Alcuni utilizzi degli enti finzionali nel dibattito metafisico tra Enrico di Gand e Giovanni Duns Scoto

Jacopo Francesco Falà
{"title":"Alcuni utilizzi degli enti finzionali nel dibattito metafisico tra Enrico di Gand e Giovanni Duns Scoto","authors":"Jacopo Francesco Falà","doi":"10.21747/21836884/med40a6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The debate between Henry of Ghent and John Duns Scotus about the status of fictional beings has profound repercussions on the overall elaboration of the two thinkers’ metaphysical theories. Diffe-rent conceptions related to entities such as ‘chimera’ or ‘hircocervus’ are related to more general and different descriptions of creatural essences, and to the dynamics of the divine knowledge of these same essences, involving the determination of speculative concepts such as ratitudo, aliquitas and res a reor reris. This contribution takes into consideration the doctrines on the subject of these two authors, both readers of Avicenna, and the question 17 of the Collationes oxonienses, where a Fran-ciscan influenced by Henry of Ghent and Scotus (or one of his follower) discuss on fictional beings. A new interpretation of the collatio is given, not entirely coinciding with those found in secondary literature.","PeriodicalId":497912,"journal":{"name":"Mediaevalia, textos e estudos","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediaevalia, textos e estudos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21747/21836884/med40a6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The debate between Henry of Ghent and John Duns Scotus about the status of fictional beings has profound repercussions on the overall elaboration of the two thinkers’ metaphysical theories. Diffe-rent conceptions related to entities such as ‘chimera’ or ‘hircocervus’ are related to more general and different descriptions of creatural essences, and to the dynamics of the divine knowledge of these same essences, involving the determination of speculative concepts such as ratitudo, aliquitas and res a reor reris. This contribution takes into consideration the doctrines on the subject of these two authors, both readers of Avicenna, and the question 17 of the Collationes oxonienses, where a Fran-ciscan influenced by Henry of Ghent and Scotus (or one of his follower) discuss on fictional beings. A new interpretation of the collatio is given, not entirely coinciding with those found in secondary literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在根特的亨利和约翰·邓斯·斯科托之间的形而上学辩论中,虚构实体的一些用途
根特的亨利和约翰·邓斯·司各脱关于虚构人物地位的争论对两位思想家的形而上学理论的整体阐述产生了深远的影响。与实体相关的不同概念,如“chimera”或“hircocervus”,与更一般和不同的生物本质描述有关,与这些相同本质的神性知识的动态有关,涉及到诸如比率(ratitudo)、流动性(aliquitas)和复归性(res a reor reris)等思辨性概念的确定。这一贡献考虑到这两位作者的教义,他们都是阿维森纳的读者,以及Collationes oxonienses的问题17,其中受根特的亨利和斯科特(或他的追随者之一)影响的方济各会士讨论了虚构的存在。一个新的解释的校勘给出,不完全符合那些发现在二手文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
De syllogismo falsigrapho: The Colonial Reception of Deceptive Arguments (From 13th to 18th Centuries) Finzioni a fin di bene: la persona ficta, l’inganno artistico contro la menzogna come tradimento Finzione nel discorso filosofico medievale: una riflessione conclusiva Cause naturali e influssi diabolici: Cardano sulle streghe e i demoni Fictiones nelle filosofie medievali e filosofie medievali nelle fictions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1