You are lying! How misinformation accusations spread on Twitter

IF 5.9 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Internet Research Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI:10.1108/intr-07-2022-0572
Ashish S. Galande, Frank Mathmann, Cesar Ariza-Rojas, Benno Torgler, Janina Garbas
{"title":"You are lying! How misinformation accusations spread on Twitter","authors":"Ashish S. Galande, Frank Mathmann, Cesar Ariza-Rojas, Benno Torgler, Janina Garbas","doi":"10.1108/intr-07-2022-0572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Misinformation is notoriously difficult to combat. Although social media firms have focused on combating the publication of misinformation, misinformation accusations, an important by-product of the spread of misinformation, have been neglected. The authors offer insights into factors contributing to the spread of misinformation accusations on social media platforms. Design/methodology/approach The authors use a corpus of 234,556 tweets about the 2020 US presidential election (Study 1) and 99,032 tweets about the 2022 US midterm elections (Study 2) to show how the sharing of misinformation accusations is explained by locomotion orientation. Findings The study findings indicate that the sharing of misinformation accusations is explained by writers' lower locomotion orientation, which is amplified among liberal tweet writers. Research limitations/implications Practitioners and policymakers can use the study findings to track and reduce the spread of misinformation accusations by developing algorithms to analyze the language of posts. A limitation of this research is that it focuses on political misinformation accusations. Future research in different contexts, such as vaccines, would be pertinent. Practical implications The authors show how social media firms can identify messages containing misinformation accusations with the potential to become viral by considering the tweet writer's locomotion language and geographical data. Social implications Early identification of messages containing misinformation accusations can help to improve the quality of the political conversation and electoral decision-making. Originality/value Strategies used by social media platforms to identify misinformation lack scale and perform poorly, making it important for social media platforms to manage misinformation accusations in an effort to retain trust. The authors identify linguistic and geographical factors that drive misinformation accusation retweets.","PeriodicalId":54925,"journal":{"name":"Internet Research","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-07-2022-0572","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Misinformation is notoriously difficult to combat. Although social media firms have focused on combating the publication of misinformation, misinformation accusations, an important by-product of the spread of misinformation, have been neglected. The authors offer insights into factors contributing to the spread of misinformation accusations on social media platforms. Design/methodology/approach The authors use a corpus of 234,556 tweets about the 2020 US presidential election (Study 1) and 99,032 tweets about the 2022 US midterm elections (Study 2) to show how the sharing of misinformation accusations is explained by locomotion orientation. Findings The study findings indicate that the sharing of misinformation accusations is explained by writers' lower locomotion orientation, which is amplified among liberal tweet writers. Research limitations/implications Practitioners and policymakers can use the study findings to track and reduce the spread of misinformation accusations by developing algorithms to analyze the language of posts. A limitation of this research is that it focuses on political misinformation accusations. Future research in different contexts, such as vaccines, would be pertinent. Practical implications The authors show how social media firms can identify messages containing misinformation accusations with the potential to become viral by considering the tweet writer's locomotion language and geographical data. Social implications Early identification of messages containing misinformation accusations can help to improve the quality of the political conversation and electoral decision-making. Originality/value Strategies used by social media platforms to identify misinformation lack scale and perform poorly, making it important for social media platforms to manage misinformation accusations in an effort to retain trust. The authors identify linguistic and geographical factors that drive misinformation accusation retweets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你在撒谎!虚假信息指控是如何在Twitter上传播的
众所周知,错误信息是很难对付的。尽管社交媒体公司一直致力于打击错误信息的发布,但错误信息传播的一个重要副产品——错误信息指控却被忽视了。作者对导致虚假信息指控在社交媒体平台上传播的因素提出了见解。设计/方法/方法作者使用关于2020年美国总统选举的234,556条推文(研究1)和关于2022年美国中期选举的99,032条推文(研究2)的语料库来展示如何通过运动方向来解释错误信息指控的共享。研究发现,作者较低的运动倾向解释了错误信息指控的分享,这种倾向在自由主义推文作者中被放大。从业人员和政策制定者可以通过开发算法来分析帖子的语言,利用研究结果来跟踪和减少错误信息指控的传播。这项研究的一个局限性是它关注的是政治错误信息指控。未来在不同背景下的研究,如疫苗,将是相关的。作者展示了社交媒体公司如何通过考虑推文作者的移动语言和地理数据来识别包含错误信息指控的信息,这些信息有可能成为病毒式传播。早期识别包含错误信息指控的信息有助于提高政治对话和选举决策的质量。社交媒体平台用于识别错误信息的独创性/价值策略缺乏规模且表现不佳,因此社交媒体平台管理错误信息指控以保持信任非常重要。作者确定了推动错误信息指控转发的语言和地理因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internet Research
Internet Research 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.20%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This wide-ranging interdisciplinary journal looks at the social, ethical, economic and political implications of the internet. Recent issues have focused on online and mobile gaming, the sharing economy, and the dark side of social media.
期刊最新文献
Can digital transformation alleviate corporate fraud? Evidence from China Gameful systems for corporate sustainability: systematic review, conceptual framework and research agenda on gamification and sustainable employee behavior in companies Why do people customize avatars in the metaverse? Curiosity and SOR model perspective “I am sorry for judging you”: conceptualizing sentiment reversal among followers in case of falsely alleged social media influencer transgression Unveiling factors and contingencies influencing exhaustion in professional esports players: evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1