Post-war economic recovery policy: experience of the Republic of Korea

Victoria Nebrat
{"title":"Post-war economic recovery policy: experience of the Republic of Korea","authors":"Victoria Nebrat","doi":"10.15407/econforecast2022.04.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of a strategy for post-war recovery of Ukraine's economy determines the advisability and importance of taking into account international experience. An urgent task is to assess the possibility to implement those economic policy tools that have proven their practical effectiveness. At the same time, it is necessary to define the reservations and risks associated with the implementation of certain aspects in the recovery policy. The purpose of the article is to identify institutional factors and economic mechanisms that provided the successful post-war recovery and development of the Republic of Korea in the 1960s and 1970s. Revealing the positive experience of the restructuring involves the account of historical conditions, and the role of foreign aid and internal sources of economic growth. The author has used the methods of comparative and problem-logical analysis, the institutional-evolutionary approach, the principle of integrability as a basis for the synthesis of empirical and theoretical knowledge, and the methodological approach of F. List regarding the historical conditioning of forms of economic nationalism. It is established that after the end of the Korean War, in 1953–1960, domestic policy and foreign aid were focused on solving the primary tasks of overcoming devastation and hunger. The author considers the forms of interaction between the state, the business environment and foreign aid in ensuring the recovery and development of the economy of the Republic of Korea in the 1960s and 1970s. Contrary to the recommendations aimed at liberalizing the economy with a focus on the development of traditional industries, the government of Park Chung-hee gradually implemented a national strategy aimed at industrialization and achieving global competitiveness on high-tech markets. This was facilitated by the introduction of the national planning system, the financial strategy of public-private partnership, and the support for export-oriented industrial production. The agrarian reform, focused on the development of highly productive family farming, contributed to the consolidation of food self-sufficiency and expansion of the domestic market. The strict policy of the redistribution of donor funds by the state provided a so-called export discipline for big business, thanks to which the national corporations - chaebols - became the drivers of investment and innovation based modernization of the economy. The author defines the main components of the Republic of Korea's success in realizing the national interests of economic development under the conditions of foreign aid in post-war reconstruction. An assessment is made of the possibility and expediency of using South Korean experience in Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":500930,"journal":{"name":"Economy and forecasting","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economy and forecasting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/econforecast2022.04.035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of a strategy for post-war recovery of Ukraine's economy determines the advisability and importance of taking into account international experience. An urgent task is to assess the possibility to implement those economic policy tools that have proven their practical effectiveness. At the same time, it is necessary to define the reservations and risks associated with the implementation of certain aspects in the recovery policy. The purpose of the article is to identify institutional factors and economic mechanisms that provided the successful post-war recovery and development of the Republic of Korea in the 1960s and 1970s. Revealing the positive experience of the restructuring involves the account of historical conditions, and the role of foreign aid and internal sources of economic growth. The author has used the methods of comparative and problem-logical analysis, the institutional-evolutionary approach, the principle of integrability as a basis for the synthesis of empirical and theoretical knowledge, and the methodological approach of F. List regarding the historical conditioning of forms of economic nationalism. It is established that after the end of the Korean War, in 1953–1960, domestic policy and foreign aid were focused on solving the primary tasks of overcoming devastation and hunger. The author considers the forms of interaction between the state, the business environment and foreign aid in ensuring the recovery and development of the economy of the Republic of Korea in the 1960s and 1970s. Contrary to the recommendations aimed at liberalizing the economy with a focus on the development of traditional industries, the government of Park Chung-hee gradually implemented a national strategy aimed at industrialization and achieving global competitiveness on high-tech markets. This was facilitated by the introduction of the national planning system, the financial strategy of public-private partnership, and the support for export-oriented industrial production. The agrarian reform, focused on the development of highly productive family farming, contributed to the consolidation of food self-sufficiency and expansion of the domestic market. The strict policy of the redistribution of donor funds by the state provided a so-called export discipline for big business, thanks to which the national corporations - chaebols - became the drivers of investment and innovation based modernization of the economy. The author defines the main components of the Republic of Korea's success in realizing the national interests of economic development under the conditions of foreign aid in post-war reconstruction. An assessment is made of the possibility and expediency of using South Korean experience in Ukraine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
战后经济复苏政策:大韩民国的经验
制定乌克兰战后经济复苏战略决定了考虑国际经验的可取性和重要性。一项紧迫的任务是评估实施那些已证明其实际有效性的经济政策工具的可能性。同时,有必要定义与恢复策略中某些方面的实现相关的保留和风险。这篇文章的目的是找出体制因素和经济机制,这些因素和经济机制在1960年代和1970年代为大韩民国战后的成功复苏和发展提供了条件。揭示改革的积极经验涉及对历史条件的描述,以及外援和经济增长的内部来源的作用。作者运用了比较分析和问题逻辑分析的方法、制度演化方法、作为经验和理论知识综合基础的可整合性原则,以及F. List关于经济民族主义形式的历史条件的方法论方法。可以确定的是,1953年至1960年朝鲜战争结束后,国内政策和对外援助的重点是解决克服破坏和饥饿的主要任务。作者考虑了国家、商业环境和外援之间相互作用的形式,以确保大韩民国在20世纪60年代和70年代的经济复苏和发展。与以发展传统产业为中心的经济自由化的建议相反,朴正熙政府逐步实施了以工业化和在高科技市场上获得全球竞争力为目标的国家战略。实行国家规划制度、公私伙伴关系的财政战略和支持面向出口的工业生产,促进了这一点。以发展生产力很高的家庭农业为重点的土地改革有助于巩固粮食自给自足和扩大国内市场。由国家重新分配捐赠资金的严格政策,为大企业提供了所谓的出口纪律,因此,国有企业——财阀——成为以投资和创新为基础的经济现代化的驱动力。作者界定了大韩民国在战后重建的外援条件下成功实现经济发展的国家利益的主要组成部分。对在乌克兰问题上运用韩国经验的可能性和妥当性进行了评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An assessment of Ukraine’s financial security: sectoral breakdown and general level Post-war economic recovery policy: experience of the Republic of Korea Factors of monetary and credit policy: world and Ukraine in the conditions of military aggression Inter-status mobility in Ukraine’s labor market The state in the post-war industrial recovery and economic renewal: historical parallels and approaches for Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1