Архітектура регіонального представництва в системах багаторівневих відносин

Ю. В. Узун
{"title":"Архітектура регіонального представництва в системах багаторівневих відносин","authors":"Ю. В. Узун","doi":"10.31558/2519-2949.2023.3.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyses the complex of institutions that perform the functions of regional representation in the context of global transformation of territorial and political systems. It is noted that glocalisation as a specific process of the second half of the twentieth century has led to: 1) the rise of the role of regions of different scales in the implementation of the global action programme aimed at ensuring the needs and human rights, interests of local regional communities, 2) strengthening the functional capacity of subnational regions by reducing the distance of political participation in supranational integration macro-regional systems. The paper demonstrates the theoretical and methodological basis for the formation of a new architecture of glocal political relations, which is constructed on the basis of the following principles: rejection of \"methodological nationalism\", accompanied by the definition of localities and regions as the main object of research; replacement of the top-down logic of analysis (from the state to regions and localities) with the bottom-up logic (from self-government systems to national systems and supranational systems such as the EU); substantiation of political space as the result of cooperation of social and political actors. The paper is built around several problems of constitutionalising regional representation in political systems: 1) the correlation of territorial and political contexts of regional participation in systems of macro-regional integration interaction; 2) electoral systems that technically provide models of representation; 3) parliamentary supranational macro-regional representation, by which each elected region represents itself in the global context of international relations; 4) parliamentary and extra-parliamentary ways of representing subnational regions. The paper concludes that the process of institutionalisation of extra-parliamentary forms of regional representation is underway, which are replacing the traditional form of territorial representation represented by bicameralism. The modern logic of institutionalisation is based on the recognition of asymmetric functionally determined forms of representation of regional interests in networks of intergovernmental structures, built not so much on the basis of the representation model as on the basis of participation and coordination.","PeriodicalId":477981,"journal":{"name":"Політичне життя","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Політичне життя","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31558/2519-2949.2023.3.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper analyses the complex of institutions that perform the functions of regional representation in the context of global transformation of territorial and political systems. It is noted that glocalisation as a specific process of the second half of the twentieth century has led to: 1) the rise of the role of regions of different scales in the implementation of the global action programme aimed at ensuring the needs and human rights, interests of local regional communities, 2) strengthening the functional capacity of subnational regions by reducing the distance of political participation in supranational integration macro-regional systems. The paper demonstrates the theoretical and methodological basis for the formation of a new architecture of glocal political relations, which is constructed on the basis of the following principles: rejection of "methodological nationalism", accompanied by the definition of localities and regions as the main object of research; replacement of the top-down logic of analysis (from the state to regions and localities) with the bottom-up logic (from self-government systems to national systems and supranational systems such as the EU); substantiation of political space as the result of cooperation of social and political actors. The paper is built around several problems of constitutionalising regional representation in political systems: 1) the correlation of territorial and political contexts of regional participation in systems of macro-regional integration interaction; 2) electoral systems that technically provide models of representation; 3) parliamentary supranational macro-regional representation, by which each elected region represents itself in the global context of international relations; 4) parliamentary and extra-parliamentary ways of representing subnational regions. The paper concludes that the process of institutionalisation of extra-parliamentary forms of regional representation is underway, which are replacing the traditional form of territorial representation represented by bicameralism. The modern logic of institutionalisation is based on the recognition of asymmetric functionally determined forms of representation of regional interests in networks of intergovernmental structures, built not so much on the basis of the representation model as on the basis of participation and coordination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多层次关系体系中的地区代表性架构
本文分析了在领土和政治制度的全球转型背景下,履行区域代表性职能的机构的复杂性。值得注意的是,全球化作为20世纪下半叶的一个具体进程,导致了:1)不同规模的区域在执行旨在确保地方区域社区的需求和人权利益的全球行动方案中的作用的上升,2)通过缩短政治参与超国家一体化宏观区域系统的距离,加强次国家区域的功能能力。本文论证了全球地方政治关系新架构形成的理论和方法基础,该架构的构建基于以下原则:拒绝“方法论民族主义”,并将地方和地区界定为主要研究对象;将自上而下的分析逻辑(从国家到地区和地方)替换为自下而上的分析逻辑(从自治系统到国家系统和超国家系统,如欧盟);政治空间的实体化是社会和政治行动者合作的结果。本文围绕政治制度中区域代表权宪政化的几个问题展开:1)宏观区域一体化互动体系中区域参与的地域和政治语境的相关性;2)在技术上提供代表模式的选举制度;3)议会超国家宏观地区代表制,每个当选地区在国际关系的全球背景下代表自己;4)以议会和议会外的方式代表地方。本文的结论是,地区代表制的议会外形式的制度化进程正在进行中,它正在取代以两院制为代表的传统领土代表制形式。制度化的现代逻辑是基于对政府间结构网络中区域利益代表的不对称功能决定形式的认识,而不是建立在代表模型的基础上,而是建立在参与和协调的基础上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Теоретичні засади моделювання публічно-політичних процесів Асинхронність демократизації як глобальний тренд формування нового світопорядку Особливості тлумачення влади через панування Умови формування прикордонних територій в історико-політологічному контексті становлення світопорядку Архітектура регіонального представництва в системах багаторівневих відносин
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1