Gendered experiences during COVID-19 in Turkey and the meaning of home

Pınar Melis Yelsalı Parmaksız
{"title":"Gendered experiences during COVID-19 in Turkey and the meaning of home","authors":"Pınar Melis Yelsalı Parmaksız","doi":"10.1080/0966369x.2023.2272222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis work aims to uncover the changing meaning of home by focusing on gender-based experiences of staying at home during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey. The findings show that the meaning of home is not straightforward and, depending on one’s gender-based experiences and diverse experiences of staying at home arise. In this work, Doreen Massey’s (Citation1994) joint conceptualisations of spatiality and identity for understanding space and place in general and home in particular not as an absolute but as a relational place, together with Iris Marion Young’s (Citation2005) conceptualisation of homemaking provide the theoretical context for linking the stay-at-home experiences of the participants with the meaning of home during the COVID-19 pandemic from a gender perspective. Furthermore, gender-based experiences of staying at home during the COVID-19 in Turkey are meaningful in the context of the discourses and social policy interventions of the existing government producing the social organization of space from an anti-gender and a conservative neo-liberal perspective. This work is based on online qualitative semi-structured interviews conducted with 32 self-identified female participants. Interview data were interpreted using the three thematic categories of ‘home as a dwelling,’ ‘home as a burden,’ ‘home as a place for preservation. The findings support the existing research on the gender-specific organisation of care work and time usage and further contribute to the field by demonstrating that home was a gendered space sustained through mutual relations between gender practices and spatial practices before and during the pandemic.Keywords: Homehomemakinggenderpandemicwomen in Turkey AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by Bahçeşehir University through Grant BAP.2020-02.09.1. The author owes special thanks to the sociology students Zuhal Akay, Uğurcan Akkoca, İrem Aydost, Ceren Çiçekdiken, Kübra Nur Demir, Defne Tuzcuoğlu, and Mehtap Öncü for their collaboration in conducting and managing some of the interviews.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Note on contributorPınar Melis Yelsalı Parmaksız is a professor at Bahçeşehir University in the Department of Sociology. She received her PhD in Turkish Studies from Leiden University in 2009 with a thesis titled ‘Modernization and Gender Regimes in Turkey: Life Histories of the Wives of Turkish Political Leaders’. Her main areas of interest are gender and women’s studies, Turkish modernisation, memory studies, and methodology, including feminist methodology. Among her publications are books titled Ev Kitabı [Book of Home] (Nika Yay, forthcoming), Türkiye’nin Modernleşmesinde Kadınlar [Women in Turkish Modernisation] (İmge Yay., 2017), Mothers in Public and Political Life (Demeter Press, 2017), and Neye Yarar Hatıralar? Türkiye’de Bellek ve Siyaset Çalışmaları [What Are Memories For? Studies on Memory and Politics in Turkey] (Phoenix Yay., 2013) and many articles including ‘Cultural Memory of Social Protest: Mnemonic Literature about Gezi Park Protests’ (Memory Studies, 2020), ‘Thirty Years of Gender and Women’s Studies in Turkey’ (Women’s Studies International Forum, 2019), ‘Belleğin Mekânından Mekânın Belleğine Kavramsal Bir Tartışma’ (İlef, 2019), and ‘Paternalism, Modernization and Gender Regime in Turkey’ (Aspasia, 2016).Data availability statementData are available on request from the author.Additional informationFundingBahçeşehir Üniversitesi; Grant BAP.2020-02.09.1.","PeriodicalId":12513,"journal":{"name":"Gender, Place & Culture","volume":"6 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender, Place & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369x.2023.2272222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThis work aims to uncover the changing meaning of home by focusing on gender-based experiences of staying at home during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey. The findings show that the meaning of home is not straightforward and, depending on one’s gender-based experiences and diverse experiences of staying at home arise. In this work, Doreen Massey’s (Citation1994) joint conceptualisations of spatiality and identity for understanding space and place in general and home in particular not as an absolute but as a relational place, together with Iris Marion Young’s (Citation2005) conceptualisation of homemaking provide the theoretical context for linking the