Methodological approaches and main factors considered in school soundscape studies: A scoping review

IF 1.4 Q3 ACOUSTICS BUILDING ACOUSTICS Pub Date : 2023-11-29 DOI:10.1177/1351010x231216016
Hatice Kubra Kurukose Cal, Jian Kang, F. Aletta
{"title":"Methodological approaches and main factors considered in school soundscape studies: A scoping review","authors":"Hatice Kubra Kurukose Cal, Jian Kang, F. Aletta","doi":"10.1177/1351010x231216016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"School acoustics is pivotal for children’s well-being given their substantial time commitment to education within these environments, with potential positive or negative impacts. Soundscape has gained relevance in various settings, including indoor environments, and explores both positive and negative responses of individuals to sounds within a context. This scoping review aims to investigate the application of the soundscape approach within the school environment, with a primary focus on evaluating perceptions of the acoustic environment. It aims to identify key factors considered in the studies, such as age groups, sound sources, and methodologies. A Scopus search was conducted, covering the period from January 2000 to September 2023. The search was limited to peer-reviewed articles published in English. The inclusion criteria required studies to investigate schools and assess the perceptions. After screening, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria from 49 articles. The most targeted age cohort was primary school-aged children. Yet, the need to consider secondary school children’s perceptions persists. The dominant sounds investigated were categorized as “negative” sounds, referring to auditory stimuli that are commonly perceived as unpleasant. These negative sounds were primarily traffic-induced noise. The prevailing method used was questionnaires. To advance school soundscape research, exploring secondary school-aged children’s views would provide valuable insights. By enhancing knowledge in this field, researchers can improve school acoustics for student well-being. Notably, a limitation of this review is that soundscape studies have centered around urban environments so far. Consequently, there have been only a limited number of studies examining indoor environments, and even less for schools.","PeriodicalId":51841,"journal":{"name":"BUILDING ACOUSTICS","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BUILDING ACOUSTICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1351010x231216016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

School acoustics is pivotal for children’s well-being given their substantial time commitment to education within these environments, with potential positive or negative impacts. Soundscape has gained relevance in various settings, including indoor environments, and explores both positive and negative responses of individuals to sounds within a context. This scoping review aims to investigate the application of the soundscape approach within the school environment, with a primary focus on evaluating perceptions of the acoustic environment. It aims to identify key factors considered in the studies, such as age groups, sound sources, and methodologies. A Scopus search was conducted, covering the period from January 2000 to September 2023. The search was limited to peer-reviewed articles published in English. The inclusion criteria required studies to investigate schools and assess the perceptions. After screening, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria from 49 articles. The most targeted age cohort was primary school-aged children. Yet, the need to consider secondary school children’s perceptions persists. The dominant sounds investigated were categorized as “negative” sounds, referring to auditory stimuli that are commonly perceived as unpleasant. These negative sounds were primarily traffic-induced noise. The prevailing method used was questionnaires. To advance school soundscape research, exploring secondary school-aged children’s views would provide valuable insights. By enhancing knowledge in this field, researchers can improve school acoustics for student well-being. Notably, a limitation of this review is that soundscape studies have centered around urban environments so far. Consequently, there have been only a limited number of studies examining indoor environments, and even less for schools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学校声景研究的方法和考虑的主要因素:范围审查
学校声学对儿童的身心健康至关重要,因为他们需要在这些环境中投入大量时间接受教育,这可能会产生积极或消极的影响。声景在包括室内环境在内的各种环境中都具有相关性,并探讨了个人在某一环境中对声音的积极和消极反应。本范围审查旨在调查声景方法在学校环境中的应用,主要重点是评估对声学环境的看法。它旨在确定研究中考虑的关键因素,如年龄组、声源和方法。对 2000 年 1 月至 2023 年 9 月期间的研究进行了 Scopus 搜索。搜索仅限于以英语发表的经同行评审的文章。纳入标准要求研究对学校进行调查并评估认知情况。经过筛选,49 篇文章中有 11 项研究符合纳入标准。最有针对性的年龄组是小学学龄儿童。然而,仍有必要考虑中学生的看法。调查的主要声音被归类为 "负面 "声音,指通常被认为是不愉快的听觉刺激。这些负面声音主要是由交通引起的噪音。采用的主要方法是问卷调查。为了推进学校声景研究,探索中学生的观点将提供宝贵的见解。通过加强这一领域的知识,研究人员可以改善学校声学,促进学生的身心健康。值得注意的是,本综述的局限性在于,迄今为止,声景研究主要集中在城市环境中。因此,对室内环境的研究数量有限,对学校的研究就更少了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BUILDING ACOUSTICS
BUILDING ACOUSTICS ACOUSTICS-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Enhancing response estimation and system identification in structural health monitoring through data-driven approaches Effect of loudspeaker position and model on cognitive load, quality, clarity, and sentence recognition performance Determination of the sound absorption coefficient of ETFE cushions in-situ using the genetic material optimizer in Odeon® Methodological approaches and main factors considered in school soundscape studies: A scoping review The relationship between the in situ flanking sound reduction index and the laboratory measured flanking normalized level difference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1