Government Funding of Charities Serving Indigenous Peoples

Rose Anne Devlin, Michela Planatscher
{"title":"Government Funding of Charities Serving Indigenous Peoples","authors":"Rose Anne Devlin, Michela Planatscher","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2023.71.3.devlin","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are several reasons why governments fund charities. Relative to government ministries, charities are often better able to assess and adapt to local needs, serve vulnerable populations, and deliver culturally sensitive services where appropriate. This article investigates the funding decisions of governments by focusing on charities that provide services to Indigenous individuals. The authors use Canada Revenue Agency T3010 data on registered charities from 2003 to 2017 to extract information on charities that serve the Indigenous population and further separate this group into those located off and on reserves. Governments fund Indigenous-serving charities differently than their non-Indigenous counterparts. Being an Indigenous-serving charity is associated with a 25 percent increase in the predicted probability of receiving government support relative to non-Indigenous charities (for the reference group). Indigenous-serving charities on reserve are 17 percent <i>less likely</i> to receive public funding relative to those off reserve. Federal government funding seems to act as a catalyst for provincial and municipal funding. The authors' results lend support to the idea that governments fund charities to provide locally appropriate services to vulnerable populations.","PeriodicalId":474883,"journal":{"name":"Canadian tax journal","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian tax journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2023.71.3.devlin","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are several reasons why governments fund charities. Relative to government ministries, charities are often better able to assess and adapt to local needs, serve vulnerable populations, and deliver culturally sensitive services where appropriate. This article investigates the funding decisions of governments by focusing on charities that provide services to Indigenous individuals. The authors use Canada Revenue Agency T3010 data on registered charities from 2003 to 2017 to extract information on charities that serve the Indigenous population and further separate this group into those located off and on reserves. Governments fund Indigenous-serving charities differently than their non-Indigenous counterparts. Being an Indigenous-serving charity is associated with a 25 percent increase in the predicted probability of receiving government support relative to non-Indigenous charities (for the reference group). Indigenous-serving charities on reserve are 17 percent less likely to receive public funding relative to those off reserve. Federal government funding seems to act as a catalyst for provincial and municipal funding. The authors' results lend support to the idea that governments fund charities to provide locally appropriate services to vulnerable populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政府资助为土著人民服务的慈善机构
政府资助慈善机构有几个原因。与政府部门相比,慈善机构往往能够更好地评估和适应当地需求,为弱势群体服务,并在适当的时候提供文化敏感的服务。本文通过关注为土著居民提供服务的慈善机构来调查政府的资助决策。作者使用了加拿大税务局2003年至2017年注册慈善机构的T3010数据,提取了为土著居民服务的慈善机构的信息,并进一步将这一群体分为保留地和保留地。政府资助土著服务慈善机构的方式与资助非土著服务慈善机构的方式不同。作为一个为土著服务的慈善机构,与非土著慈善机构相比,获得政府支持的预测概率增加了25%(对于参考组)。在保留地为土著服务的慈善机构是17% <i>不太可能</i>相对于那些非保护区获得公共资助。联邦政府的资金似乎是省、市资金的催化剂。作者的研究结果支持了政府资助慈善机构为弱势群体提供适合当地的服务的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Policy Forum : Comment se matérialise l'exercice de l'autonomie fiscale du Québec? Correspondence: Pillar 2 and the BITs Planification fiscale personnelle : Les nouvelles règles relatives à l'IMR — Est-ce que l'impôt minimum de remplacement est un tigre de papier avec de nouveaux crocs? Government Funding of Charities Serving Indigenous Peoples Corporate Tax Planning: The Refashioning of Earnouts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1