Complications Associated with Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review

IF 0.1 Q4 SURGERY Surgical Techniques Development Pub Date : 2023-11-20 DOI:10.3390/std12040020
Quan Rui Tan, Russell Andrew Wong, Arun-Kumar Kaliya-Perumal, J. Oh
{"title":"Complications Associated with Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review","authors":"Quan Rui Tan, Russell Andrew Wong, Arun-Kumar Kaliya-Perumal, J. Oh","doi":"10.3390/std12040020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main advantage of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) is its ability to provide safe access to the lumbar spine while being a robust interbody fusion technique through a minimally invasive approach. This study reviews the postoperative complications of OLIF, offering a comprehensive understanding of its advantages and disadvantages. A total of 27 studies with 1275 patients were shortlisted based on our selection criteria. Complications were categorized into intra-operative, immediate post-operative, and delayed post-operative and were interpreted based on surgical procedure into stand-alone OLIF, OLIF with posterior stabilisation, and unspecified. Major complications exhibited a pooled prevalence of just 1.7%, whereas the overall pooled prevalence of complications was 24.7%. Among the subgroups, the stand-alone subgroup had the lowest prevalence of complications (14.6%) compared to the unspecified subgroup (29.6%) and the OLIF L2-5 with posterior stabilisation subgroup (25.8%). Similarly, for major complications, the stand-alone subgroup had the lowest prevalence (1.4%), while the OLIF L2-5 with posterior stabilisation subgroup (1.8%) and the unspecified OLIF L2-5 subgroup (1.6%) had higher rates. However, the differences were not statistically significant. In conclusion, the rate of major complications after OLIF is minimal, making it a safe procedure with significant benefits outweighing the risks. The advantages of OLIF L2-5 with posterior stabilisation over stand-alone OLIF L2-5 is a subject of discussion.","PeriodicalId":40379,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Techniques Development","volume":"137 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Techniques Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/std12040020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main advantage of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) is its ability to provide safe access to the lumbar spine while being a robust interbody fusion technique through a minimally invasive approach. This study reviews the postoperative complications of OLIF, offering a comprehensive understanding of its advantages and disadvantages. A total of 27 studies with 1275 patients were shortlisted based on our selection criteria. Complications were categorized into intra-operative, immediate post-operative, and delayed post-operative and were interpreted based on surgical procedure into stand-alone OLIF, OLIF with posterior stabilisation, and unspecified. Major complications exhibited a pooled prevalence of just 1.7%, whereas the overall pooled prevalence of complications was 24.7%. Among the subgroups, the stand-alone subgroup had the lowest prevalence of complications (14.6%) compared to the unspecified subgroup (29.6%) and the OLIF L2-5 with posterior stabilisation subgroup (25.8%). Similarly, for major complications, the stand-alone subgroup had the lowest prevalence (1.4%), while the OLIF L2-5 with posterior stabilisation subgroup (1.8%) and the unspecified OLIF L2-5 subgroup (1.6%) had higher rates. However, the differences were not statistically significant. In conclusion, the rate of major complications after OLIF is minimal, making it a safe procedure with significant benefits outweighing the risks. The advantages of OLIF L2-5 with posterior stabilisation over stand-alone OLIF L2-5 is a subject of discussion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与斜行腰椎椎间融合术相关的并发症:系统回顾
斜行腰椎椎体间融合术(OLIF)的主要优点是能够安全地进入腰椎,同时通过微创方法实现稳健的椎体间融合技术。本研究回顾了 OLIF 的术后并发症,对其优缺点有了全面的了解。根据我们的选择标准,共筛选出 27 项研究,涉及 1275 名患者。研究将并发症分为术中、术后即刻和术后延迟三类,并根据手术方式将并发症分为单独的OLIF、OLIF伴后路稳定和未指定三种。主要并发症的总发生率仅为1.7%,而并发症的总发生率为24.7%。在各分组中,独立分组的并发症发生率最低(14.6%),相比之下,未指定分组的并发症发生率为29.6%,OLIF L2-5 后方稳定分组的并发症发生率为25.8%。同样,在主要并发症方面,独立亚组的发生率最低(1.4%),而OLIF L2-5伴后路稳定亚组(1.8%)和未指定OLIF L2-5亚组(1.6%)的发生率较高。然而,这些差异在统计学上并不显著。总之,OLIF术后主要并发症的发生率极低,是一种安全的手术,其优点远远大于风险。与独立的OLIF L2-5相比,后路稳定的OLIF L2-5的优势是一个值得讨论的话题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound-Assisted Removal of a Wooden Foreign Body Embedded in the Neck Complications Associated with Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) for Lumbar Hemivertebra in an Adult Using Three-Dimensional-Printed Patient-Specific Implants and Virtual Surgery Planning: A Technical Report Intraoperative Complications of the Anterior Retroperitoneal Approach to the Lumbosacral Spine in the Supine Position: A Proposal for an Algorithm to Predict the Degree of Difficulty of the Surgical Procedure Robotic Liver Resection: Report of Institutional First 100 Cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1