Illocutionary Indicators: A Comparative-Typological Perspective

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Nauchnyi Dialog Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI:10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-8-143-155
E. R. Ioanesyan
{"title":"Illocutionary Indicators: A Comparative-Typological Perspective","authors":"E. R. Ioanesyan","doi":"10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-8-143-155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is part of the research on speech acts. The object of description is illocutionary units. The relevance of the study is determined by the fact that illocutionary markers play a significant role in oral communication processes. The interest in the examined units is also determined by the fact that certain illocutionary constructions over time transform into metatextual indicators, discourse markers. The main meaning of illocutionary units is the expression of prohibition, prohibition and disapproval, prohibition and threat, disapproval, disagreement, disagreement and objection, refusal, agreement, demand for cessation of action, permission, threat, reproach, surprise, admiration. The aim of this article is to present the mechanisms of formation of non-descriptive use of linguistic units in illocutionary function. The models of formation of illocutionary idioms are identified. Classes of units capable of serving as illocutionary markers are distinguished. Special attention is paid to illocutionary expressions with propositional verbs. Illocutionary markers formed from verbs denoting physical actions, verbs denoting movement, and verbs denoting physical impact on an object are also presented. A comparative study of illocutionary markers in different languages — Russian, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Polish, English, Spanish, Italian, German, Portuguese — is conducted using a large number of examples from literary works. Linguistically specific formulas are presented.","PeriodicalId":43602,"journal":{"name":"Nauchnyi Dialog","volume":"23 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauchnyi Dialog","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-8-143-155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is part of the research on speech acts. The object of description is illocutionary units. The relevance of the study is determined by the fact that illocutionary markers play a significant role in oral communication processes. The interest in the examined units is also determined by the fact that certain illocutionary constructions over time transform into metatextual indicators, discourse markers. The main meaning of illocutionary units is the expression of prohibition, prohibition and disapproval, prohibition and threat, disapproval, disagreement, disagreement and objection, refusal, agreement, demand for cessation of action, permission, threat, reproach, surprise, admiration. The aim of this article is to present the mechanisms of formation of non-descriptive use of linguistic units in illocutionary function. The models of formation of illocutionary idioms are identified. Classes of units capable of serving as illocutionary markers are distinguished. Special attention is paid to illocutionary expressions with propositional verbs. Illocutionary markers formed from verbs denoting physical actions, verbs denoting movement, and verbs denoting physical impact on an object are also presented. A comparative study of illocutionary markers in different languages — Russian, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Polish, English, Spanish, Italian, German, Portuguese — is conducted using a large number of examples from literary works. Linguistically specific formulas are presented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
言外指示语:比较类型学的视角
本研究是言语行为研究的一部分。描述的对象是言外单位。本研究的相关性是由言外语标记物在口语交际过程中发挥重要作用这一事实决定的。对被检查单位的兴趣也取决于这样一个事实,即某些言外构造随着时间的推移转变为元语篇指示物,话语标记物。言外单位的主要含义是表达禁止、禁止和不赞成、禁止和威胁、不赞成、不同意、不同意和反对、拒绝、同意、要求停止行动、允许、威胁、责备、惊讶、钦佩。本文旨在探讨非描述性语言单位在言外功能中的形成机制。指出了言外习语的形成模式。能够作为言外语标记的单位类别被区分开来。特别注意的是与命题动词的言外表达。还介绍了由表示物理动作的动词、表示运动的动词和表示对物体的物理影响的动词组成的言外语标记。本文以大量文学作品为例,对俄语、白俄罗斯语、乌克兰语、波兰语、英语、西班牙语、意大利语、德语、葡萄牙语等不同语言的言外标记语进行了比较研究。给出了语言学上的具体公式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nauchnyi Dialog
Nauchnyi Dialog HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
215
期刊最新文献
Functional Potential of Multilingual Text in Urban Space: a Linguistic-Semiotic Perspective Royal Council of England in 1483 and Usurpation of Power by Richard III Reparations Withdrawals Of Metallurgical Equipment in Central and Eastern European Countries at Final Stage of Great Patriotic War (1944—1945) Vyatka Church Seals of Synodal Period: an Attempt at Classification (Collection of Sphragistics at P.V. Alabin Kirov Regional Local Lore Museum) Counterintelligence Activities of Gendarmerie Railway Police before and during World War I
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1