最新文献
A game theoretic decision-making approach to reduce mine closure risks throughout the mine-life cycle Consideration of risks to people and the environment related to accidents on natural gas transmission pipelines in LUP and SEA processes in Poland Landscape, EIA and decision-making. A case study of the Vistula Spit Canal, Poland SEA and EIA: uncertain boundaries in Spain Influence factors on the quality of regulatory impact analysis in Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1