Survey of Pediatric Pharmacy Residency Program Directors and Former Residents on Post-Graduate Training Paths

Corinne N. Songer, Deborah S. Bondi, Lauren M. Oliveri, Jennie B. Jarrett, Kirsten H. Ohler
{"title":"Survey of Pediatric Pharmacy Residency Program Directors and Former Residents on Post-Graduate Training Paths","authors":"Corinne N. Songer, Deborah S. Bondi, Lauren M. Oliveri, Jennie B. Jarrett, Kirsten H. Ohler","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-28.6.530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective There are currently no data comparing outcomes of traditional vs pediatric-focused PGY1 residency programs. The primary objective of the survey was to identify if a difference in resident preparedness for a PGY2 pediatric pharmacy residency exists between these PGY1 program types. Methods This survey-based study included all PGY2 pediatric residency program directors (RPDs) in 2021 and PGY2 pediatric pharmacy residents who completed residency between 2016–2020. Information regarding training paths of residents, such as type of PGY1 completed, and preparedness at the start of a PGY2 pediatric residency was collected. Preparedness for both general and pediatric-specific elements were assessed. Results A total of 101 respondents were included: 36 RPDs and 65 previous residents. RPDs felt residents who completed a pediatric-focused PGY1 were more prepared in baseline knowledge of pediatric diseases; otherwise, residents were similar across residency types in their perceived preparation for a PGY2. Pediatric-focused PGY1 residents felt significantly more prepared in pediatric baseline knowledge (96% vs 75%, p = 0.002) and managing pediatric emergencies (96% vs 50%, p = 0.002) than those who completed a traditional PGY1 program. There was no difference for patient care or clinical research skills. Residents in both groups obtained pediatric pharmacist jobs and felt equally prepared for transitioning into their first post-residency job. Conclusions Despite a difference between the PGY1 resident groups in perceived baseline pediatric knowledge and preparedness to manage pediatric emergencies, similar post-residency jobs were obtained. Respondents felt equally prepared to begin their pediatric careers regardless of the type of PGY1 residency completed.","PeriodicalId":22794,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-28.6.530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective There are currently no data comparing outcomes of traditional vs pediatric-focused PGY1 residency programs. The primary objective of the survey was to identify if a difference in resident preparedness for a PGY2 pediatric pharmacy residency exists between these PGY1 program types. Methods This survey-based study included all PGY2 pediatric residency program directors (RPDs) in 2021 and PGY2 pediatric pharmacy residents who completed residency between 2016–2020. Information regarding training paths of residents, such as type of PGY1 completed, and preparedness at the start of a PGY2 pediatric residency was collected. Preparedness for both general and pediatric-specific elements were assessed. Results A total of 101 respondents were included: 36 RPDs and 65 previous residents. RPDs felt residents who completed a pediatric-focused PGY1 were more prepared in baseline knowledge of pediatric diseases; otherwise, residents were similar across residency types in their perceived preparation for a PGY2. Pediatric-focused PGY1 residents felt significantly more prepared in pediatric baseline knowledge (96% vs 75%, p = 0.002) and managing pediatric emergencies (96% vs 50%, p = 0.002) than those who completed a traditional PGY1 program. There was no difference for patient care or clinical research skills. Residents in both groups obtained pediatric pharmacist jobs and felt equally prepared for transitioning into their first post-residency job. Conclusions Despite a difference between the PGY1 resident groups in perceived baseline pediatric knowledge and preparedness to manage pediatric emergencies, similar post-residency jobs were obtained. Respondents felt equally prepared to begin their pediatric careers regardless of the type of PGY1 residency completed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科药学住院医师项目主任和前住院医师研究生培训路径调查
目前还没有比较传统PGY1住院医师项目和儿科PGY1住院医师项目结果的数据。调查的主要目的是确定这些PGY1项目类型之间是否存在PGY2儿科药房住院医师准备方面的差异。方法本研究以调查为基础,研究对象为所有2021年PGY2儿科住院医师项目主任(rpd)和2016-2020年完成住院的PGY2儿科药房住院医师。收集有关住院医师培训路径的信息,如PGY1完成的类型,以及PGY2儿科住院医师开始时的准备情况。对一般因素和儿科因素的准备情况进行了评估。结果共纳入101名调查对象,其中包括36名RPDs和65名原居民。rpd认为完成了以儿科为重点的PGY1的住院医生对儿科疾病的基线知识有更多的准备;此外,不同居住类型的居民对PGY2的感知准备是相似的。与完成传统PGY1项目的住院医生相比,以儿科为重点的PGY1住院医生在儿科基线知识(96%对75%,p = 0.002)和儿科急诊管理(96%对50%,p = 0.002)方面的准备明显更多。在病人护理或临床研究技能方面没有差异。两组的住院医生都获得了儿科药剂师的工作,并为过渡到他们的第一份住院后工作做好了同样的准备。结论:尽管PGY1住院医师组在认知基础儿科知识和应对儿科急诊的准备方面存在差异,但住院后的工作相似。无论完成PGY1住院医师的类型如何,受访者都同样准备好开始他们的儿科职业生涯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Acquisition and Chronic Infection at a Single Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis Care Center The Precompetitive Space for Drug or Vaccine Development: What Does It Look Like Now and What Could It Look Like in the Future? Ethanol Lock for Prevention of CVC-Related Bloodstream Infection in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Effect of Phytonadione on Correction of Coagulopathy in Pediatric Patients With Septic Shock Comparison of Outcomes in Neonates Receiving Cefepime or Ceftazidime
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1