Sound insulation in multi-family houses: Proposal of single number limits for acoustical protection and comfort

IF 1.4 Q3 ACOUSTICS BUILDING ACOUSTICS Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI:10.1177/1351010x231206077
Fredrik Ljunggren, Christian Simmons
{"title":"Sound insulation in multi-family houses: Proposal of single number limits for acoustical protection and comfort","authors":"Fredrik Ljunggren, Christian Simmons","doi":"10.1177/1351010x231206077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the acoustical quality in apartment housing is studied. The purpose is to find out to what extent occupants are annoyed by indoor noise and to compare the annoyance with measured airborne and impact sound insulation. The occupants in 38 building cases in Sweden, grouped into different construction categories, were asked in a questionnaire to rate their annoyance for a variety of potentially disturbing sound sources. In total, 1230 individual responses were used for the statistical analyses. The result shows that on average, the occupants are quite satisfied and reported low annoyance. This is taken as an indication that the present National legislation for sound insulation, airborne sound insulation included, works well. However, annoyance from footstep of walking neighbours is an exception, causing significantly greater annoyance compared to any other source, especially among occupants in lightweight buildings. The commonly used impact sound insulation descriptors are unable to match subjective experience. In combination with the sensitivity of lightweight floors to low-frequency sounds, improper building designs are likely to result in poor noise protection for the occupants. To overcome this issue, a new single number quantity taking frequencies as low as 25 Hz into account is suggested.","PeriodicalId":51841,"journal":{"name":"BUILDING ACOUSTICS","volume":"54 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BUILDING ACOUSTICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1351010x231206077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, the acoustical quality in apartment housing is studied. The purpose is to find out to what extent occupants are annoyed by indoor noise and to compare the annoyance with measured airborne and impact sound insulation. The occupants in 38 building cases in Sweden, grouped into different construction categories, were asked in a questionnaire to rate their annoyance for a variety of potentially disturbing sound sources. In total, 1230 individual responses were used for the statistical analyses. The result shows that on average, the occupants are quite satisfied and reported low annoyance. This is taken as an indication that the present National legislation for sound insulation, airborne sound insulation included, works well. However, annoyance from footstep of walking neighbours is an exception, causing significantly greater annoyance compared to any other source, especially among occupants in lightweight buildings. The commonly used impact sound insulation descriptors are unable to match subjective experience. In combination with the sensitivity of lightweight floors to low-frequency sounds, improper building designs are likely to result in poor noise protection for the occupants. To overcome this issue, a new single number quantity taking frequencies as low as 25 Hz into account is suggested.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多户住宅的隔声:声学保护和舒适性的单一数字限制的建议
本文对公寓房屋的声学质量进行了研究。目的是找出居住者对室内噪声的厌烦程度,并将其与测量的空气和冲击隔声进行比较。瑞典38个建筑案例的居住者被分为不同的建筑类别,他们被要求填写一份问卷,评估他们对各种潜在干扰声源的烦恼程度。总共有1230份个人回复被用于统计分析。结果表明,平均而言,居住者非常满意,并且报告的烦恼很少。这表明,目前的国家隔声立法,包括空中隔声,效果良好。然而,来自步行邻居的脚步声的烦恼是一个例外,与任何其他来源相比,它造成的烦恼要大得多,尤其是在轻型建筑的居住者中。常用的冲击隔声描述词无法与主观经验相匹配。再加上轻质地板对低频声音的敏感性,不适当的建筑设计很可能会导致使用者的噪音防护效果不佳。为了克服这个问题,建议考虑频率低至25 Hz的新单数字量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BUILDING ACOUSTICS
BUILDING ACOUSTICS ACOUSTICS-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Enhancing response estimation and system identification in structural health monitoring through data-driven approaches Effect of loudspeaker position and model on cognitive load, quality, clarity, and sentence recognition performance Determination of the sound absorption coefficient of ETFE cushions in-situ using the genetic material optimizer in Odeon® Methodological approaches and main factors considered in school soundscape studies: A scoping review The relationship between the in situ flanking sound reduction index and the laboratory measured flanking normalized level difference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1