The spatial nexus of monuments, memorability and identity formation in Chatsworth and Durban Central, South Africa

IF 2 Q2 GEOGRAPHY GEOJOURNAL Pub Date : 2023-09-09 DOI:10.1007/s10708-023-10934-2
Tariro Mukwidigwi, Maheshvari Naidu, Subashini Govender, Garikai Membele
{"title":"The spatial nexus of monuments, memorability and identity formation in Chatsworth and Durban Central, South Africa","authors":"Tariro Mukwidigwi, Maheshvari Naidu, Subashini Govender, Garikai Membele","doi":"10.1007/s10708-023-10934-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The monumentalization of public space has received significant scholarly attention both globally and locally. In the South African context, this interest has been further heightened by the #Rhodes Must Fall campaign in 2015, which raised questions about the relevance of colonial statues in the post-transformation era. This campaign sparked extensive debates regarding monumentalization within the country’s cultural landscape. Against this backdrop, the present empirical study aims to contribute to these discussions by examining the role of monuments, particularly their spatial characteristics, in shaping processes of memory and identity reconstruction within urban public spaces. The study employed cultural mapping techniques, including participatory GIS (PGIS) and semi-structured interviews, to generate data in the areas of Chatsworth and Durban Central. Additionally, the study draws upon Henri Lefebvre’s (1974) conceptualizations of monuments and Proshansky’s (1983) place-identity theory to explore the constitutive relationship between the spatiality of monuments and embodied memories in the production of spatial identities. The empirical findings of the study affirm monuments as sites for negotiating spatial identities, acknowledging the diversity and multiplicity of memories and identities that emerged. Furthermore, the study highlights the significance of the spatial context of monuments, including dimensions such as aesthetic appeal, geographic prominence, positionality, and discernibility, in influencing the symbolic value of monuments in memory-making and identity formation processes. In conclusion, the paper emphasizes the importance of reconfiguring the spatial context of monuments to ensure their efficacy in processes of memorialization and identity reconstruction.","PeriodicalId":51384,"journal":{"name":"GEOJOURNAL","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GEOJOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-023-10934-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The monumentalization of public space has received significant scholarly attention both globally and locally. In the South African context, this interest has been further heightened by the #Rhodes Must Fall campaign in 2015, which raised questions about the relevance of colonial statues in the post-transformation era. This campaign sparked extensive debates regarding monumentalization within the country’s cultural landscape. Against this backdrop, the present empirical study aims to contribute to these discussions by examining the role of monuments, particularly their spatial characteristics, in shaping processes of memory and identity reconstruction within urban public spaces. The study employed cultural mapping techniques, including participatory GIS (PGIS) and semi-structured interviews, to generate data in the areas of Chatsworth and Durban Central. Additionally, the study draws upon Henri Lefebvre’s (1974) conceptualizations of monuments and Proshansky’s (1983) place-identity theory to explore the constitutive relationship between the spatiality of monuments and embodied memories in the production of spatial identities. The empirical findings of the study affirm monuments as sites for negotiating spatial identities, acknowledging the diversity and multiplicity of memories and identities that emerged. Furthermore, the study highlights the significance of the spatial context of monuments, including dimensions such as aesthetic appeal, geographic prominence, positionality, and discernibility, in influencing the symbolic value of monuments in memory-making and identity formation processes. In conclusion, the paper emphasizes the importance of reconfiguring the spatial context of monuments to ensure their efficacy in processes of memorialization and identity reconstruction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非查茨沃斯和德班中部的纪念碑、纪念性和身份形成的空间联系
摘要公共空间的纪念性问题已经引起了国内外学者的广泛关注。在南非的背景下,2015年的#罗德岛必须垮台运动进一步加剧了这种兴趣,该运动提出了关于殖民雕像在转型后时代的相关性的问题。这场运动引发了广泛的关于在国家文化景观中建立纪念碑的辩论。在此背景下,本实证研究旨在通过研究纪念碑的作用,特别是它们的空间特征,在城市公共空间中塑造记忆和身份重建的过程中,为这些讨论做出贡献。该研究采用了文化制图技术,包括参与式地理信息系统(PGIS)和半结构化访谈,以生成查茨沃斯和德班中部地区的数据。此外,本研究还借鉴了Henri Lefebvre(1974)对纪念碑的概念化和Proshansky(1983)的地点认同理论,探讨了纪念碑的空间性与具身记忆在空间认同产生中的本构关系。该研究的实证结果肯定了纪念碑作为协商空间身份的场所,承认出现的记忆和身份的多样性和多样性。此外,该研究强调了纪念碑的空间背景的重要性,包括美学吸引力、地理突出性、位置性和可辨别性等维度,在影响纪念碑在记忆和身份形成过程中的象征价值。综上所述,本文强调了重新配置纪念碑的空间文脉以确保其在纪念和身份重建过程中的有效性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
GEOJOURNAL
GEOJOURNAL GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.40%
发文量
228
期刊介绍: Aims & ScopeGeoJournal is an international journal devoted to all branches of spatially integrated social sciences and humanities. This long standing journal is committed to publishing cutting-edge, innovative, original and timely research from around the world and across the whole spectrum of social sciences and humanities that have an explicit geographical/spatial component, in particular in GeoJournal’s six major areas:- Economic and Development Geography- Social and Political Geography- Cultural and Historical Geography- Health and Medical Geography- Environmental Geography and Sustainable Development - Legal/Ethical Geography and Policy In addition to research papers GeoJournal publishes reviews as well as shorter articles in the form of research notes, commentaries, and reports. Submissions should demonstrate original and substantive contributions to social science and humanities from a geographical perspective. Submissions on emerging new fields such as GeoEthics, Neogeography, Digital Humanities and other emerging topics are also welcome. GeoJournal’s focus makes the journal essential reading for human geographers working in these areas, as well as for researchers from other disciplines, such as sociology, economics, political science, demography, environmental studies, urban planning, history, and cultural studies. Last but not least, GeoJournal encourages feedbacks and discussions on articles published in the journal through letters to the editor. GeoJournal is published bi-monthly in February, April, June, August, October and December.
期刊最新文献
An Integrative Review of College Readiness Programs for Black High School Students; Opportunities for School Nurse Involvement. Advancing public interests through state ownership; the case of Port of Rotterdam Land use/land cover changes (LULCC) using remote sensing analyses in Rizal, Philippines The impact of cities’ transportation network connections on regional market integration: the case of China’s urban agglomerations Organizational arrangement of coffee growers in the Garça Region: a perspective of the localized agro-food systems approach in Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1