{"title":"Preference of mode of delivery and associated factors among mothers in East Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Birhan Ambachew Taye, Belyu Yehualashet Weldearegay, Bantie Getnet Yirsaw, Melese Enyew Demsie, Fasiledes Fetene Asfaw, Abebe Birhanu Teka, Aychew Kassa Belete","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07287-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Preference of mode of delivery refers to the expectant mother's personal choice or preference for the method by which she would like to have her baby delivered. Although there are many fragmented primary studies on the preference of mode of delivery among women in East Africa, the pooled preference rate is unknown. In addition, those studies disagreed on reporting the associated factors. Therefore, this study was intended to determine the pooled preference for mode of delivery and its associated factors among women in East Africa.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched studies using PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Science Direct, and Google Scholar that were published between March 01/2014 and March 31/2024. This study used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The quality of studies was evaluated using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment tool. The data were extracted by two authors independently using Microsoft Excel and analyzed by Stata version 17. A random effects model was applied to calculate the pooled preference for mode of delivery and its associated factors. The PROSPERO registration number for the review was CRD42024541921.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 studies comprising 47,561 participants were involved in this meta-analysis. The pooled preference of vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery were 75% ((95% C.I = 67 - 83%) and 25% (95% C.I = 17 - 34%), [Formula: see text]respectively. This study showed that ANC-follow (OR= 1.11; 95% CI=0.67-1.82), previous intrapartum satisfaction (OR= 2.69; 95% CI = 0.53-13.64), place of residence (OR= 1.10; 95% CI = 0.86-1.42), occupation (P=0.000; OR= 0.97; 95% CI=0.67-1.42), planned pregnancy (OR= 1.89; 95% CI=1.26-2.82), previous history of spontaneous abortion (OR= 2.30; 95% CI=0.71-7.44), current pregnancy related problem (OR= 3.86; 95% CI=1.37-10.84), discussion with a partner (OR= 0.67; 95% CI=0.35-1.27), types of the hospital (OR= 1.13; 95% CI = 0.65-1.94) were significant factors associated with preference of mode of delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The preference for vaginal delivery was higher than for cesarean delivery. Factors such as antenatal care follow-up, previous intrapartum satisfaction, place of residence, occupation, planned pregnancy, prior history of spontaneous abortion, maternal education, current pregnancy-related problems, discussion with partner, and types of hospital were significantly associated. The findings of this study imply a multifaceted approach is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07287-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Preference of mode of delivery refers to the expectant mother's personal choice or preference for the method by which she would like to have her baby delivered. Although there are many fragmented primary studies on the preference of mode of delivery among women in East Africa, the pooled preference rate is unknown. In addition, those studies disagreed on reporting the associated factors. Therefore, this study was intended to determine the pooled preference for mode of delivery and its associated factors among women in East Africa.
Method: We searched studies using PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Science Direct, and Google Scholar that were published between March 01/2014 and March 31/2024. This study used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The quality of studies was evaluated using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment tool. The data were extracted by two authors independently using Microsoft Excel and analyzed by Stata version 17. A random effects model was applied to calculate the pooled preference for mode of delivery and its associated factors. The PROSPERO registration number for the review was CRD42024541921.
Results: A total of 14 studies comprising 47,561 participants were involved in this meta-analysis. The pooled preference of vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery were 75% ((95% C.I = 67 - 83%) and 25% (95% C.I = 17 - 34%), [Formula: see text]respectively. This study showed that ANC-follow (OR= 1.11; 95% CI=0.67-1.82), previous intrapartum satisfaction (OR= 2.69; 95% CI = 0.53-13.64), place of residence (OR= 1.10; 95% CI = 0.86-1.42), occupation (P=0.000; OR= 0.97; 95% CI=0.67-1.42), planned pregnancy (OR= 1.89; 95% CI=1.26-2.82), previous history of spontaneous abortion (OR= 2.30; 95% CI=0.71-7.44), current pregnancy related problem (OR= 3.86; 95% CI=1.37-10.84), discussion with a partner (OR= 0.67; 95% CI=0.35-1.27), types of the hospital (OR= 1.13; 95% CI = 0.65-1.94) were significant factors associated with preference of mode of delivery.
Conclusion: The preference for vaginal delivery was higher than for cesarean delivery. Factors such as antenatal care follow-up, previous intrapartum satisfaction, place of residence, occupation, planned pregnancy, prior history of spontaneous abortion, maternal education, current pregnancy-related problems, discussion with partner, and types of hospital were significantly associated. The findings of this study imply a multifaceted approach is required.
期刊介绍:
BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.