Preference of mode of delivery and associated factors among mothers in East Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1186/s12884-025-07287-8
Birhan Ambachew Taye, Belyu Yehualashet Weldearegay, Bantie Getnet Yirsaw, Melese Enyew Demsie, Fasiledes Fetene Asfaw, Abebe Birhanu Teka, Aychew Kassa Belete
{"title":"Preference of mode of delivery and associated factors among mothers in East Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Birhan Ambachew Taye, Belyu Yehualashet Weldearegay, Bantie Getnet Yirsaw, Melese Enyew Demsie, Fasiledes Fetene Asfaw, Abebe Birhanu Teka, Aychew Kassa Belete","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07287-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Preference of mode of delivery refers to the expectant mother's personal choice or preference for the method by which she would like to have her baby delivered. Although there are many fragmented primary studies on the preference of mode of delivery among women in East Africa, the pooled preference rate is unknown. In addition, those studies disagreed on reporting the associated factors. Therefore, this study was intended to determine the pooled preference for mode of delivery and its associated factors among women in East Africa.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched studies using PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Science Direct, and Google Scholar that were published between March 01/2014 and March 31/2024. This study used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The quality of studies was evaluated using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment tool. The data were extracted by two authors independently using Microsoft Excel and analyzed by Stata version 17. A random effects model was applied to calculate the pooled preference for mode of delivery and its associated factors. The PROSPERO registration number for the review was CRD42024541921.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 studies comprising 47,561 participants were involved in this meta-analysis. The pooled preference of vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery were 75% ((95% C.I = 67 - 83%) and 25% (95% C.I = 17 - 34%), [Formula: see text]respectively. This study showed that ANC-follow (OR= 1.11; 95% CI=0.67-1.82), previous intrapartum satisfaction (OR= 2.69; 95% CI = 0.53-13.64), place of residence (OR= 1.10; 95% CI = 0.86-1.42), occupation (P=0.000; OR= 0.97; 95% CI=0.67-1.42), planned pregnancy (OR= 1.89; 95% CI=1.26-2.82), previous history of spontaneous abortion (OR= 2.30; 95% CI=0.71-7.44), current pregnancy related problem (OR= 3.86; 95% CI=1.37-10.84), discussion with a partner (OR= 0.67; 95% CI=0.35-1.27), types of the hospital (OR= 1.13; 95% CI = 0.65-1.94) were significant factors associated with preference of mode of delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The preference for vaginal delivery was higher than for cesarean delivery. Factors such as antenatal care follow-up, previous intrapartum satisfaction, place of residence, occupation, planned pregnancy, prior history of spontaneous abortion, maternal education, current pregnancy-related problems, discussion with partner, and types of hospital were significantly associated. The findings of this study imply a multifaceted approach is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07287-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Preference of mode of delivery refers to the expectant mother's personal choice or preference for the method by which she would like to have her baby delivered. Although there are many fragmented primary studies on the preference of mode of delivery among women in East Africa, the pooled preference rate is unknown. In addition, those studies disagreed on reporting the associated factors. Therefore, this study was intended to determine the pooled preference for mode of delivery and its associated factors among women in East Africa.

Method: We searched studies using PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Science Direct, and Google Scholar that were published between March 01/2014 and March 31/2024. This study used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The quality of studies was evaluated using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment tool. The data were extracted by two authors independently using Microsoft Excel and analyzed by Stata version 17. A random effects model was applied to calculate the pooled preference for mode of delivery and its associated factors. The PROSPERO registration number for the review was CRD42024541921.

Results: A total of 14 studies comprising 47,561 participants were involved in this meta-analysis. The pooled preference of vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery were 75% ((95% C.I = 67 - 83%) and 25% (95% C.I = 17 - 34%), [Formula: see text]respectively. This study showed that ANC-follow (OR= 1.11; 95% CI=0.67-1.82), previous intrapartum satisfaction (OR= 2.69; 95% CI = 0.53-13.64), place of residence (OR= 1.10; 95% CI = 0.86-1.42), occupation (P=0.000; OR= 0.97; 95% CI=0.67-1.42), planned pregnancy (OR= 1.89; 95% CI=1.26-2.82), previous history of spontaneous abortion (OR= 2.30; 95% CI=0.71-7.44), current pregnancy related problem (OR= 3.86; 95% CI=1.37-10.84), discussion with a partner (OR= 0.67; 95% CI=0.35-1.27), types of the hospital (OR= 1.13; 95% CI = 0.65-1.94) were significant factors associated with preference of mode of delivery.

Conclusion: The preference for vaginal delivery was higher than for cesarean delivery. Factors such as antenatal care follow-up, previous intrapartum satisfaction, place of residence, occupation, planned pregnancy, prior history of spontaneous abortion, maternal education, current pregnancy-related problems, discussion with partner, and types of hospital were significantly associated. The findings of this study imply a multifaceted approach is required.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Prenatal exposure to psychotropics and analgesics on cognitive, linguistic and educational outcomes - a scoping review with focus on validity and reliability of outcome measures. The relationship between maternal oral health parameters, inflammatory blood markers, and the evaluation of their effects on preterm low birth weight. Digital intervention for tokophobia: a randomized controlled trial of internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy on fear of childbirth and self-efficacy among Egyptian pregnant women. Preference of mode of delivery and associated factors among mothers in East Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis. Disrespect and abuse during childbirth and associated factors among women: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1