Robotic Liver Resection: Report of Institutional First 100 Cases

IF 0.1 Q4 SURGERY Surgical Techniques Development Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.3390/std12040017
Maria Conticchio, Antonella Delvecchio, Valentina Ferraro, Matteo Stasi, Annachiara Casella, Rosalinda Filippo, Michele Tedeschi, Alba Fiorentino, Riccardo Memeo
{"title":"Robotic Liver Resection: Report of Institutional First 100 Cases","authors":"Maria Conticchio, Antonella Delvecchio, Valentina Ferraro, Matteo Stasi, Annachiara Casella, Rosalinda Filippo, Michele Tedeschi, Alba Fiorentino, Riccardo Memeo","doi":"10.3390/std12040017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Backgrounds: Liver surgery has developed progressively during the last 10 years, especially in minimally invasive approaches. Robotic surgery seemed to overcome laparoscopic limitations with 3D visualization, the increased degrees of freedom given with Endowrist instruments, tremor filtering, better dexterity, and improved ergonomics for the surgeon. Methods: This work was a retrospective analysis of our first 100 robotic hepatectomies from March 2020 to July 2022. Patient demographics characteristics and intra- and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total of 59 males and 41 females, with a median age of 68 years, underwent a robotic liver resection. The indications for robotic liver resections were malignant lesions in 86% of patients. Anatomical resection (AR) was undertaken in 27% of cases and non-anatomical resection (NAR) in 63% of cases. None of the patients were converted to the ‘open’ approach. Postoperative complications were as follows: 1% of biliary leakage, 5% of ascites, 6% of pulmonary infections, and 3% of other sites’ infections. CONCLUSIONS Our results showed the satisfactory experience of a tertiary HPB center with its first 100 robotic liver resections. The opportunity to make the robotic approach routinary provided global growth of a surgical team, improving the quality of patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":40379,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Techniques Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Techniques Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/std12040017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds: Liver surgery has developed progressively during the last 10 years, especially in minimally invasive approaches. Robotic surgery seemed to overcome laparoscopic limitations with 3D visualization, the increased degrees of freedom given with Endowrist instruments, tremor filtering, better dexterity, and improved ergonomics for the surgeon. Methods: This work was a retrospective analysis of our first 100 robotic hepatectomies from March 2020 to July 2022. Patient demographics characteristics and intra- and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total of 59 males and 41 females, with a median age of 68 years, underwent a robotic liver resection. The indications for robotic liver resections were malignant lesions in 86% of patients. Anatomical resection (AR) was undertaken in 27% of cases and non-anatomical resection (NAR) in 63% of cases. None of the patients were converted to the ‘open’ approach. Postoperative complications were as follows: 1% of biliary leakage, 5% of ascites, 6% of pulmonary infections, and 3% of other sites’ infections. CONCLUSIONS Our results showed the satisfactory experience of a tertiary HPB center with its first 100 robotic liver resections. The opportunity to make the robotic approach routinary provided global growth of a surgical team, improving the quality of patient outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人肝切除术:机构前100例报告
背景:在过去的十年中,肝脏外科手术逐渐发展起来,尤其是微创手术。机器人手术似乎克服了腹腔镜的局限性,具有3D可视化,增加了手腕内器械的自由度,震颤过滤,更好的灵活性,并改善了外科医生的人体工程学。方法:这项工作是对我们从2020年3月到2022年7月的前100例机器人肝切除术进行回顾性分析。分析患者的人口统计学特征和手术内及术后结果。结果:共有59名男性和41名女性接受了机器人肝切除术,中位年龄为68岁。机器人肝切除术的适应症为恶性病变,占86%。27%的病例采用解剖切除(AR), 63%的病例采用非解剖切除(NAR)。没有患者转为“开放”入路。术后并发症:胆漏1%,腹水5%,肺部感染6%,其他部位感染3%。结论:我们的结果显示了三级HPB中心前100例机器人肝脏切除术的满意经验。使机器人方法成为常规的机会提供了外科团队的全球增长,提高了患者结果的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Increased Postoperative Glycemic Variability Is Associated with Increased Revision Surgery Rates in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Fixation Simultaneous Laparoscopic Surgery for Esophageal Achalasia Combined with Epiphrenic Diverticulum: A Case Report Modified Tension Band Wiring Using Only Non-Absorbable Braided Polyblend Sutures for the Treatment of Patellar Fractures The Method of 3D C-arm Navigated AC Joint Stabilization-Surgical Technique Locoregional vs. General Anaesthesia for Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis: A Feasibility Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1