Sistematik Bir İnceleme ve Meta-Analiz: Pediatrik ve Ergen Popülasyonlarda Akut Migren Tedavisi

Emine ÖZDEMİR KAÇER, Can ATEŞ
{"title":"Sistematik Bir İnceleme ve Meta-Analiz: Pediatrik ve Ergen Popülasyonlarda Akut Migren Tedavisi","authors":"Emine ÖZDEMİR KAÇER, Can ATEŞ","doi":"10.16899/jcm.1347057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Backgrounds: The array of medications used to treat acute migraine in adults is extensive, with several now authorized for use in children and adolescents in outpatient settings. 
 Aims: The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the impact of pharmacological interventions, regardless of the method of delivery, compared to placebo, in treating migraine among individuals aged 18 years or younger. 
 Materials and Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for comparative RCTs published 30 years before May 2023. We included prospective randomized controlled clinical trials of children and adolescents with migraine, comparing acute symptom-relieving migraine medications with a placebo. 
 Results: Twelve clinical trials were included in this meta-analysis. The migraine treatment choice and the proportion of patients with complete pain relief at 2 hours post-treatment were analyzed. Ibuprofen (n=2), sumatriptan (n=3), zolmitriptan (n=3), and rizatriptan (n=4) were used for the analysis. Notably, sumatriptan did not exhibit significant differences compared to placebo, despite mixed individual study outcomes (OR:1.35; 95% CI 0.81, 2.27). Rizatriptan displayed varying efficacies across age groups, showing no significant difference in adolescents aged 12-17 years (p>0.05). Zolmitriptan showed dose-dependent effectiveness, with higher doses yielding better outcomes (OR:2.18; 95% CI 1.45,3.28). Ibuprofen emerged as the sole non-triptan medication to demonstrate efficacy in achieving pain-free status at 2 hours, with a favorable safety profile (OR:2.54; 95% CI 1.20, 5.37).
 Conclusion: These findings suggest that ibuprofen, zolmitriptan, and rizatriptan are potential treatment options for rapidly relieving migraine in children and adolescents. However, ibuprofen may have advantages over triptans, owing to its convenience and cost-effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":15449,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16899/jcm.1347057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds: The array of medications used to treat acute migraine in adults is extensive, with several now authorized for use in children and adolescents in outpatient settings. Aims: The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the impact of pharmacological interventions, regardless of the method of delivery, compared to placebo, in treating migraine among individuals aged 18 years or younger. Materials and Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for comparative RCTs published 30 years before May 2023. We included prospective randomized controlled clinical trials of children and adolescents with migraine, comparing acute symptom-relieving migraine medications with a placebo. Results: Twelve clinical trials were included in this meta-analysis. The migraine treatment choice and the proportion of patients with complete pain relief at 2 hours post-treatment were analyzed. Ibuprofen (n=2), sumatriptan (n=3), zolmitriptan (n=3), and rizatriptan (n=4) were used for the analysis. Notably, sumatriptan did not exhibit significant differences compared to placebo, despite mixed individual study outcomes (OR:1.35; 95% CI 0.81, 2.27). Rizatriptan displayed varying efficacies across age groups, showing no significant difference in adolescents aged 12-17 years (p>0.05). Zolmitriptan showed dose-dependent effectiveness, with higher doses yielding better outcomes (OR:2.18; 95% CI 1.45,3.28). Ibuprofen emerged as the sole non-triptan medication to demonstrate efficacy in achieving pain-free status at 2 hours, with a favorable safety profile (OR:2.54; 95% CI 1.20, 5.37). Conclusion: These findings suggest that ibuprofen, zolmitriptan, and rizatriptan are potential treatment options for rapidly relieving migraine in children and adolescents. However, ibuprofen may have advantages over triptans, owing to its convenience and cost-effectiveness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统回顾与元分析:儿童和青少年急性偏头痛的治疗
背景:用于治疗成人急性偏头痛的药物种类繁多,其中一些现已被批准用于儿童和青少年的门诊治疗。& # x0D;目的:本荟萃分析的目的是评估药物干预在治疗18岁或18岁以下偏头痛患者中的影响,而不考虑给药方式,与安慰剂相比。& # x0D;材料和方法:我们检索PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆,检索2023年5月前30年发表的比较rct。我们纳入了儿童和青少年偏头痛患者的前瞻性随机对照临床试验,比较急性症状缓解偏头痛药物与安慰剂。& # x0D;结果:本荟萃分析纳入了12项临床试验。分析偏头痛治疗方案的选择及治疗后2小时疼痛完全缓解的患者比例。采用布洛芬(n=2)、舒马曲坦(n=3)、唑米曲坦(n=3)、利扎曲坦(n=4)进行分析。值得注意的是,尽管个体研究结果混杂,但与安慰剂相比,舒马曲坦没有显著差异(OR:1.35;95% ci 0.81, 2.27)。利扎曲坦在不同年龄组的疗效不同,在12-17岁的青少年中无显著差异(p < 0.05)。佐米曲坦显示剂量依赖性的有效性,高剂量产生更好的结果(OR:2.18;95% ci 1.45,3.28)。布洛芬是唯一一种非曲坦类药物,可以在2小时内达到无痛状态,并且具有良好的安全性(OR:2.54;95% CI 1.20, 5.37)。 结论:这些发现表明布洛芬、唑米曲坦和利扎曲坦是快速缓解儿童和青少年偏头痛的潜在治疗选择。然而,布洛芬由于其便利性和成本效益,可能比曲坦类药物有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The association between six-minute walk test and one minute sit to stand test in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD INVESTIGATION OF THE ADJECTIVES IN TERMINOLOGIA ANATOMICA, IN TERMS RELATED TO THE NERVOUS SYSTEM AND SENSE ORGANS Smoking and Real Life Results of Children and Adolescents Correlation of Capillary Tube and Transcutaneous Methods with Serum Biochemistry in Bilirubin Levels in Neonates with Jaundice Current follow-up results of Cyanotic Congenital Heart Diseases detected during Pregnancy in a specific Region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1