Cognitive presence in learner–content interaction process: The role of scaffolding in online self-regulated learning environments

IF 4.3 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Computers in Education Pub Date : 2023-06-21 DOI:10.1007/s40692-023-00279-7
Md Abdullah Al Mamun, Gwendolyn Lawrie
{"title":"Cognitive presence in learner–content interaction process: The role of scaffolding in online self-regulated learning environments","authors":"Md Abdullah Al Mamun, Gwendolyn Lawrie","doi":"10.1007/s40692-023-00279-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The effectiveness of learner–content interaction in online inquiry depends on the extent student cognitive presence can be fostered. This study sought to understand how scaffolding support enhances cognitive presence during the learner–content interaction process in the online environment. Two learning modules on introductory science concepts were developed incorporating the predict observe explain (POE) pedagogical framework. Students engaged with these learning modules to learn the science concepts independently. Data sources comprised post-module interviews, written responses, and observations of student interactions with the online learning modules. Analysis of discussions revealed that the adopted pedagogical framework can effectively foster student cognitive presence during the learner–content interaction process. Findings further revealed that the scaffolding elements embedded into the learning modules contribute to the emergence of higher levels of cognitive presence especially for the students with prior knowledge. Conversely, this study provides evidence that students may develop misconceptions about the science concepts even with the embedded scaffolding and guidance. This study calls for further research into the continual improvement of the pedagogical approach to stimulate cognitive presence for both advanced and novice learners and reduce the potential risk of misconceptions occurring during the learner–content interaction process.","PeriodicalId":45855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computers in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computers in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00279-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The effectiveness of learner–content interaction in online inquiry depends on the extent student cognitive presence can be fostered. This study sought to understand how scaffolding support enhances cognitive presence during the learner–content interaction process in the online environment. Two learning modules on introductory science concepts were developed incorporating the predict observe explain (POE) pedagogical framework. Students engaged with these learning modules to learn the science concepts independently. Data sources comprised post-module interviews, written responses, and observations of student interactions with the online learning modules. Analysis of discussions revealed that the adopted pedagogical framework can effectively foster student cognitive presence during the learner–content interaction process. Findings further revealed that the scaffolding elements embedded into the learning modules contribute to the emergence of higher levels of cognitive presence especially for the students with prior knowledge. Conversely, this study provides evidence that students may develop misconceptions about the science concepts even with the embedded scaffolding and guidance. This study calls for further research into the continual improvement of the pedagogical approach to stimulate cognitive presence for both advanced and novice learners and reduce the potential risk of misconceptions occurring during the learner–content interaction process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习者-内容互动过程中的认知存在:网络自我调节学习环境中脚手架的作用
在线探究中学习者-内容互动的有效性取决于培养学生认知在场的程度。本研究旨在了解在网络环境下,脚手架支持如何增强学习者-内容互动过程中的认知存在。结合预测观察解释(POE)教学框架,开发了两个入门科学概念学习模块。学生通过这些学习模块独立学习科学概念。数据来源包括模块后访谈、书面回复以及学生与在线学习模块互动的观察。讨论分析表明,所采用的教学框架可以有效地培养学生在学习者-内容互动过程中的认知在场。研究结果进一步表明,嵌入学习模块的脚手架元素有助于出现更高水平的认知存在,特别是对于具有先验知识的学生。相反,本研究提供的证据表明,即使有嵌入式脚手架和指导,学生也可能对科学概念产生误解。本研究需要进一步研究持续改进教学方法,以刺激高级和初级学习者的认知存在,并减少在学习者-内容互动过程中发生误解的潜在风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computers in Education
Journal of Computers in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
1.60%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: JCE is an interdisciplinary forum for communication of perspectives among researchers, practitioner, and policy makers on theories and practices in technology enhanced learning. The journal aims at making an impact on educational practices and thus to transform learning.  The journal publishes up-to-date research and experiences in information communication technologies (ICT) in learning and education.  Authors are encouraged to submit papers related, but not limited, to the following topics of interest:1. Hotspots and Frontiers – reporting on current research and policy initiatives as well as national or international key research projects in the field ICT in education. 2. Instruction and Design - theoretical and methodological issues related to instructional design, curriculum development, and the role of technology in instructional transformation, particularly issues from social, cultural, psychological, cognitive, and pedagogical perspectives. 3. Learning and Technology - issues of learning technologies from theoretical and pedagogical perspectives. Specifically, it covers ubiquitous learning, human intelligence as well as other emerging technologies in education. 4. Media and Tools - patterns of educational communications and state-of-the-art educational media as well as instructional tools, which encompass learning management systems, interactive learning systems, knowledge visual tools, thinking training tools, as well as educational virtual reality systems and educational games.5. Academic Reviews - reviews on important works and publications in the field of ICT in education.
期刊最新文献
Predictive analysis of Metaverse usage intention in the Spanish University Exploring the educational digital landscape in the Dominican Republic: a comparative study of competencies in different stages and socio-digital environments Fixed achievement, boredom's course: identify the role of implicit theories of intelligence, achievement emotions and online learning engagement Unleashing the transformers: NLP models detect AI writing in education The role of contextual and individual factors in successful e-learning experiences during and after the pandemic – a two-year study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1