{"title":"Alcuni utilizzi degli enti finzionali nel dibattito metafisico tra Enrico di Gand e Giovanni Duns Scoto","authors":"Jacopo Francesco Falà","doi":"10.21747/21836884/med40a6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The debate between Henry of Ghent and John Duns Scotus about the status of fictional beings has profound repercussions on the overall elaboration of the two thinkers’ metaphysical theories. Diffe-rent conceptions related to entities such as ‘chimera’ or ‘hircocervus’ are related to more general and different descriptions of creatural essences, and to the dynamics of the divine knowledge of these same essences, involving the determination of speculative concepts such as ratitudo, aliquitas and res a reor reris. This contribution takes into consideration the doctrines on the subject of these two authors, both readers of Avicenna, and the question 17 of the Collationes oxonienses, where a Fran-ciscan influenced by Henry of Ghent and Scotus (or one of his follower) discuss on fictional beings. A new interpretation of the collatio is given, not entirely coinciding with those found in secondary literature.","PeriodicalId":497912,"journal":{"name":"Mediaevalia, textos e estudos","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediaevalia, textos e estudos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21747/21836884/med40a6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The debate between Henry of Ghent and John Duns Scotus about the status of fictional beings has profound repercussions on the overall elaboration of the two thinkers’ metaphysical theories. Diffe-rent conceptions related to entities such as ‘chimera’ or ‘hircocervus’ are related to more general and different descriptions of creatural essences, and to the dynamics of the divine knowledge of these same essences, involving the determination of speculative concepts such as ratitudo, aliquitas and res a reor reris. This contribution takes into consideration the doctrines on the subject of these two authors, both readers of Avicenna, and the question 17 of the Collationes oxonienses, where a Fran-ciscan influenced by Henry of Ghent and Scotus (or one of his follower) discuss on fictional beings. A new interpretation of the collatio is given, not entirely coinciding with those found in secondary literature.
根特的亨利和约翰·邓斯·司各脱关于虚构人物地位的争论对两位思想家的形而上学理论的整体阐述产生了深远的影响。与实体相关的不同概念,如“chimera”或“hircocervus”,与更一般和不同的生物本质描述有关,与这些相同本质的神性知识的动态有关,涉及到诸如比率(ratitudo)、流动性(aliquitas)和复归性(res a reor reris)等思辨性概念的确定。这一贡献考虑到这两位作者的教义,他们都是阿维森纳的读者,以及Collationes oxonienses的问题17,其中受根特的亨利和斯科特(或他的追随者之一)影响的方济各会士讨论了虚构的存在。一个新的解释的校勘给出,不完全符合那些发现在二手文献。