Methodological principles of research in the field of ensuring evidence collection (on the example of cybercrimes): criminal-legal, criminal-procedural, and forensic aspects

Dmytro Baranenko, Alla Koval, Oleksandr Dulskyi, Yuliya Lisitsyna, Erkin Musayev
{"title":"Methodological principles of research in the field of ensuring evidence collection (on the example of cybercrimes): criminal-legal, criminal-procedural, and forensic aspects","authors":"Dmytro Baranenko, Alla Koval, Oleksandr Dulskyi, Yuliya Lisitsyna, Erkin Musayev","doi":"10.34069/ai/2023.67.07.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The complexity, multifacetedness, and interdisciplinary status of ensuring the collection of evidence leads to the need to study it in the coordinate system set by different levels of scientific methodology. With this in mind, we consider it necessary to analyze the current issues of study methodology in ensuring evidence collection on the basis of cybercrimes. The purpose of the work is studying the criminal-legal, criminal-procedural, and forensic aspects of the methodological foundations of research in securing evidence on the example of cybercrimes. The research methodology includes such methods as the general system-structural method, the dialectical method, the historical method, the system method, the comparative-legal method, logical methods (deduction, induction, analogy, analysis, synthesis), the structural-logical method, and the modeling method. As a conclusion of the conducted research, the regulatory and legal factors that constitute the legal basis of the organizational and technical principles of the investigation of crimes in the field of cybercrime were considered, and the problematic issues of the research methodology were identified. It was concluded that the methodological support of the research of evidence collection is a complex, multifaceted task of scientific research, it can be solved only on the basis of a systematic approach to this problem.","PeriodicalId":500971,"journal":{"name":"Revista Amazonía investiga","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Amazonía investiga","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34069/ai/2023.67.07.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The complexity, multifacetedness, and interdisciplinary status of ensuring the collection of evidence leads to the need to study it in the coordinate system set by different levels of scientific methodology. With this in mind, we consider it necessary to analyze the current issues of study methodology in ensuring evidence collection on the basis of cybercrimes. The purpose of the work is studying the criminal-legal, criminal-procedural, and forensic aspects of the methodological foundations of research in securing evidence on the example of cybercrimes. The research methodology includes such methods as the general system-structural method, the dialectical method, the historical method, the system method, the comparative-legal method, logical methods (deduction, induction, analogy, analysis, synthesis), the structural-logical method, and the modeling method. As a conclusion of the conducted research, the regulatory and legal factors that constitute the legal basis of the organizational and technical principles of the investigation of crimes in the field of cybercrime were considered, and the problematic issues of the research methodology were identified. It was concluded that the methodological support of the research of evidence collection is a complex, multifaceted task of scientific research, it can be solved only on the basis of a systematic approach to this problem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确保证据收集领域的研究方法原则(以网络犯罪为例):刑事法律,刑事程序和法医方面
确保证据收集的复杂性、多面性和跨学科性导致需要在不同层次的科学方法论所设置的坐标系中进行研究。考虑到这一点,我们认为有必要分析当前的研究方法问题,以确保在网络犯罪的基础上收集证据。这项工作的目的是研究刑事法律,刑事程序和法医方面的研究方法基础,以确保网络犯罪的证据为例。研究方法包括一般系统结构法、辩证法、历史法、系统法、比较法、逻辑法(演绎、归纳、类比、分析、综合)、结构逻辑法、建模法等。作为所进行研究的结论,考虑了构成网络犯罪领域犯罪调查的组织和技术原则的法律基础的监管和法律因素,并确定了研究方法中的问题。结论是,证据收集研究的方法论支持是一项复杂的、多方面的科学研究任务,只有在对这一问题采取系统方法的基础上才能得到解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Electronic judiciary in Ukraine: Problems of implementation and possible solutions Using the folklore and poetry by Sergei Yesenin in Russian as a foreign language lessons: an online class Psychological features of training future social workers Factors influencing the effectiveness of proving criminal offences during trial The right to information from the point of view of legal theory, international law and international relations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1