Cognitive Domain Levels In “English For Nusantara” Textbook : A Revised Bloom's Taxonomy Analysis

Anak Agung Putu Arsana, Anak Agung Putri Maharani, I Kadek Joni Arta, Ayu Diah Adnya Nirmala, Rahma Syahlani
{"title":"Cognitive Domain Levels In “English For Nusantara” Textbook : A Revised Bloom's Taxonomy Analysis","authors":"Anak Agung Putu Arsana, Anak Agung Putri Maharani, I Kadek Joni Arta, Ayu Diah Adnya Nirmala, Rahma Syahlani","doi":"10.31940/senarilip.v5i1.13-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This qualitative descriptive study aims to assess the alignment between the cognitive domain of Revised Bloom's Taxonomy and the worksheets in the English textbook “English for Nusantara” published by Pusat Perbukuan used for the 7th grade of SMP students. The research focuses on analyzing 177 activities within the textbook, categorizing them based on their cognitive domain using a data analysis table. The results indicate that the activities are distributed as follows: 114 (64.4%) in the remembering category, 12 (6.8%) in understanding, 6 (3.4%) in applying, 16 (9.0%) in analyzing, 5 (2.8%) in evaluating, and 24 (13.6%) in creating. Among these activities, 45 (25.4%) fall under the higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) category, while 132 (74.6%) are classified as lower-order thinking skills (LOTS). The dominant activity type observed is remembering, which represents the lowest cognitive level in Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. Additionally, the distribution of LOTS and HOTS activities varies significantly across different chapters. These findings suggest that relying solely on the English textbook may not be sufficient for developing students' higher-order thinking skills (HOTS).","PeriodicalId":500875,"journal":{"name":"Prosiding Seminar Nasional Riset Bahasa dan Pengajaran Bahasa","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosiding Seminar Nasional Riset Bahasa dan Pengajaran Bahasa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31940/senarilip.v5i1.13-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This qualitative descriptive study aims to assess the alignment between the cognitive domain of Revised Bloom's Taxonomy and the worksheets in the English textbook “English for Nusantara” published by Pusat Perbukuan used for the 7th grade of SMP students. The research focuses on analyzing 177 activities within the textbook, categorizing them based on their cognitive domain using a data analysis table. The results indicate that the activities are distributed as follows: 114 (64.4%) in the remembering category, 12 (6.8%) in understanding, 6 (3.4%) in applying, 16 (9.0%) in analyzing, 5 (2.8%) in evaluating, and 24 (13.6%) in creating. Among these activities, 45 (25.4%) fall under the higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) category, while 132 (74.6%) are classified as lower-order thinking skills (LOTS). The dominant activity type observed is remembering, which represents the lowest cognitive level in Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. Additionally, the distribution of LOTS and HOTS activities varies significantly across different chapters. These findings suggest that relying solely on the English textbook may not be sufficient for developing students' higher-order thinking skills (HOTS).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《努沙塔拉英语》教材的认知领域层次:修订后的布鲁姆分类法分析
本定性描述性研究旨在评估修订布鲁姆分类法的认知领域与Pusat Perbukuan出版的用于SMP七年级学生的英语教科书“努沙马拉英语”中的工作表之间的一致性。该研究重点分析了教科书中的177个活动,并使用数据分析表根据其认知领域对其进行了分类。结果表明,学生参与记忆类活动114人(64.4%)、理解类活动12人(6.8%)、应用类活动6人(3.4%)、分析类活动16人(9.0%)、评价类活动5人(2.8%)、创造类活动24人(13.6%)。在这些活动中,有45项(25.4%)属于高阶思维技能(HOTS)类别,而132项(74.6%)属于低阶思维技能(LOTS)类别。观察到的主要活动类型是记忆,它代表了修订布鲁姆分类法中最低的认知水平。此外,lot和HOTS活动的分布在不同章节之间差异很大。这些发现表明,仅仅依靠英语教科书可能不足以培养学生的高阶思维技能(HOTS)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving Students’ Speaking Skill through Public Speaking Paradox and Irony Found in Selected Song Lyric of Avenged Sevenfold in The Album Entitled Avenged Sevenfold 2007 Analysis of Collaborative Project-Based Language Learning Method: Efforts to Improve Language Education Quality for Tourism Students Cognitive Domain Levels In “English For Nusantara” Textbook : A Revised Bloom's Taxonomy Analysis Bentuk Cognate Objek Bahasa Bali
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1