A STUDY OF JOHN WANSBROUGH THOUGHTS ON QUR’ANIC STUDIES

Azwar Sani
{"title":"A STUDY OF JOHN WANSBROUGH THOUGHTS ON QUR’ANIC STUDIES","authors":"Azwar Sani","doi":"10.20871/tjsq.v6i1.304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of Islam, particularly Quranic studies, has been shaped by various methodologies and interpretations introduced by Western scholars. Among them, John Wansbrough’s provocative insights in his methodological approach stand out. Wansbrough’s historical and literary analysis challenges traditional views by proposing that the Quran is a product of cultural evolution and influence. This article delves into Wansbrough’s perspective, focusing on his work ‘The Quranic Studies: Sources and Methods of Scriptural Interpretation.’ This study reveals Wansbrough’s arguments about the possibility of Jewish-Christian traditions in the Quran, the role of cultural contexts, and the evolution of the Quranic text. Wansbrough’s methods, including historical scepticism and literary analysis, have triggered both support and criticism. Wansbrough suggests that sacred texts, such as the Quran, may consist of different layers and undergo changes and revisions over time, especially due to cultural, political, and social influences. Although some scholars view Wansbrough’s methods as too sceptical and controversial, others consider them to provide valuable insights into the history and development of sacred texts. Scholars such as Fazlur Rahman have criticized Wansbrough’s theories, defending traditional views. However, supporters argue that Wansbrough’s ideas expand the boundaries of Quranic studies. Ultimately, this article explores and demonstrates open and critical discussions within the realm of Islamic studies, acknowledging various perspectives to achieve a deeper understanding of the complex origins and interpretations of the Quran. This research uses a qualitative approach and literature analysis to understand John Wansbrough’s thinking. Open and critical discussions are necessary for Islamic studies to understand the various perspectives and methods in uncovering the meaning of the Quran and the history of Islam.","PeriodicalId":53103,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Studi AlQuran","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Studi AlQuran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20871/tjsq.v6i1.304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study of Islam, particularly Quranic studies, has been shaped by various methodologies and interpretations introduced by Western scholars. Among them, John Wansbrough’s provocative insights in his methodological approach stand out. Wansbrough’s historical and literary analysis challenges traditional views by proposing that the Quran is a product of cultural evolution and influence. This article delves into Wansbrough’s perspective, focusing on his work ‘The Quranic Studies: Sources and Methods of Scriptural Interpretation.’ This study reveals Wansbrough’s arguments about the possibility of Jewish-Christian traditions in the Quran, the role of cultural contexts, and the evolution of the Quranic text. Wansbrough’s methods, including historical scepticism and literary analysis, have triggered both support and criticism. Wansbrough suggests that sacred texts, such as the Quran, may consist of different layers and undergo changes and revisions over time, especially due to cultural, political, and social influences. Although some scholars view Wansbrough’s methods as too sceptical and controversial, others consider them to provide valuable insights into the history and development of sacred texts. Scholars such as Fazlur Rahman have criticized Wansbrough’s theories, defending traditional views. However, supporters argue that Wansbrough’s ideas expand the boundaries of Quranic studies. Ultimately, this article explores and demonstrates open and critical discussions within the realm of Islamic studies, acknowledging various perspectives to achieve a deeper understanding of the complex origins and interpretations of the Quran. This research uses a qualitative approach and literature analysis to understand John Wansbrough’s thinking. Open and critical discussions are necessary for Islamic studies to understand the various perspectives and methods in uncovering the meaning of the Quran and the history of Islam.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
约翰·万斯布罗夫古兰经研究思想研究
伊斯兰教的研究,特别是古兰经的研究,受到西方学者引入的各种方法和解释的影响。其中,约翰·万斯布罗(John Wansbrough)在方法论上的挑衅性见解尤为突出。Wansbrough的历史和文学分析挑战了传统观点,提出古兰经是文化演变和影响的产物。本文将深入探讨万斯布罗的观点,重点关注他的著作《古兰经研究:圣经解释的来源和方法》。这项研究揭示了Wansbrough关于《古兰经》中犹太教和基督教传统的可能性、文化背景的作用以及《古兰经》文本的演变的论点。万斯布罗的方法,包括历史怀疑主义和文学分析,引发了支持和批评。Wansbrough认为,像《古兰经》这样的神圣文本可能由不同的层次组成,并随着时间的推移而发生变化和修订,尤其是由于文化、政治和社会的影响。尽管一些学者认为万斯布罗的方法过于怀疑和有争议,但其他人认为他们为神圣文本的历史和发展提供了有价值的见解。Fazlur Rahman等学者批评了Wansbrough的理论,为传统观点辩护。然而,支持者认为,万斯布罗的想法扩大了古兰经研究的边界。最后,本文探索并展示了伊斯兰研究领域内开放和批判性的讨论,承认各种观点,以更深入地理解古兰经的复杂起源和解释。本研究采用定性研究和文献分析相结合的方法来理解约翰·万斯布罗夫的思想。开放和批判性的讨论对于伊斯兰研究理解揭示古兰经的意义和伊斯兰历史的各种观点和方法是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
INTERPRETATION ULUMUL QUR’AN COURSE AS THE FOUNDATION FOR MODERATE UNDERSTANDING OF FEBI IAIN PONTIANAK STUDENTS, WEST KALIMANTAN PROVINCE THE MEANING OF KHALAQA IN THE QUR’AN A STUDY OF JOHN WANSBROUGH THOUGHTS ON QUR’ANIC STUDIES TRANSCENDENT PRINCIPLES OF MA‘ĀD IN THE QUR`AN RECONSTRUCTION OF THE MEANING OF WIFE BEATING LICENSE IN THE QUR’AN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1