Criticality dimension-based probabilistic framework to detect near crashes in a roundabout

IF 4.3 3区 工程技术 European Transport Research Review Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.1186/s12544-023-00602-4
Juan Trullos, Meng Zhang, Marek Junghans, Kay Gimm
{"title":"Criticality dimension-based probabilistic framework to detect near crashes in a roundabout","authors":"Juan Trullos, Meng Zhang, Marek Junghans, Kay Gimm","doi":"10.1186/s12544-023-00602-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Preventing fatal traffic accidents towards Vision Zero is a challenge for the society. The collection of critical events from video recorded traffic data is of essential value for a better understanding on how and under what circumstances critical situations evolve. Identified behavioral patterns and derived infrastructural measures cannot only help to make driving safer, but also help to mature automated driving functions (ADFs) to make automated vehicles drive and interact more like humans especially in challenging situations. One flaw when developing ADFs is the dependency on synthetic simulated traffic scenarios. Method In this paper, a novel probability-based framework is proposed allowing to measure the degree of criticality C(d) based on two dimensions explaining risk: severity ( delta-v ) and proximity (distance). Results This metric is applied on real data of a roundabout. An initial evaluation of it was conducted using both a novel proposed method that takes the reaction of the second vehicle merged into account, and a practical application that shows a potential correlation between the traffic expert's perceived risk and the metric. Conclusion Quantifying risk on each of the collected real traffic scenarios makes testing ADFs possible in further more reliable and significant scenarios like near-crashes.","PeriodicalId":48671,"journal":{"name":"European Transport Research Review","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Transport Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-023-00602-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Preventing fatal traffic accidents towards Vision Zero is a challenge for the society. The collection of critical events from video recorded traffic data is of essential value for a better understanding on how and under what circumstances critical situations evolve. Identified behavioral patterns and derived infrastructural measures cannot only help to make driving safer, but also help to mature automated driving functions (ADFs) to make automated vehicles drive and interact more like humans especially in challenging situations. One flaw when developing ADFs is the dependency on synthetic simulated traffic scenarios. Method In this paper, a novel probability-based framework is proposed allowing to measure the degree of criticality C(d) based on two dimensions explaining risk: severity ( delta-v ) and proximity (distance). Results This metric is applied on real data of a roundabout. An initial evaluation of it was conducted using both a novel proposed method that takes the reaction of the second vehicle merged into account, and a practical application that shows a potential correlation between the traffic expert's perceived risk and the metric. Conclusion Quantifying risk on each of the collected real traffic scenarios makes testing ADFs possible in further more reliable and significant scenarios like near-crashes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于临界维数的环形交叉路口近碰撞概率检测框架
背景预防致命交通事故实现“零愿景”是社会面临的挑战。从视频记录的交通数据中收集关键事件对于更好地了解关键情况如何以及在何种情况下演变具有重要价值。确定的行为模式和衍生的基础设施措施不仅有助于提高驾驶安全性,还有助于成熟的自动驾驶功能(adf),使自动驾驶车辆更像人类驾驶和互动,特别是在具有挑战性的情况下。开发adf的一个缺陷是依赖于合成的模拟交通场景。本文提出了一种新的基于概率的框架,允许基于解释风险的两个维度来测量临界C(d)的程度:严重性(delta-v)和接近性(距离)。结果将该指标应用于环形交叉路口的实际数据。对其进行了初步评估,采用了一种将第二辆车的反应考虑在内的新方法,以及一种实际应用,显示了交通专家的感知风险与度量之间的潜在相关性。量化每个收集到的真实交通场景的风险,可以进一步在更可靠和重要的场景(如近碰撞)中测试adf。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Transport Research Review
European Transport Research Review Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: European Transport Research Review (ETRR) is a peer-reviewed open access journal publishing original high-quality scholarly research and developments in areas related to transportation science, technologies, policy and practice. Established in 2008 by the European Conference of Transport Research Institutes (ECTRI), the Journal provides researchers and practitioners around the world with an authoritative forum for the dissemination and critical discussion of new ideas and methodologies that originate in, or are of special interest to, the European transport research community. The journal is unique in its field, as it covers all modes of transport and addresses both the engineering and the social science perspective, offering a truly multidisciplinary platform for researchers, practitioners, engineers and policymakers. ETRR is aimed at a readership including researchers, practitioners in the design and operation of transportation systems, and policymakers at the international, national, regional and local levels.
期刊最新文献
Exploring hybrid models for identifying locations for active mobility pathways using real-time spatial Delphi and GANs. How accessibility to schools is not (just) a transport problem: the case of public school choice in the city of Malmö, Sweden Mobility-as-a-Service users: insights from a trial in Sydney Evaluating the impacts of the demerit points system on traffic law violations and driver involvement in road accidents in Israel Modelling public attitude towards drone delivery in Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1