Demystifying the experience of participating in a root cause analysis: A hermeneutic phenomenological study

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Applied Nursing Research Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI:10.1016/j.apnr.2023.151746
Tamu Abreu PhD, RN-BC, CPPS, CPHQ, Wyona M. Freysteinson PhD, MN, RN, FAAN, Paula Clutter PhD, RN, CNL, CNE, CENP, CMSRN, Rebecca Aulbach PhD, RN, ACNS-BC
{"title":"Demystifying the experience of participating in a root cause analysis: A hermeneutic phenomenological study","authors":"Tamu Abreu PhD, RN-BC, CPPS, CPHQ,&nbsp;Wyona M. Freysteinson PhD, MN, RN, FAAN,&nbsp;Paula Clutter PhD, RN, CNL, CNE, CENP, CMSRN,&nbsp;Rebecca Aulbach PhD, RN, ACNS-BC","doi":"10.1016/j.apnr.2023.151746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to explore registered nurses' experience participating in a root cause analysis (RCA) meeting because of their involvement in an adverse event.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>An RCA is the most common strategy used by organizations for adverse event investigations. Nursing healthcare professionals directly involved in an adverse event may be asked to participate in the RCA. However, no studies were found in the literature on their experience.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Semi-structured audio-taped interviews were held with 13 registered nurses<span> who participated in an RCA. Ricoeur's hermeneutic phenomenology guided data analysis.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Two structural elements represented the world of the nurses: 1) Learning about an RCA, and 2) being on the other side of the RCA table. Three phenomenological themes emerged: 1) anticipatory and embodied fear, 2) to speak or not to speak, 3) the aftermath.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Nurses desire RCA education to assist in understanding and support from nurse leaders throughout the process. Healthcare organizations must create a safe and collaborative environment to empower nurses to speak up and have their voices heard during the RCA process.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for nursing leaders</h3><p>Nurses want to participate in RCA meetings. However, leaders must demystify the RCA process for nurses through education and training.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50740,"journal":{"name":"Applied Nursing Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0897189723000800","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study aimed to explore registered nurses' experience participating in a root cause analysis (RCA) meeting because of their involvement in an adverse event.

Background

An RCA is the most common strategy used by organizations for adverse event investigations. Nursing healthcare professionals directly involved in an adverse event may be asked to participate in the RCA. However, no studies were found in the literature on their experience.

Methods

Semi-structured audio-taped interviews were held with 13 registered nurses who participated in an RCA. Ricoeur's hermeneutic phenomenology guided data analysis.

Results

Two structural elements represented the world of the nurses: 1) Learning about an RCA, and 2) being on the other side of the RCA table. Three phenomenological themes emerged: 1) anticipatory and embodied fear, 2) to speak or not to speak, 3) the aftermath.

Conclusion

Nurses desire RCA education to assist in understanding and support from nurse leaders throughout the process. Healthcare organizations must create a safe and collaborative environment to empower nurses to speak up and have their voices heard during the RCA process.

Implications for nursing leaders

Nurses want to participate in RCA meetings. However, leaders must demystify the RCA process for nurses through education and training.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭开参与根本原因分析经验的神秘面纱:解释学现象学研究
目的本研究旨在探讨注册护士因参与不良事件而参加根本原因分析(RCA)会议的经验。RCA是组织在不良事件调查中最常用的策略。直接参与不良事件的护理保健专业人员可能会被要求参加RCA。然而,在文献中没有发现关于他们经历的研究。方法对13名参加RCA的注册护士进行半结构化录音访谈。利科的解释学现象学指导了数据分析。结果两种结构元素代表护士的世界:1)了解RCA和2)在RCA表的另一边。三个现象学主题出现了:1)预期的和具体化的恐惧,2)说或不说,3)后果。结论护士希望通过RCA教育获得护士领导的理解和支持。医疗保健组织必须创造一个安全和协作的环境,使护士能够在RCA过程中畅所欲言,并发出自己的声音。对护理领导的启示护士希望参加RCA会议。然而,领导者必须通过教育和培训为护士揭开RCA过程的神秘面纱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Nursing Research
Applied Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Applied Nursing Research presents original, peer-reviewed research findings clearly and directly for clinical applications in all nursing specialties. Regular features include "Ask the Experts," research briefs, clinical methods, book reviews, news and announcements, and an editorial section. Applied Nursing Research covers such areas as pain management, patient education, discharge planning, nursing diagnosis, job stress in nursing, nursing influence on length of hospital stay, and nurse/physician collaboration.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “A hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation design to evaluate a community-based, heart-healthy intervention for women of low-socioeconomic status” [Appl. Nurs. Res. 71, 2023, 151686] Are male nurses oppressed? A forum theater application: A quasi-experimental study Changes in nutritional status and fatigue and their associations with quality of life in patients with pancreatic cancer after surgery: A 12-month longitudinal study Stress coping and resilience of frontline nurses under the emergency infectious disease pandemic: A latent class analysis Emergency department nurses' reflective thinking and patient safety competency: The mediating effect of patient safety culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1