Cause naturali e influssi diabolici: Cardano sulle streghe e i demoni

Laura Cesco-Frare
{"title":"Cause naturali e influssi diabolici: Cardano sulle streghe e i demoni","authors":"Laura Cesco-Frare","doi":"10.21747/21836884/med40a9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution proposes an interpretation of Girolamo Cardano’s views on witchcraft. To this end, the paper offers a reading of chapter LXXX of Cardano’s De rerum varietate (1557), where he exam-ines the nature of the so-called witches, in light of the broader framework of Cardano’s philosophy, relating it back to the concepts of varietas and subtilitas, as well as his focus on the conjecturales dis-ciplinae. Then, Cardano’s thought is contrasted with two late-medieval authors, namely John Buridan (with the figure of the vetula) and Peter of Abano (with his views on demonic influxes). Against the background of this analysis, it emerges that Cardano views witchcraft as belonging to the natural and human sphere, as a phenomenon that ultimately rests on a series of social and physiological factors, though he does not exclude completely the eventuality of supernatural influxes on worldly affairs: this complex picture cannot thus be reduced to one of the opposing poles of the Renaissance debate on the nature of witchcraft.","PeriodicalId":497912,"journal":{"name":"Mediaevalia, textos e estudos","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediaevalia, textos e estudos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21747/21836884/med40a9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This contribution proposes an interpretation of Girolamo Cardano’s views on witchcraft. To this end, the paper offers a reading of chapter LXXX of Cardano’s De rerum varietate (1557), where he exam-ines the nature of the so-called witches, in light of the broader framework of Cardano’s philosophy, relating it back to the concepts of varietas and subtilitas, as well as his focus on the conjecturales dis-ciplinae. Then, Cardano’s thought is contrasted with two late-medieval authors, namely John Buridan (with the figure of the vetula) and Peter of Abano (with his views on demonic influxes). Against the background of this analysis, it emerges that Cardano views witchcraft as belonging to the natural and human sphere, as a phenomenon that ultimately rests on a series of social and physiological factors, though he does not exclude completely the eventuality of supernatural influxes on worldly affairs: this complex picture cannot thus be reduced to one of the opposing poles of the Renaissance debate on the nature of witchcraft.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自然原因和魔鬼的影响,女巫和恶魔的负担
这篇文章提出了对吉罗拉莫·卡尔达诺关于巫术的观点的解释。为此,本文提供了对卡尔达诺的《多样性》(1557)第LXXX章的阅读,在卡尔达诺哲学的更广泛框架下,他检查了所谓女巫的本质,将其与多样性和可变性的概念联系起来,以及他对推测学科的关注。然后,将卡尔达诺的思想与中世纪后期的两位作家进行对比,即约翰·布里丹(用维纳斯的形象)和阿巴诺的彼得(用他对恶魔流入的看法)。在这种分析的背景下,卡尔达诺认为巫术属于自然和人类领域,是一种最终取决于一系列社会和生理因素的现象,尽管他并没有完全排除超自然因素对世俗事务的影响:因此,这种复杂的图景不能被简化为文艺复兴时期关于巫术本质辩论的对立两极之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
De syllogismo falsigrapho: The Colonial Reception of Deceptive Arguments (From 13th to 18th Centuries) Finzioni a fin di bene: la persona ficta, l’inganno artistico contro la menzogna come tradimento Finzione nel discorso filosofico medievale: una riflessione conclusiva Cause naturali e influssi diabolici: Cardano sulle streghe e i demoni Fictiones nelle filosofie medievali e filosofie medievali nelle fictions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1