We built this culture (so we can change it): Seven principles for intentional culture change.

IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY American Psychologist Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-16 DOI:10.1037/amp0001209
MarYam G Hamedani, Hazel Rose Markus, Rebecca C Hetey, Jennifer L Eberhardt
{"title":"We built this culture (so we can change it): Seven principles for intentional culture change.","authors":"MarYam G Hamedani, Hazel Rose Markus, Rebecca C Hetey, Jennifer L Eberhardt","doi":"10.1037/amp0001209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Calls for culture change abound. Headlines regularly feature calls to change the \"broken\" or \"toxic\" cultures of institutions and organizations, and people debate which norms and practices across society are now defunct. As people blame current societal problems on culture, the proposed fix is \"culture change.\" But what is culture change? How does it work? Can it be effective? This article presents a novel social psychological framework for <i>intentional culture change</i>-actively and deliberately modifying the mutually reinforcing features of a culture. Synthesizing insights from research and application, it proposes an integrated, evidence-based perspective centered around <i>seven core principles for intentional culture change: Principle 1</i>: People are culturally shaped shapers, so they can be culture changers; <i>Principle 2:</i> Identifying, mapping, and evaluating the key levels of culture helps locate where to target change; <i>Principle 3</i>: Culture change happens in both top-down and bottom-up ways and is more effective when the levels are in alignment; <i>Principle 4</i>: Culture change can be easier when it leverages existing core values and harder when it challenges deep-seated defaults and biases; <i>Principle 5</i>: Culture change typically involves power struggles and identity threats; <i>Principle 6</i>: Cultures interact with one another and change can cause backlash, resistance, and clashes; and <i>Principle 7</i>: Timing and readiness matter. While these principles may be broadly used, here they are applied to the issue of social inequality in the United States. Even though culture change feels particularly daunting in this problem area, it can also be empowering-especially when people leverage evidence-based insights and tools to reimagine and rebuild their cultures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001209","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Calls for culture change abound. Headlines regularly feature calls to change the "broken" or "toxic" cultures of institutions and organizations, and people debate which norms and practices across society are now defunct. As people blame current societal problems on culture, the proposed fix is "culture change." But what is culture change? How does it work? Can it be effective? This article presents a novel social psychological framework for intentional culture change-actively and deliberately modifying the mutually reinforcing features of a culture. Synthesizing insights from research and application, it proposes an integrated, evidence-based perspective centered around seven core principles for intentional culture change: Principle 1: People are culturally shaped shapers, so they can be culture changers; Principle 2: Identifying, mapping, and evaluating the key levels of culture helps locate where to target change; Principle 3: Culture change happens in both top-down and bottom-up ways and is more effective when the levels are in alignment; Principle 4: Culture change can be easier when it leverages existing core values and harder when it challenges deep-seated defaults and biases; Principle 5: Culture change typically involves power struggles and identity threats; Principle 6: Cultures interact with one another and change can cause backlash, resistance, and clashes; and Principle 7: Timing and readiness matter. While these principles may be broadly used, here they are applied to the issue of social inequality in the United States. Even though culture change feels particularly daunting in this problem area, it can also be empowering-especially when people leverage evidence-based insights and tools to reimagine and rebuild their cultures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们建立了这种文化(所以我们可以改变它):有意改变文化的七个原则。
要求文化变革的呼声比比皆是。头条新闻经常呼吁改变机构和组织的“破碎”或“有毒”文化,人们争论社会上哪些规范和做法现在已经不复存在。当人们把当前的社会问题归咎于文化时,提出的解决办法是“文化变革”。但什么是文化变革?它是如何工作的?它能有效吗?本文提出了一种新的社会心理学框架,用于有意识的文化改变——积极地、有意识地修改文化中相互增强的特征。本文综合研究和应用的见解,围绕有意文化变革的七个核心原则,提出了一个综合的、基于证据的视角:原则1:人是文化塑造的塑造者,因此他们可以成为文化变革者;原则2:识别、绘制和评估文化的关键层次有助于确定变革的目标;原则3:文化变革有自顶向下和自底向上两种方式,当各个层次一致时,文化变革更有效;原则4:当利用现有的核心价值观时,文化变革可能会更容易,而当挑战根深蒂固的默认和偏见时,文化变革就会更难;原则5:文化变革通常涉及权力斗争和身份威胁;原则6:文化是相互影响的,变化会引起反弹、抵制和冲突;原则7:时机和准备很重要。虽然这些原则可能被广泛使用,但在这里它们适用于美国的社会不平等问题。尽管在这个问题领域,文化变革让人感到特别畏惧,但它也可以赋予人们力量——尤其是当人们利用基于证据的见解和工具来重新构想和重建他们的文化时。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Psychologist
American Psychologist PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
18.50
自引率
1.20%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: Established in 1946, American Psychologist® is the flagship peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the American Psychological Association. It publishes high-impact papers of broad interest, including empirical reports, meta-analyses, and scholarly reviews, covering psychological science, practice, education, and policy. Articles often address issues of national and international significance within the field of psychology and its relationship to society. Published in an accessible style, contributions in American Psychologist are designed to be understood by both psychologists and the general public.
期刊最新文献
Daniel Kahneman (1934-2024). Jean Maria Arrigo (1944-2024). A quasi-experimental study examining the efficacy of multimodal bot screening tools and recommendations to preserve data integrity in online psychological research. Ascribing understanding to ourselves and others. The free will capacity: A uniquely human adaption.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1