"Prosecutorial Discretion: An Imperative for Effective Prosecution in the Punjab Criminal Prosecution Service"

Hafiz Muhammad Azeem, Mubashar Tariq, Muhammad Umar
{"title":"\"Prosecutorial Discretion: An Imperative for Effective Prosecution in the Punjab Criminal Prosecution Service\"","authors":"Hafiz Muhammad Azeem, Mubashar Tariq, Muhammad Umar","doi":"10.47067/real.v6i2.351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a welfare state, the necessity for a certain level of discretion is widely acknowledged. Discretion plays a crucial role in law enforcement practices and is essential for the effective administration of justice. Within international Criminal Justice Systems, prosecutors have a pivotal responsibility in upholding the rule of law. Given their position within the executive branch, prosecutorial discretion becomes imperative. It is vital to observe that discretion itself is not inherently damaging; however, unchecked and absolute discretion can lead to adverse outcomes. The goal should not be the elimination of discretion, but rather its structured implementation. Within the realm of the criminal justice system, where both the law enforcement agencies and the court possess considerable discretion in pursuit of justice, it follows that the prosecution should also possess a degree of discretion. Without equipping the prosecution with essential discretionary tools, the Punjab Criminal Prosecution Service would be unable to effectively fulfill its role in criminal justice system. Consequently, the time has come to empower the prosecution with the necessary discretion it requires, especially the discretion to decide whether to prosecute or not which stands as a vital prerogative that prosecutors must possess to uphold the justice.","PeriodicalId":500968,"journal":{"name":"Review of education, administration and law","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of education, administration and law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47067/real.v6i2.351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a welfare state, the necessity for a certain level of discretion is widely acknowledged. Discretion plays a crucial role in law enforcement practices and is essential for the effective administration of justice. Within international Criminal Justice Systems, prosecutors have a pivotal responsibility in upholding the rule of law. Given their position within the executive branch, prosecutorial discretion becomes imperative. It is vital to observe that discretion itself is not inherently damaging; however, unchecked and absolute discretion can lead to adverse outcomes. The goal should not be the elimination of discretion, but rather its structured implementation. Within the realm of the criminal justice system, where both the law enforcement agencies and the court possess considerable discretion in pursuit of justice, it follows that the prosecution should also possess a degree of discretion. Without equipping the prosecution with essential discretionary tools, the Punjab Criminal Prosecution Service would be unable to effectively fulfill its role in criminal justice system. Consequently, the time has come to empower the prosecution with the necessary discretion it requires, especially the discretion to decide whether to prosecute or not which stands as a vital prerogative that prosecutors must possess to uphold the justice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“检控自由裁量权:旁遮普省刑事检控部门有效检控的必要条件”
在一个福利国家,一定程度的自由裁量权的必要性得到了广泛认可。自由裁量权在执法实践中起着至关重要的作用,对有效司法至关重要。在国际刑事司法系统内,检察官在维护法治方面负有关键责任。鉴于他们在行政部门中的地位,检察官的自由裁量权变得势在必行。至关重要的是要注意,自由裁量权本身并不具有固有的破坏性;然而,未经检查和绝对的自由裁量权可能导致不利的结果。我们的目标不应该是消除自由裁量权,而是有组织地实施它。在刑事司法制度领域内,执法机构和法院在追求正义方面都拥有相当大的自由裁量权,因此,控方也应拥有一定程度的自由裁量权。如果不为检察机关配备必要的自由裁量工具,旁遮普省刑事检控处将无法有效地履行其在刑事司法系统中的作用。因此,现在是赋予检察机关必要的自由裁量权的时候了,特别是决定是否起诉的自由裁量权,这是检察官必须拥有的维护正义的重要特权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors Affecting the Office of Justice of Peace in Punjab, Pakistan: A Critical Study Critical Analysis on the Importance of Literature in Advancing Human Rights "Prosecutorial Discretion: An Imperative for Effective Prosecution in the Punjab Criminal Prosecution Service" Perceptions of Head Teachers about Whole School Development Plan in the Province of Punjab An Overview of Criminal Justice System to Uphold the Supremacy of Law in a Sovereign State: An International Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1