Barriers to end-of-life decisions and care objectives in intensive care units

Ahmet Sari, Osman Ekinci
{"title":"Barriers to end-of-life decisions and care objectives in intensive care units","authors":"Ahmet Sari, Osman Ekinci","doi":"10.51271/kmj-0111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Technological advancements have played a crucial role in the advanced development of organ support systems in intensive care units (ICUs). While the utilization of support systems enhances patient discharge rates, it also extends the ICU stay of patients with terminal comorbidities who have no chance of survival. This elongation of the dying process, which is the inevitable outcome, results in a suspension of life in a sense. Hence, the effective implementation of end-of-life decisions and care stands as one of the crucial steps in the intensive care process. The objective of this study is to identify barriers to end-of-life decision-making and care in intensive care settings. Its aim is to facilitate a comprehensive, suitable, and peaceful experience for patients at the end of life and their families by making the necessary arrangements. Methods: This survey study involved physicians and nurses evaluating the prepared questionnaire questions concerning the challenges encountered in intensive care settings. Results: The most important barriers to making end-of-life decisions in intensive care were; among clinician-related factors, concern about legal liability for withholding life-sustaining treatments was 98 (79.7%), among institutional and ICU-related factors, the lack of regulated protocols and standards for end-of-life decisions and care was 96 (78%), among family-related factors, unrealistic expectations of patients and/or families about the prognosis or effectiveness of ICU treatment was 83 (67.5%), and disagreements among family members about end-of-life decisions was 80 (65%).Regarding end-of-life care, the admission of patients to the intensive care unit who would not benefit from treatments in the intensive care unit was rated as 110 (89.4%) and the absence of palliative care services to which a dying patient could be transferred was rated as 108 (87.8%). Conclusion: Providing unavailing treatments to patients who will not benefit from intensive care interventions results in a decline in quality of life, increased distress among family members, and burnout among intensive care staff. Therefore, end-of-life decisions and care should be effectively implemented in intensive care units. Ensuring adequate training, fostering effective communication between clinicians and families, and maximizing collaboration and communication with the ICU team and other medical departments can facilitate prompt and effective decision-making regarding end-of-life care.","PeriodicalId":369732,"journal":{"name":"Kastamonu Medical Journal","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kastamonu Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51271/kmj-0111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Technological advancements have played a crucial role in the advanced development of organ support systems in intensive care units (ICUs). While the utilization of support systems enhances patient discharge rates, it also extends the ICU stay of patients with terminal comorbidities who have no chance of survival. This elongation of the dying process, which is the inevitable outcome, results in a suspension of life in a sense. Hence, the effective implementation of end-of-life decisions and care stands as one of the crucial steps in the intensive care process. The objective of this study is to identify barriers to end-of-life decision-making and care in intensive care settings. Its aim is to facilitate a comprehensive, suitable, and peaceful experience for patients at the end of life and their families by making the necessary arrangements. Methods: This survey study involved physicians and nurses evaluating the prepared questionnaire questions concerning the challenges encountered in intensive care settings. Results: The most important barriers to making end-of-life decisions in intensive care were; among clinician-related factors, concern about legal liability for withholding life-sustaining treatments was 98 (79.7%), among institutional and ICU-related factors, the lack of regulated protocols and standards for end-of-life decisions and care was 96 (78%), among family-related factors, unrealistic expectations of patients and/or families about the prognosis or effectiveness of ICU treatment was 83 (67.5%), and disagreements among family members about end-of-life decisions was 80 (65%).Regarding end-of-life care, the admission of patients to the intensive care unit who would not benefit from treatments in the intensive care unit was rated as 110 (89.4%) and the absence of palliative care services to which a dying patient could be transferred was rated as 108 (87.8%). Conclusion: Providing unavailing treatments to patients who will not benefit from intensive care interventions results in a decline in quality of life, increased distress among family members, and burnout among intensive care staff. Therefore, end-of-life decisions and care should be effectively implemented in intensive care units. Ensuring adequate training, fostering effective communication between clinicians and families, and maximizing collaboration and communication with the ICU team and other medical departments can facilitate prompt and effective decision-making regarding end-of-life care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临终决定和重症监护病房护理目标的障碍
目的:技术进步在重症监护病房(icu)器官支持系统的先进发展中发挥了至关重要的作用。支持系统的使用在提高患者出院率的同时,也延长了无生存机会的晚期合并症患者的ICU住院时间。这种死亡过程的延长是不可避免的结果,在某种意义上导致了生命的暂停。因此,有效地实施临终决定和护理是重症监护过程中的关键步骤之一。本研究的目的是确定在重症监护环境中临终决策和护理的障碍。其目的是通过作出必要的安排,为临终病人及其家属提供全面、合适和平静的体验。方法:本调查研究让医生和护士对准备的关于重症监护环境中遇到的挑战的问卷进行评估。结果:在重症监护中做出临终决定的最重要障碍是;在临床相关因素中,98人(79.7%)担心停止生命维持治疗的法律责任;在制度和ICU相关因素中,96人(78%)缺乏规范的临终决定和护理方案和标准;在家庭相关因素中,83人(67.5%)对患者和/或家属对ICU治疗的预后或有效性抱有不切实际的期望;在家庭成员中,80人(65%)对临终决定存在分歧。在临终关怀方面,无法从重症监护病房治疗中获益的患者入住重症监护病房的评分为110分(89.4%),而缺乏临终患者可以转到的姑息治疗服务的评分为108分(87.8%)。结论:对无法从重症监护干预中获益的患者进行无效治疗,会导致患者的生活质量下降,家属的痛苦增加,重症监护人员的倦怠。因此,临终决定和护理应在重症监护病房有效实施。确保充分的培训,促进临床医生和家属之间的有效沟通,并最大限度地与ICU团队和其他医疗部门合作和沟通,可以促进有关临终关怀的及时有效决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health follow-up visits of children with autism How much did the February 6 earthquakes affect a distant hospital? The effect of general anesthesia applied during cesarean section on newborn bilirubin Ultrasound-guided neuromonitoring methods in the intensive care unit Pulmonary candidiasis presenting as tumor-like shadow
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1