Teachers’ Beliefs About Grading, Grades, and Student Classroom Conduct

Q4 Social Sciences Educational Practice & Theory Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.7459/ept/45.2.06
Peggy Chen, Sarah Bonner
{"title":"Teachers’ Beliefs About Grading, Grades, and Student Classroom Conduct","authors":"Peggy Chen, Sarah Bonner","doi":"10.7459/ept/45.2.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this mixed-methods study, inservice and preservice teachers ( n = 173) responded to a survey about using grading practices to address student classroom conduct, and 73 reflected further in writing. Many supported some use of grades to manage students, and those in favor tended toward more traditional beliefs about teaching, oriented around concerns for classroom management. Most participants who wrote reflectively identified conduct-based grading as aligned with behaviorist learning theory and without regard for its impact on grade interpretation. Educational implications suggest re-examining whether grades should be understood solely as representations of academic achievement or of multiple dimensions of schooling.","PeriodicalId":35223,"journal":{"name":"Educational Practice & Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Practice & Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7459/ept/45.2.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this mixed-methods study, inservice and preservice teachers ( n = 173) responded to a survey about using grading practices to address student classroom conduct, and 73 reflected further in writing. Many supported some use of grades to manage students, and those in favor tended toward more traditional beliefs about teaching, oriented around concerns for classroom management. Most participants who wrote reflectively identified conduct-based grading as aligned with behaviorist learning theory and without regard for its impact on grade interpretation. Educational implications suggest re-examining whether grades should be understood solely as representations of academic achievement or of multiple dimensions of schooling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师对评分、成绩和学生课堂行为的看法
在这项混合方法的研究中,在职教师和职前教师(n = 173)回应了一项关于使用评分实践来解决学生课堂行为的调查,73名教师以书面形式进一步反映。许多人支持使用分数来管理学生,而赞成者倾向于更传统的教学观念,以课堂管理为导向。大多数反思性写作的参与者认为,基于行为的评分与行为主义学习理论是一致的,而没有考虑到它对评分解释的影响。教育意义建议重新审视成绩是否应该仅仅被理解为学业成就的表征,还是学校教育的多个维度的表征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Practice & Theory
Educational Practice & Theory Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Educational Practice and Theory in its 40th year of publication continues as an important independent forum for original ideas in education research relevant to aspects of education including K-12 schools, education reforms, teaching methods and educational leadership. Educational Practice and Theory is: -a refereed journal with a distinguished panel of consulting editors; -comparative in focus; -innovative, path-finding and provocative; -diverse with reports on a wide range of countries and themes, and -applied and theoretical.
期刊最新文献
Teachers’ Beliefs About Grading, Grades, and Student Classroom Conduct Decision-Making Instruction: Rural Teachers’ Challenges and Perceptions of Robert Stahl’s Decision-Making Materials in the Social Studies Classroom Humor in Education: Exploring Its Complexities and Its Possibilities Notes and Comments Teachers as a Source of Support: Perceptions of Parents of Children With ADHD During COVID-19 Distance Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1