Cartographic Approach of the Left Periphery

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Concentric-Studies in Linguistics Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.17002/sil..69.202310.133
Jeongmin Han
{"title":"Cartographic Approach of the Left Periphery","authors":"Jeongmin Han","doi":"10.17002/sil..69.202310.133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rizzi(1997: 297) suggests that the recursion of ForceP and FocP in the structure of the left periphery is banned. However, there are some structures that have double complementizers and subject-multiple auxiliaries inversion in embedded clauses. Gelderen(2004), Radford (2018), Nyvad(2016), and Jang(2014) present double complementizer structures such as that+if/whether/wh-word which one ForceP cannot accommodate. In addition, regarding FocP, Culicover & Winkler(2008) and Park(2012) suggest subject-multiple auxiliaries inversion in embedded than/nor clauses. In general, head movement of T to FocP accounts for the type that inverts single auxiliary, but is incompatible with the type of multiple auxiliaries inversion. Many theoretical proposals have difficulty in accounting for these structures. This paper proposes Split-ForceP and Split-FocP to solve these phenomena which existing theories cannot explain properly.","PeriodicalId":41887,"journal":{"name":"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics","volume":"39 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17002/sil..69.202310.133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rizzi(1997: 297) suggests that the recursion of ForceP and FocP in the structure of the left periphery is banned. However, there are some structures that have double complementizers and subject-multiple auxiliaries inversion in embedded clauses. Gelderen(2004), Radford (2018), Nyvad(2016), and Jang(2014) present double complementizer structures such as that+if/whether/wh-word which one ForceP cannot accommodate. In addition, regarding FocP, Culicover & Winkler(2008) and Park(2012) suggest subject-multiple auxiliaries inversion in embedded than/nor clauses. In general, head movement of T to FocP accounts for the type that inverts single auxiliary, but is incompatible with the type of multiple auxiliaries inversion. Many theoretical proposals have difficulty in accounting for these structures. This paper proposes Split-ForceP and Split-FocP to solve these phenomena which existing theories cannot explain properly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左边缘的制图方法
Rizzi(1997: 297)认为在左外周结构中禁止ForceP和FocP的递归。然而,在嵌入子句中,也存在双补语和主-多助语倒装的结构。Gelderen(2004), Radford (2018), Nyvad(2016)和Jang(2014)提出了双补语结构,例如+if/whether/wh-word,这是一个ForceP无法容纳的。此外,关于FocP, culicover&winkler(2008)和Park(2012)建议在嵌入的than/nor从句中使用主语-多助词倒转。一般情况下,T向fcp的头部运动属于单辅倒转型,但与多辅倒转型不相容。许多理论建议难以解释这些结构。为了解决这些现有理论无法很好解释的现象,本文提出了split - force和Split-FocP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Concentric-Studies in Linguistics
Concentric-Studies in Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Concentric: Studies in Linguistics is a refereed, biannual journal, publishing research articles on all aspects of linguistic studies on the languages in the Asia-Pacific region. Review articles and book reviews with solid argumentation are also considered. The journal is indexed in Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Modern Language Association (MLA) Directory of Periodicals, MLA International Bibliography, Linguistics & Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA), EBSCOhost, Communication & Mass Media Complete (CMMC), Airiti Library (AL), Taiwan Citation Index-Humanities and Social Sciences, and Taiwan Humanities Citation Index(THCI)-Level 1. First published in 1964 under the title,The Concentric, the journal aimed to promote academic research in the fields of linguistics and English literature, and to provide an avenue for researchers to share results of their investigations with other researchers and practitioners. Later in 1976, the journal was renamed as Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, and in 2001 was further renamed as Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics. As the quantity of research in the fields of theoretical linguistics, applied linguistics, and English literature has increased greatly in recent years, the journal has evolved into two publications. Beginning in 2004, these two journals have been published under the titles Concentric: Studies in Linguistics and Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies respectively.
期刊最新文献
On the general classifiers ge and zàg in Hakka Loanword adaptation of Japanese consonants in Kavalan Directional verb constructions in Mandarin A restructuring analysis of the non‑inferential evidential verb han in Siwkolan Amis Factors affecting voice onset time in English stops
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1