Ethiopia and Great Powers in Final Stage of Italo-Ethiopian War (March — May 1936)

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Nauchnyi Dialog Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI:10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-8-438-454
T. P. Nesterova
{"title":"Ethiopia and Great Powers in Final Stage of Italo-Ethiopian War (March — May 1936)","authors":"T. P. Nesterova","doi":"10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-8-438-454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the political situation that emerged in international relations after Germany’s remilitarization of the Rhineland on March 7, 1936, and the impact this event had on the development of the Italo-Ethiopian War in both political and military spheres. Published diplomatic documents from Italy, France, the Soviet Union, and the League of Nations are studied. It is argued that the introduction of German troops into the Rhineland significantly diminished the interest of major powers in the Italo-Ethiopian War and brought to the forefront their desire for “Italy’s return to Europe,” as both France and Britain were interested in involving Italy in countering Germany and protecting Austria’s independence. Based on the examined documents, it is concluded that France and Britain sought to resolve the conflict through concessions from Ethiopia, as a realistic approach to international relations led to the belief that Ethiopia could not achieve a military victory, especially after its attempt to strike at Italy’s armed forces resulted in defeat at the Battle of Maychew. The capture of Ethiopia’s capital Addis Ababa and the exile of Emperor Haile Selassie I effectively destroyed any prospects for a peaceful resolution of the conflict, despite Ethiopia’s attempts to act through the structures of the League of Nations.","PeriodicalId":43602,"journal":{"name":"Nauchnyi Dialog","volume":"33 16","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauchnyi Dialog","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-8-438-454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the political situation that emerged in international relations after Germany’s remilitarization of the Rhineland on March 7, 1936, and the impact this event had on the development of the Italo-Ethiopian War in both political and military spheres. Published diplomatic documents from Italy, France, the Soviet Union, and the League of Nations are studied. It is argued that the introduction of German troops into the Rhineland significantly diminished the interest of major powers in the Italo-Ethiopian War and brought to the forefront their desire for “Italy’s return to Europe,” as both France and Britain were interested in involving Italy in countering Germany and protecting Austria’s independence. Based on the examined documents, it is concluded that France and Britain sought to resolve the conflict through concessions from Ethiopia, as a realistic approach to international relations led to the belief that Ethiopia could not achieve a military victory, especially after its attempt to strike at Italy’s armed forces resulted in defeat at the Battle of Maychew. The capture of Ethiopia’s capital Addis Ababa and the exile of Emperor Haile Selassie I effectively destroyed any prospects for a peaceful resolution of the conflict, despite Ethiopia’s attempts to act through the structures of the League of Nations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衣索比亚战争末期的衣索比亚与列强(1936年3月至5月)
本文考察了1936年3月7日德国在莱茵兰重新军事化后国际关系中出现的政治局势,以及这一事件对意大利-埃塞俄比亚战争在政治和军事领域发展的影响。出版的外交文件从意大利,法国,苏联,以及国际联盟的研究。有人认为,德国军队进入莱茵兰大大削弱了大国在意大利-埃塞俄比亚战争中的利益,并将“意大利重返欧洲”的愿望放在了最重要的位置,因为法国和英国都对让意大利参与对抗德国和保护奥地利的独立感兴趣。根据审查的文件,得出的结论是,法国和英国试图通过埃塞俄比亚的让步来解决冲突,因为对国际关系的现实态度导致人们认为埃塞俄比亚不可能取得军事胜利,特别是在它试图打击意大利的武装部队导致在五月洲战役中失败之后。占领埃塞俄比亚首都亚的斯亚贝巴和流放海尔·塞拉西一世皇帝实际上摧毁了和平解决冲突的任何前景,尽管埃塞俄比亚试图通过国际联盟的结构采取行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nauchnyi Dialog
Nauchnyi Dialog HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
215
期刊最新文献
Functional Potential of Multilingual Text in Urban Space: a Linguistic-Semiotic Perspective Royal Council of England in 1483 and Usurpation of Power by Richard III Reparations Withdrawals Of Metallurgical Equipment in Central and Eastern European Countries at Final Stage of Great Patriotic War (1944—1945) Vyatka Church Seals of Synodal Period: an Attempt at Classification (Collection of Sphragistics at P.V. Alabin Kirov Regional Local Lore Museum) Counterintelligence Activities of Gendarmerie Railway Police before and during World War I
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1