Is an elliptic jet quieter than a round jet?

Abstract

Non-axisymmetric geometries, mainly elliptic and rectangular, have been proposed for the reduction of jet noise vis-à-vis round nozzles. Most of the studies of these nozzles are from unheated jets and are restricted to nozzles of very small size. Furthermore, all of them have been carried out at static conditions, thereby rendering their value to insignificance for practical applications. All engines in service with long ducts and a confluent nozzle incorporate an internal lobed mixer. The aeroacoustic characteristics of an elliptic compound nozzle that represents the geometry of an existing low bypass ratio (BPR) turbofan engine, is investigated at 1/7th scale in this study. Typical engine cycle conditions are chosen; data are acquired statically and in the presence of a flight stream. The aspect ratio of the nozzle is 2.0; higher aspect ratios are not suitable for engine applications. The results are compared with a round compound nozzle with the same internal geometry, so as to assess the acoustic benefit, if any, of the elliptic nozzle. Both a simple internal splitter and an in-service lobed mixer have been considered. The elliptic nozzle introduces azimuthal asymmetry even for an unheated jet; the magnitude of azimuthal variation becomes pronounced for heated jets. Typically, the lowest level of noise is observed towards the narrow side of the elliptic nozzle (ϕ = 0°); the noise level gradually increases and reaches a maximum towards the broader side (ϕ = 90°). Though there are some superficial similarities between the elliptic and beveled nozzles, it is shown that the noise characteristics are very different. A systematic study is carried out, with step-by-step build up to realistic geometry, with forward flight. A large noise reduction of ∼3 to ∼4 EPNdB is observed for the splitter nozzle under static conditions. The introduction of a realistic lobed mixer reduces this benefit to close to zero. Finally, there is a noise increase at all azimuthal angles with forward flight. Therefore, the elliptic nozzle does not provide any EPNL benefit for actual nozzle geometry and consequently does not constitute a viable design for noise reduction. The importance of evaluating noise reduction concepts using appropriate geometry and under realistic forward flight conditions is emphasized once again.