Understanding Principles of Environmental Racism, Climate Change, and the Blob: A Socioecological Approach in the Development of Food Justice

IF 1.7 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1089/env.2021.0114
August John Hoffman
{"title":"Understanding Principles of Environmental Racism, Climate Change, and the Blob: A Socioecological Approach in the Development of Food Justice","authors":"August John Hoffman","doi":"10.1089/env.2021.0114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This mixed-methods quasiexperimental study examined the role of community psychology in relation to increasing problems of climate change, environmental racism, sustainable food production programs, and ecojustice. Green space and environmentally sustainable programs are increasingly popular examples of community service activities that can provide multiple ecologically sustainable benefits, including protecting limited natural resources and reducing carbon emissions and also facilitate community empowerment among vulnerable and Persons of Color and Indigenous groups. A significant (r = 0.869, p < 0.01) correlation was determined between engagement in green community service work (CSW) activities (i.e., a community fruit tree planting project among the Indigenous people of the Lower Sioux Tribal Nation), perceptions of community empowerment, and likelihood of participating in future CSW activities. Results of the study may be particularly appropriate for community organizers, educators, and stakeholders who are engaged and committed in the development of environmentally sustainable programs. In addition, the results of this study are both useful and viable in that they provide mechanisms to improve community health and empowerment in the development of sustainable community gardens and fruit tree orchards. Suggestions for future areas of study (including the development of community vegetable gardens, native prairie plants, and fruit tree orchards) are offered.","PeriodicalId":46143,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2021.0114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This mixed-methods quasiexperimental study examined the role of community psychology in relation to increasing problems of climate change, environmental racism, sustainable food production programs, and ecojustice. Green space and environmentally sustainable programs are increasingly popular examples of community service activities that can provide multiple ecologically sustainable benefits, including protecting limited natural resources and reducing carbon emissions and also facilitate community empowerment among vulnerable and Persons of Color and Indigenous groups. A significant (r = 0.869, p < 0.01) correlation was determined between engagement in green community service work (CSW) activities (i.e., a community fruit tree planting project among the Indigenous people of the Lower Sioux Tribal Nation), perceptions of community empowerment, and likelihood of participating in future CSW activities. Results of the study may be particularly appropriate for community organizers, educators, and stakeholders who are engaged and committed in the development of environmentally sustainable programs. In addition, the results of this study are both useful and viable in that they provide mechanisms to improve community health and empowerment in the development of sustainable community gardens and fruit tree orchards. Suggestions for future areas of study (including the development of community vegetable gardens, native prairie plants, and fruit tree orchards) are offered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解环境种族主义、气候变化和斑点的原则:食品正义发展中的社会生态学方法
这项混合方法的准实验研究考察了社区心理学在气候变化、环境种族主义、可持续粮食生产计划和生态正义等日益严重的问题中的作用。绿色空间和环境可持续项目是社区服务活动中越来越受欢迎的例子,它们可以提供多种生态可持续效益,包括保护有限的自然资源和减少碳排放,还可以促进弱势群体、有色人种和土著群体的社区赋权。参与绿色社区服务工作(CSW)活动(即下苏族部落国家土著居民的社区果树种植项目)、社区赋权的感知和参与未来CSW活动的可能性之间存在显著(r = 0.869, p < 0.01)的相关性。这项研究的结果可能特别适用于社区组织者、教育工作者和致力于环境可持续发展项目的利益相关者。此外,这项研究的结果既有用又可行,因为它们提供了改善社区健康的机制,并在可持续社区花园和果园的发展中赋予权力。对未来的研究领域(包括发展社区菜园、原生草原植物和果树果园)提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Justice
Environmental Justice ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Environmental Justice, a quarterly peer-reviewed journal, is the central forum for the research, debate, and discussion of the equitable treatment and involvement of all people, especially minority and low-income populations, with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. The Journal explores the adverse and disparate environmental burden impacting marginalized populations and communities all over the world. Environmental Justice draws upon the expertise and perspectives of all parties involved in environmental justice struggles: communities, industry, academia, government, and nonprofit organizations.
期刊最新文献
Empowering Citizens Through the Development and Deployment of a Community-Based Environmental Health Reporting Tool Electronic Monitoring Policy at Sea Beyond “Human Bycatch” The Lack of Real-Time Air Pollution Monitoring in Africa Supports Environmental Injustice What a Difference a Datum Makes: Revisiting the Impacts of Cap-and-Trade on Emissions and Environmental Justice Mixed Methods Approaches: Structures and Methodologies for Cumulative Impact Assessment Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1