Hots Manifestation in English Summative Assessment

Rachmawati Achadiyah, None Muhammad Ulul Azmi
{"title":"Hots Manifestation in English Summative Assessment","authors":"Rachmawati Achadiyah, None Muhammad Ulul Azmi","doi":"10.29407/jetar.v8i2.20915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Higher-order thinking gains a positive role in language assessment since it is compulsory to be implemented in the teaching-learning and evaluation system of the latest curriculum. The implementation of HOTS in English tests assists students in practicing their analytical, critical, and problem-solving skills in real life. It is essential to know how the hots question is narrated in English summative assessment. Myriad research has examined the thinking level applied in English summative tests. However, there has been less previous evidence for portraying how the hots questions were being narrated. This study specifically employed a case study as a research design with content analysis as the technique to analyze the data. Three papers of the English summative test of the first, second, and third grades of junior high school became the source of the data. The result highlighted that the ninth-grade English summative test applied higher-order thinking in 72% of both multiple choice and essay. The thinking levels used are giving a solution, giving a recommendation, giving an opinion, making judgments, and interpreting. This study discovered how English teachers also, as the test designers, formulate hots questions in English summative tests.","PeriodicalId":53044,"journal":{"name":"Getsempena English Education Journal","volume":"169 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Getsempena English Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v8i2.20915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Higher-order thinking gains a positive role in language assessment since it is compulsory to be implemented in the teaching-learning and evaluation system of the latest curriculum. The implementation of HOTS in English tests assists students in practicing their analytical, critical, and problem-solving skills in real life. It is essential to know how the hots question is narrated in English summative assessment. Myriad research has examined the thinking level applied in English summative tests. However, there has been less previous evidence for portraying how the hots questions were being narrated. This study specifically employed a case study as a research design with content analysis as the technique to analyze the data. Three papers of the English summative test of the first, second, and third grades of junior high school became the source of the data. The result highlighted that the ninth-grade English summative test applied higher-order thinking in 72% of both multiple choice and essay. The thinking levels used are giving a solution, giving a recommendation, giving an opinion, making judgments, and interpreting. This study discovered how English teachers also, as the test designers, formulate hots questions in English summative tests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英语总结性评价中的热点表现
高阶思维在新课程的教与评体系中被强制实施,在语言评价中发挥了积极的作用。在英语测试中实施HOTS有助于学生在现实生活中练习分析、批判和解决问题的技能。在英语总结性评价中,如何叙述热点问题是至关重要的。大量研究考察了英语总结性测试中思维水平的应用。然而,关于这些热点问题是如何被叙述的,之前的证据较少。本研究特别采用个案研究作为研究设计,并以内容分析作为分析资料的技术。初中一、二、三年级英语总结性测试的三篇论文成为数据的来源。结果显示,在九年级英语总结性测试中,72%的学生在多项选择题和写作题中运用了高阶思维。所使用的思维层次包括给出解决方案、给出建议、给出意见、做出判断和解释。本研究揭示了英语教师作为考试设计者如何在英语总结性考试中提出热点问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hots Manifestation in English Summative Assessment the Max Pzoras’ Character Development in Karan Bajaj’s the Yoga of Max’s Discontent EFL Students' Language Learning Strategies at Argumentative Writing Class at UNIROW Tuban An Analysis of the Violation of Maxims in “Just Friends” Webtoon by CL Nuna Psychological distance in language learning: a case study in higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1