Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Cooling Spray and Saline Spray in Wrist Trauma; Randomized Controlled Double Blind Study

Serkan BİLGİN, Mehmet Göktuğ EFGAN
{"title":"Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Cooling Spray and Saline Spray in Wrist Trauma; Randomized Controlled Double Blind Study","authors":"Serkan BİLGİN, Mehmet Göktuğ EFGAN","doi":"10.16899/jcm.1341824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cooling spray application is commonly used in sports injuries to manage acute pain and reduce tissue edema. However, its effectiveness in treating acute trauma in the emergency department remains understudied. This prospective randomized controlled trial assessed the efficacy of cooling spray for pain management in patients with wrist injuries.
 Methods: A randomized trial was conducted in a tertiary care hospital's trauma department. Patients with wrist trauma were assigned to cooling spray or placebo (saline spray) groups. Cooling spray was Cryos®Spray (Phyto Performance, Italy), while placebo was chilled saline in an identical bottle. Pain scores and radiographic images were evaluated.
 
 Results: In 131 patients (mean age: 35.60±19.58 years, 26.7% fractures), cooling spray (n=73) yielded a delta pain score of 1.74±1.88, while saline (n=58) had 0.84±1.54 (p=0.003). For fracture patients, cooling spray's delta score was 2.26±1.88, compared to saline's 0.0±0.96 (","PeriodicalId":15449,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16899/jcm.1341824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cooling spray application is commonly used in sports injuries to manage acute pain and reduce tissue edema. However, its effectiveness in treating acute trauma in the emergency department remains understudied. This prospective randomized controlled trial assessed the efficacy of cooling spray for pain management in patients with wrist injuries. Methods: A randomized trial was conducted in a tertiary care hospital's trauma department. Patients with wrist trauma were assigned to cooling spray or placebo (saline spray) groups. Cooling spray was Cryos®Spray (Phyto Performance, Italy), while placebo was chilled saline in an identical bottle. Pain scores and radiographic images were evaluated. Results: In 131 patients (mean age: 35.60±19.58 years, 26.7% fractures), cooling spray (n=73) yielded a delta pain score of 1.74±1.88, while saline (n=58) had 0.84±1.54 (p=0.003). For fracture patients, cooling spray's delta score was 2.26±1.88, compared to saline's 0.0±0.96 (
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冷却喷雾与生理盐水喷雾治疗腕部外伤镇痛效果的比较随机对照双盲研究
背景:冷却喷雾应用通常用于运动损伤治疗急性疼痛和减少组织水肿。然而,其在急诊科治疗急性创伤的有效性仍未得到充分研究。这项前瞻性随机对照试验评估了冷却喷雾对手腕损伤患者疼痛管理的疗效。方法:在某三级医院创伤科进行随机试验。腕部外伤患者被分为冷却喷雾组和安慰剂(生理盐水喷雾)组。冷却喷雾为Cryos®spray (Phyto Performance, Italy),安慰剂为同一瓶的冷冻生理盐水。评估疼痛评分和x线影像。 & # x0D;结果:131例患者(平均年龄35.60±19.58岁,骨折26.7%)中,冷却喷雾(n=73)的疼痛评分为1.74±1.88,生理盐水(n=58)的疼痛评分为0.84±1.54 (p=0.003)。对于骨折患者,冷却喷雾的delta评分为2.26±1.88,而生理盐水的delta评分为0.0±0.96。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The association between six-minute walk test and one minute sit to stand test in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD INVESTIGATION OF THE ADJECTIVES IN TERMINOLOGIA ANATOMICA, IN TERMS RELATED TO THE NERVOUS SYSTEM AND SENSE ORGANS Smoking and Real Life Results of Children and Adolescents Correlation of Capillary Tube and Transcutaneous Methods with Serum Biochemistry in Bilirubin Levels in Neonates with Jaundice Current follow-up results of Cyanotic Congenital Heart Diseases detected during Pregnancy in a specific Region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1