Anti-racism in the Public Service of Canada: How can critical race theory inform research and practice in Canadian public administration?

IF 1.1 4区 管理学 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada Pub Date : 2023-10-29 DOI:10.1111/capa.12542
Maria Gintova
{"title":"Anti-racism in the Public Service of Canada: How can critical race theory inform research and practice in Canadian public administration?","authors":"Maria Gintova","doi":"10.1111/capa.12542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 2020, the issue of racism in Canada moved to the forefront of public attention as systemic racial inequities were revealed and exacerbated by the pandemic and prominent deaths of Black individuals at the hands of the police in the United States and Canada. In Canada, much attention was focused on continued harm caused by existing policies and institutions to diverse populations (Cameron &amp; Tedds, <span>2023</span>). Thus, the conversation on racism in Canadian society, coupled with the exposure of societal inequities, intensified the scrutiny of systemic challenges and barriers faced by racialized Canadians in government and private sector workplaces, in particular public policies and public administration practices.</p><p>For example, Sostero et al. (<span>2020</span>) show that high paid white-collar workers were the main beneficiaries of remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic. Indeed, the pandemic disproportionately affected racialized communities because racialized workers are less likely to be in remote-friendly jobs (Samuel &amp; Robertson, <span>2021</span>). Governments as employers are no exception. In the federal Public Service of Canada (PSC), Indigenous and Black public servants are over-represented in lower-paying positions (TBS, <span>2023</span>), and many of them continued going into office during the pandemic. Together with the existing issues in hiring and promotion and a lack of diversity in the public service executive positions, highlighted in the <i>Call to Action on Anti-racism, Equity, and Inclusion in the Federal Public Service</i> (Government of Canada, <span>2021</span>), the impact of the pandemic on Indigenous, Black, and other racialized public servants in the federal government is yet to be fully understood.</p><p>As anti-racism initiatives across governments in Canada are further developed and implemented, it is important to consider a different approach to tackling racism in the PSC. This includes anti-racist considerations in decision-making as well as proactively engaging with Indigenous, Black, and other racialized public servants on potential solutions that are sensitive to their experience. For example, the most recent transformation initiative in the PSC—the transition to hybrid work—may further exacerbate inequities in access to flexible work arrangements by Indigenous, Black, and other racialized public servants, especially by those with intersecting identities, unless an anti-racism lens is applied.</p><p>What follows presents anti-racism initiatives and considerations in the PSC to demonstrate the value of applying critical race theory (CRT) in Canadian public administration. It starts with an overview of CRT as a framework and then provides a brief summary of the existing anti-racism initiatives in the Government of Canada. Finally, an emerging anti-racism research agenda is set out more generally for the field of Canadian public administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":46145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada","volume":"66 4","pages":"574-580"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/capa.12542","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/capa.12542","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2020, the issue of racism in Canada moved to the forefront of public attention as systemic racial inequities were revealed and exacerbated by the pandemic and prominent deaths of Black individuals at the hands of the police in the United States and Canada. In Canada, much attention was focused on continued harm caused by existing policies and institutions to diverse populations (Cameron & Tedds, 2023). Thus, the conversation on racism in Canadian society, coupled with the exposure of societal inequities, intensified the scrutiny of systemic challenges and barriers faced by racialized Canadians in government and private sector workplaces, in particular public policies and public administration practices.

For example, Sostero et al. (2020) show that high paid white-collar workers were the main beneficiaries of remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic. Indeed, the pandemic disproportionately affected racialized communities because racialized workers are less likely to be in remote-friendly jobs (Samuel & Robertson, 2021). Governments as employers are no exception. In the federal Public Service of Canada (PSC), Indigenous and Black public servants are over-represented in lower-paying positions (TBS, 2023), and many of them continued going into office during the pandemic. Together with the existing issues in hiring and promotion and a lack of diversity in the public service executive positions, highlighted in the Call to Action on Anti-racism, Equity, and Inclusion in the Federal Public Service (Government of Canada, 2021), the impact of the pandemic on Indigenous, Black, and other racialized public servants in the federal government is yet to be fully understood.

As anti-racism initiatives across governments in Canada are further developed and implemented, it is important to consider a different approach to tackling racism in the PSC. This includes anti-racist considerations in decision-making as well as proactively engaging with Indigenous, Black, and other racialized public servants on potential solutions that are sensitive to their experience. For example, the most recent transformation initiative in the PSC—the transition to hybrid work—may further exacerbate inequities in access to flexible work arrangements by Indigenous, Black, and other racialized public servants, especially by those with intersecting identities, unless an anti-racism lens is applied.

What follows presents anti-racism initiatives and considerations in the PSC to demonstrate the value of applying critical race theory (CRT) in Canadian public administration. It starts with an overview of CRT as a framework and then provides a brief summary of the existing anti-racism initiatives in the Government of Canada. Finally, an emerging anti-racism research agenda is set out more generally for the field of Canadian public administration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大公共服务部门的反种族主义:批判性种族理论如何为加拿大公共行政的研究和实践提供信息?
2020 年,加拿大的种族主义问题成为公众关注的焦点,因为系统性的种族不平等被揭露出来,并因美国和加拿大黑人死于警察之手的大流行和突出事件而加剧。在加拿大,人们的注意力主要集中在现有政策和机构对不同人群造成的持续伤害上(Cameron & Tedds, 2023)。例如,Sostero 等人(2020 年)的研究表明,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,高薪白领是远程工作的主要受益者。事实上,大流行对种族化社区的影响尤为严重,因为种族化工人不太可能从事有利于远程工作的工作(Samuel & Robertson, 2021)。作为雇主的政府也不例外。在加拿大联邦公务员系统(PSC)中,土著和黑人公务员在低薪职位中所占比例过高(TBS,2023 年),其中许多人在大流行病期间继续任职。随着《联邦公务员反种族主义、公平和包容行动呼吁》(加拿大政府,2021 年)中强调的招聘和晋升方面的现有问题以及公共服务行政职位缺乏多样性的问题,大流行病对联邦政府中土著、黑人和其他种族化公务员的影响还有待充分了解。这包括在决策过程中考虑反种族主义因素,以及积极主动地与土著、黑人和其他种族化公务员接触,探讨适合他们经历的潜在解决方案。例如,公共服务委员会最近的转型举措--向混合工作制过渡--可能会进一步加剧土著人、黑人和其他种族化公务员,尤其是具有交叉身份的公务员在获得灵活工作安排方面的不平等,除非采用反种族主义视角。报告首先概述了批判性种族理论的框架,然后简要介绍了加拿大政府现有的反种族主义举措。最后,为加拿大公共行政领域提出了一个新的反种族主义研究议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Canadian Public Administration/Administration publique du Canada is the refereed scholarly publication of the Institute of Public Administration of Canada (IPAC). It covers executive, legislative, judicial and quasi-judicial functions at all three levels of Canadian government. Published quarterly, the journal focuses mainly on Canadian issues but also welcomes manuscripts which compare Canadian public sector institutions and practices with those in other countries or examine issues in other countries or international organizations which are of interest to the public administration community in Canada.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Canada Water Act, 1970: Did Parliamentarians Seek Cooperative Federalism? Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Challenges for Public Administration Breaking All the Rules: Information Technology Procurement in the Government of Canada Moving On, But Where? A Snapshot of Ontario Ministerial Staff Career Trajectories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1