Online focus groups as a tool to study policy professionals

Joost Berkhout, Michele Crepaz, Marcel Hanegraaff, Wiebke Marie Junk
{"title":"Online focus groups as a tool to study policy professionals","authors":"Joost Berkhout, Michele Crepaz, Marcel Hanegraaff, Wiebke Marie Junk","doi":"10.1177/20531680231211398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars interested in political elites and policy professionals only sporadically rely on focus group methods. In this article, we argue why this is a missed opportunity. Based on our own recent research experience, we suggest three innovations to the focus group method that should make it appealing for political scientists who study professionals active in the policy process. First, focus groups allow for the study of the interactions between political elites in ways other methods cannot. Second, the method can be used for hypothesis testing when focus groups are designed accordingly. Third, the option to conduct focus groups online has major advantages in terms of participant costs, ease of recruitment, and, potentially, research equity. We hope that our suggestions are useful for researchers wanting to build on any one—or all—of these innovations.","PeriodicalId":21062,"journal":{"name":"Research & Politics","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680231211398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholars interested in political elites and policy professionals only sporadically rely on focus group methods. In this article, we argue why this is a missed opportunity. Based on our own recent research experience, we suggest three innovations to the focus group method that should make it appealing for political scientists who study professionals active in the policy process. First, focus groups allow for the study of the interactions between political elites in ways other methods cannot. Second, the method can be used for hypothesis testing when focus groups are designed accordingly. Third, the option to conduct focus groups online has major advantages in terms of participant costs, ease of recruitment, and, potentially, research equity. We hope that our suggestions are useful for researchers wanting to build on any one—or all—of these innovations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线焦点小组作为研究政策专业人士的工具
对政治精英和政策专业人士感兴趣的学者只是偶尔依赖焦点小组方法。在本文中,我们将讨论为什么这是一个错失的机会。根据我们自己最近的研究经验,我们建议对焦点小组方法进行三个创新,这些创新应该会吸引那些研究活跃在政策过程中的专业人士的政治科学家。首先,焦点小组可以研究政治精英之间的互动,这是其他方法无法做到的。其次,该方法可以在设计相应的焦点小组时用于假设检验。第三,在线进行焦点小组的选择在参与者成本、招募便利性和潜在的研究公平性方面具有重大优势。我们希望我们的建议对想要建立其中任何一个或所有这些创新的研究人员有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Legitimate questions: Public perceptions of the legitimacy of US presidential election outcomes Replicating the effects of Facebook deactivation in an ethnically polarized setting Machine-learning applications to authoritarian selections: The case of China Understanding public attitudes toward restrictive voting laws in the United States Online focus groups as a tool to study policy professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1