Story-listening as methodology: a feminist case for unheard stories

Arielle Frenette
{"title":"Story-listening as methodology: a feminist case for unheard stories","authors":"Arielle Frenette","doi":"10.1080/0966369x.2023.2272225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn light of the ongoing practice of non-Indigenous researchers conducting studies on Indigenous lands, new opportunities are needed for creative alternatives to fieldwork, along with an honest conversation about ethics, intent, and practices of place-based collaborative methods in Indigenous studies. In this paper, I explore the notion of story-listening as a creative methodological alternative to extractive methods for settler scholars in Indigenous communities. Through personal reflection, I argue that decolonizing research strategies should involve practices which minimize settler presence in, and demands on, Indigenous communities. A storied approach to research points to academic expectations of knowledge-production, which contribute to silencing Indigenous voices, while paradoxically setting Settler researchers as a privileged audience of Indigenous stories. Looking for told-but-unheard stories, I argue, is one way to find answers and guidance in research while respecting storytellers’ agency and challenging colonial origin stories. Methodological ideas for unheard stories are explored in three phases: hearing, listening, and sharing. All stages of story-listening involve care and respect for the storyteller.Keywords: Anti-colonialfeminist standpoint theoryIndigenous researchmethodologystorytelling AcknowledgementsI am grateful to Astrid Johanne Nyland for her helpful comments on the first version of this paper. I also want to thank Caroline Desbiens, Julia Christensen, and Eleanor Stephenson for their support, feedback, and revisions.Disclosure statementThe author reports there are no competing interests to declare.Funding detailsThis work is supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.Additional informationNotes on contributorsArielle FrenetteArielle Frenette is a PhD candidate in geography at Université Laval in Québec City, Canada. Her work focuses on neo-colonial imaginaries surrounding climate change, environmental conservation and animal rights in the Arctic, as well as counter-discourses to these narratives. Her research interests include the intersections between critical northern geography, media studies and feminist methodologies, as well as questions regarding Indigenous rights and self-determination.","PeriodicalId":12513,"journal":{"name":"Gender, Place & Culture","volume":"35 28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender, Place & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369x.2023.2272225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractIn light of the ongoing practice of non-Indigenous researchers conducting studies on Indigenous lands, new opportunities are needed for creative alternatives to fieldwork, along with an honest conversation about ethics, intent, and practices of place-based collaborative methods in Indigenous studies. In this paper, I explore the notion of story-listening as a creative methodological alternative to extractive methods for settler scholars in Indigenous communities. Through personal reflection, I argue that decolonizing research strategies should involve practices which minimize settler presence in, and demands on, Indigenous communities. A storied approach to research points to academic expectations of knowledge-production, which contribute to silencing Indigenous voices, while paradoxically setting Settler researchers as a privileged audience of Indigenous stories. Looking for told-but-unheard stories, I argue, is one way to find answers and guidance in research while respecting storytellers’ agency and challenging colonial origin stories. Methodological ideas for unheard stories are explored in three phases: hearing, listening, and sharing. All stages of story-listening involve care and respect for the storyteller.Keywords: Anti-colonialfeminist standpoint theoryIndigenous researchmethodologystorytelling AcknowledgementsI am grateful to Astrid Johanne Nyland for her helpful comments on the first version of this paper. I also want to thank Caroline Desbiens, Julia Christensen, and Eleanor Stephenson for their support, feedback, and revisions.Disclosure statementThe author reports there are no competing interests to declare.Funding detailsThis work is supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.Additional informationNotes on contributorsArielle FrenetteArielle Frenette is a PhD candidate in geography at Université Laval in Québec City, Canada. Her work focuses on neo-colonial imaginaries surrounding climate change, environmental conservation and animal rights in the Arctic, as well as counter-discourses to these narratives. Her research interests include the intersections between critical northern geography, media studies and feminist methodologies, as well as questions regarding Indigenous rights and self-determination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为方法论的故事倾听:闻所未闻的故事的女权主义案例
鉴于非土著研究人员在土著土地上进行研究的持续实践,需要新的机会来创造性地替代实地考察,以及关于土著研究中基于地点的合作方法的伦理、意图和实践的诚实对话。在本文中,我探讨了故事倾听的概念,作为土著社区定居者学者提取方法的创造性方法论替代方案。通过个人反思,我认为非殖民化研究策略应该包括尽量减少定居者在土著社区的存在和对土著社区的要求的实践。故事化的研究方法指向知识生产的学术期望,这有助于压制土著的声音,同时矛盾地将定居者研究人员作为土著故事的特权听众。我认为,寻找被讲述但闻所未闻的故事,是在尊重故事讲述者的代理和挑战殖民起源故事的同时,在研究中找到答案和指导的一种方式。对闻所未闻的故事的方法论思想分为三个阶段:听、听和分享。听故事的所有阶段都包括关心和尊重讲故事的人。关键词:反殖民主义女权主义立场理论土著研究方法讲故事致谢感谢Astrid Johanne Nyland对本文第一版的指导性意见。我还要感谢Caroline Desbiens、Julia Christensen和Eleanor Stephenson的支持、反馈和修改。披露声明作者报告无竞争利益需要申报。本研究由加拿大社会科学与人文研究理事会资助。作者简介:arielle Frenette是加拿大quemail市拉瓦尔大学地理学博士研究生。她的作品主要关注围绕气候变化、环境保护和北极动物权利的新殖民主义想象,以及对这些叙事的反话语。她的研究兴趣包括批判性北方地理学、媒体研究和女权主义方法论之间的交叉,以及有关土著权利和自决的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Closedness and openness in Tehran; a feminist critique of Sennett Gendering the BRI: a viewpoint The gendered body during Covid-19: views from Australia, the United Kingdom, and Japan - Introduction to themed section (Re)making live-in or live-out choice: the lived experience of Filipina migrant domestic workers in Macao Gendered experiences during COVID-19 in Turkey and the meaning of home
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1