Machine learning-based approach for predicting low birth weight.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2023-11-20 DOI:10.1186/s12884-023-06128-w
Amene Ranjbar, Farideh Montazeri, Mohammadsadegh Vahidi Farashah, Vahid Mehrnoush, Fatemeh Darsareh, Nasibeh Roozbeh
{"title":"Machine learning-based approach for predicting low birth weight.","authors":"Amene Ranjbar, Farideh Montazeri, Mohammadsadegh Vahidi Farashah, Vahid Mehrnoush, Fatemeh Darsareh, Nasibeh Roozbeh","doi":"10.1186/s12884-023-06128-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low birth weight (LBW) has been linked to infant mortality. Predicting LBW is a valuable preventative tool and predictor of newborn health risks. The current study employed a machine learning model to predict LBW.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study implemented predictive LBW models based on the data obtained from the \"Iranian Maternal and Neonatal Network (IMaN Net)\" from January 2020 to January 2022. Women with singleton pregnancies above the gestational age of 24 weeks were included. Exclusion criteria included multiple pregnancies and fetal anomalies. A predictive model was built using eight statistical learning models (logistic regression, decision tree classification, random forest classification, deep learning feedforward, extreme gradient boost model, light gradient boost model, support vector machine, and permutation feature classification with k-nearest neighbors). Expert opinion and prior observational cohorts were used to select candidate LBW predictors for all models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score were measured to evaluate their diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 1280 women with a recorded LBW out of 8853 deliveries, for a frequency of 14.5%. Deep learning (AUROC: 0.86), random forest classification (AUROC: 0.79), and extreme gradient boost classification (AUROC: 0.79) all have higher AUROC and perform better than others. When the other performance parameters of the models mentioned above with higher AUROC were compared, the extreme gradient boost model was the best model to predict LBW with an accuracy of 0.79, precision of 0.87, recall of 0.69, and F1 score of 0.77. According to the feature importance rank, gestational age and prior history of LBW were the top critical predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although this study found that the extreme gradient boost model performed well in predicting LBW, more research is needed to make a better conclusion on the performance of ML models in predicting LBW.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"23 1","pages":"803"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10662167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06128-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low birth weight (LBW) has been linked to infant mortality. Predicting LBW is a valuable preventative tool and predictor of newborn health risks. The current study employed a machine learning model to predict LBW.

Methods: This study implemented predictive LBW models based on the data obtained from the "Iranian Maternal and Neonatal Network (IMaN Net)" from January 2020 to January 2022. Women with singleton pregnancies above the gestational age of 24 weeks were included. Exclusion criteria included multiple pregnancies and fetal anomalies. A predictive model was built using eight statistical learning models (logistic regression, decision tree classification, random forest classification, deep learning feedforward, extreme gradient boost model, light gradient boost model, support vector machine, and permutation feature classification with k-nearest neighbors). Expert opinion and prior observational cohorts were used to select candidate LBW predictors for all models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score were measured to evaluate their diagnostic performance.

Results: We found 1280 women with a recorded LBW out of 8853 deliveries, for a frequency of 14.5%. Deep learning (AUROC: 0.86), random forest classification (AUROC: 0.79), and extreme gradient boost classification (AUROC: 0.79) all have higher AUROC and perform better than others. When the other performance parameters of the models mentioned above with higher AUROC were compared, the extreme gradient boost model was the best model to predict LBW with an accuracy of 0.79, precision of 0.87, recall of 0.69, and F1 score of 0.77. According to the feature importance rank, gestational age and prior history of LBW were the top critical predictors.

Conclusions: Although this study found that the extreme gradient boost model performed well in predicting LBW, more research is needed to make a better conclusion on the performance of ML models in predicting LBW.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的低出生体重预测方法。
背景:低出生体重(LBW)与婴儿死亡率有关。预测新生儿体重是一种有价值的预防工具和预测新生儿健康风险的指标。目前的研究采用了机器学习模型来预测LBW。方法:本研究基于2020年1月至2022年1月从“伊朗孕产妇和新生儿网络(IMaN Net)”获得的数据实施了预测LBW模型。孕龄超过24周的单胎妊娠妇女也包括在内。排除标准包括多胎妊娠和胎儿异常。采用8种统计学习模型(逻辑回归、决策树分类、随机森林分类、深度学习前馈、极端梯度增强模型、轻梯度增强模型、支持向量机和k近邻排列特征分类)构建预测模型。使用专家意见和先前的观察队列来选择所有模型的候选LBW预测因子。测量受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、准确度、精密度、召回率和F1评分来评价其诊断效果。结果:在8853次分娩中,我们发现1280名妇女有记录的LBW,频率为14.5%。深度学习(AUROC: 0.86)、随机森林分类(AUROC: 0.79)和极端梯度增强分类(AUROC: 0.79)都有更高的AUROC,并且表现更好。比较上述模型的其他性能参数和较高的AUROC,极值梯度提升模型是预测LBW的最佳模型,准确率为0.79,精密度为0.87,召回率为0.69,F1得分为0.77。根据特征重要性排序,胎龄和既往LBW史是最重要的预测因素。结论:虽然本研究发现极端梯度提升模型在预测LBW方面表现良好,但对于ML模型在预测LBW方面的性能,还需要更多的研究来得出更好的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Prenatal exposure to psychotropics and analgesics on cognitive, linguistic and educational outcomes - a scoping review with focus on validity and reliability of outcome measures. The relationship between maternal oral health parameters, inflammatory blood markers, and the evaluation of their effects on preterm low birth weight. Digital intervention for tokophobia: a randomized controlled trial of internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy on fear of childbirth and self-efficacy among Egyptian pregnant women. Preference of mode of delivery and associated factors among mothers in East Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis. Disrespect and abuse during childbirth and associated factors among women: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1