stay-at-home experiences of the participants with the meaning of home during the COVID-19 pandemic from a gender perspective. Furthermore, gender-based experiences of staying at home during the COVID-19 in Turkey are meaningful in the context of the discourses and social policy interventions of the existing government producing the social organization of space from an anti-gender and a conservative neo-liberal perspective. This work is based on online qualitative semi-structured interviews conducted with 32 self-identified female participants. Interview data were interpreted using the three thematic categories of ‘home as a dwelling,’ ‘home as a burden,’ ‘home as a place for preservation. The findings support the existing research on the gender-specific organisation of care work and time usage and further contribute to the field by demonstrating that home was a gendered space sustained through mutual relations between gender practices and spatial practices before and during the pandemic.Keywords: Homehomemakinggenderpandemicwomen in Turkey AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by Bahçeşehir University through Grant BAP.2020-02.09.1. The author owes special thanks to the sociology students Zuhal Akay, Uğurcan Akkoca, İrem Aydost, Ceren Çiçekdiken, Kübra Nur Demir, Defne Tuzcuoğlu, and Mehtap Öncü for their collaboration in conducting and managing some of the interviews.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Note on contributorPınar Melis Yelsalı Parmaksız is a professor at Bahçeşehir University in the Department of Sociology. She received her PhD in Turkish Studies from Leiden University in 2009 with a thesis titled ‘Modernization and Gender Regimes in Turkey: Life Histories of the Wives of Turkish Political Leaders’. Her main areas of interest are gender and women’s studies, Turkish modernisation, memory studies, and methodology, including feminist methodology. Among her publications are books titled Ev Kitabı [Book of Home] (Nika Yay, forthcoming), Türkiye’nin Modernleşmesinde Kadınlar [Women in Turkish Modernisation] (İmge Yay., 2017), Mothers in Public and Political Life (Demeter Press, 2017), and Neye Yarar Hatıralar? Türkiye’de Bellek ve Siyaset Çalışmaları [What Are Memories For? Studies on Memory and Politics in Turkey] (Phoenix Yay., 2013) and many articles including ‘Cultural Memory of Social Protest: Mnemonic Literature about Gezi Park Protests’ (Memory Studies, 2020), ‘Thirty Years of Gender and Women’s Studies in Turkey’ (Women’s Studies International Forum, 2019), ‘Belleğin Mekânından Mekânın Belleğine Kavramsal Bir Tartışma’ (İlef, 2019), and ‘Paternalism, Modernization and Gender Regime in Turkey’ (Aspasia, 2016).Data availability statementData are available on request from the author.Additional informationFundingBahçeşehir Üniversitesi; Grant BAP.2020-02.09.1.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病期间土耳其的性别经历与家的意义
摘要本研究旨在通过关注2019冠状病毒病大流行期间土耳其基于性别的居家经历,揭示家的意义变化。研究结果表明,家的意义并不是直截了当的,而且根据一个人基于性别的经历和不同的在家经历而出现。在这项工作中,Doreen Massey (Citation1994)对空间和身份的联合概念化,以理解一般的空间和地点,特别是家不是绝对的,而是一个关系的地方,与Iris Marion Young (Citation2005)对家政的概念化一起,为从性别角度将COVID-19大流行期间参与者的居家经历与家的意义联系起来提供了理论背景。此外,在土耳其新冠疫情期间,基于性别的居家经历在现政府的话语和社会政策干预背景下具有重要意义,现政府从反性别和保守的新自由主义角度产生了社会空间组织。这项工作是基于对32名自我认同的女性参与者进行的在线定性半结构化访谈。访谈数据用“家作为住所”、“家作为负担”、“家作为保存场所”这三个主题类别来解释。调查结果支持了针对性别的护理工作组织和时间使用的现有研究,并进一步促进了这一领域,因为它表明,在大流行之前和期间,家庭是一个性别空间,通过性别实践和空间实践之间的相互关系得以维持。关键词:土耳其家庭妇女性别流行病学致谢本工作由bahe大学通过Grant BAP.2020-02.09.1资助。作者特别感谢社会学学生Zuhal Akay, Uğurcan Akkoca, İrem Aydost, Ceren Çiçekdiken, k bra Nur Demir, Defne Tuzcuoğlu和Mehtap Öncü,他们合作进行和管理了一些采访。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。关于contributorPınar的说明Melis yelsalyi Parmaksız是bahe大学社会学系的教授。她于2009年获得莱顿大学土耳其研究博士学位,论文题为“土耳其的现代化和性别制度:土耳其政治领导人妻子的生活史”。她的主要研究领域是性别和妇女研究、土耳其现代化、记忆研究和方法论,包括女权主义方法论。她的著作包括《家之书》(Nika Yay,即将出版)、《 rkiye 'nin modernle mesinde Kadınlar》(İmge Yay)。, 2017),公共和政治生活中的母亲(Demeter Press, 2017), Neye Yarar Hatıralar?t rkiye 'de Bellek ve Siyaset Çalışmaları[回忆是为了什么?土耳其的记忆与政治研究[凤凰雅]。, 2013)和许多文章,包括“社会抗议的文化记忆:关于Gezi公园抗议的记忆文学”(记忆研究,2020),“土耳其性别和妇女研究三十年”(妇女研究国际论坛,2019),“Belleğin Mekânından Mekânın Belleğine Kavramsal Bir Tartışma”(İlef, 2019)和“家长制,现代化和土耳其性别制度”(Aspasia, 2016)。数据可用性声明数据可根据作者的要求提供。其他信息:fundingbahe ehir Üniversitesi;格兰特BAP.2020-02.09.1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Closedness and openness in Tehran; a feminist critique of Sennett Gendering the BRI: a viewpoint The gendered body during Covid-19: views from Australia, the United Kingdom, and Japan - Introduction to themed section (Re)making live-in or live-out choice: the lived experience of Filipina migrant domestic workers in Macao Gendered experiences during COVID-19 in Turkey and the meaning of home
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1